FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00896357 · files quarterly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$2.9M raised, $2.9M spent, $45.6K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
70% from donors giving $200 or less · 29% from donors giving over $200 · largest donor Leon Ochal, $10.8K. See who funds it
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
$54.5K from 21 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $2,930,069 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$2,048,87370%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$846,55029%
Largest donors
Leon Ochal10 contributions, latest Aug 25, 2026 · OWNER · CHIMNEY SCIENTIST · PHILADELPHIA, PA$10,750
Lou Patterson22 contributions, latest Oct 10, 2026 · UNEMPLOYED · GLEN ELLEN, CA$7,400
Michael Burke58 contributions, latest Oct 8, 2026 · RETIRED · REDONDO BEACH, CA$7,255
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 18,132 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $866.3K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$33,3421.1%
Hold the Line1 receipt, latest Mar 30, 2026 · Pac (qualified)$2,000
Party committeesNational, state, and local committees of a political party.$1,004<0.1%
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$300<0.1%
Total reported receipts $2,930,069
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $2.9M followed back through up to 3 committees
7.2% to named individuals, 92% not itemized.
Gave directly$2.7M 92%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Not itemized by this committee92%
$2,685,707
351 smaller sources, $237.3K in all (8.1%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $884,632 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $7.7K
$7.7K+
$30.7K+
$69.1K+
$122.8K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
North Carolina2,662 contributions · 22%
$191,819
California3,192 contributions · 19%
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $2,941,848 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$2,885,37598%
Paid to
Switchboard37 payments · latest Oct 6, 2026 · CAMPAIGN TEXT FUNDRAISING$261,272
MDC Group24 payments · latest Oct 7, 2026 · FUNDRAISING CONSULTING SERVICES DIGITAL FUNDRAISING STRATEGY AND DONOR ACQUISITION SUPPORT (EMAIL FU$196,021
SNJ Strategic Solutions25 payments · latest Oct 1, 2026 · CAMPAIGN COMPLIANCE AND BOOKING$96,189
True Blue Analytics23 payments · latest Oct 8, 2026 · DATA ACQUISTION$87,425
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$35,3761.2%
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$21,0970.7%
Total reported disbursements $2,941,848
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $2,869,300 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$943,54833%
Filed as
CAMPAIGN TEXT FUNDRAISING$184,979
CAMPAIGN FUNDRAISING DATA AND FINANCE SERVICES$146,950
CAMPAIGN FUNDRAISING EMAIL/TEXT$132,025
Spending over time
$2.9M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $582.9K, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
$2.9M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No Lobbying Disclosure Act filings were matched to this committee. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Ojeda for NC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a House campaign committee. It is a principal campaign committee. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports. Here they come to $45.5K, more than the $33.3K this committee's own reports show on the line.
$167,759
Florida1,048 contributions · 6.2%
$54,455
Pennsylvania777 contributions · 4.3%
$38,478
Texas646 contributions · 4.2%
$37,362
New York940 contributions · 4.1%
$36,056
Virginia650 contributions · 3.9%
$34,464
Massachusetts499 contributions · 3.4%
$30,153
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 13,510 contributions · 69% of ranked
$560,598
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 876 contributions · 6.7% of ranked
$54,307
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 850 contributions · 6.5% of ranked
$53,359
Chimney Company8 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$9,250
Glamour Magazine3 contributions · 0.7% of ranked
$5,300
Donald Henley6 contributions · 0.6% of ranked
$4,700
HH OIL Tools INC39 contributions · 0.5% of ranked
$3,900
Daniel P Matthews17 contributions · 0.4% of ranked
$3,556
A further $42,039 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,048,873) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 13,406 contributions · 67% of ranked
$558,823
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 881 contributions · 6.2% of ranked
$51,630
Self-employedWritten instead of an occupation · 33 contributions · 1.6% of ranked
$13,185
Engineer460 contributions · 1.3% of ranked
$10,586
Scientist50 contributions · 1.3% of ranked
$10,555
Consultant133 contributions · 1.2% of ranked
$9,985
Attorney116 contributions · 1% of ranked
$8,693
Physician72 contributions · 0.8% of ranked
$6,775
A further $39,797 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,048,873) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
FUNDRAISING SERVICES - DIGITAL FUNDRAISING AND DONOR ACQUISITION (EMAIL/SMS FUNDRAISING CAMPAIGNS AN$113,673
FUNDRAISING$37,868
FUNDRAISING: TEXT SERVICE$36,948
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING SERVICES - DIGITAL FUNDRAISING STRATEGY AND DONOR ACQUISITION SUPPORT (EMAIL$36,267
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING SERVICES DIGITAL FUNDRAISING STRATEGY AND DONOR ACQUISITION SUPPORT (EMAIL FU$30,952
CAMPAIGN FUNDRAISING DATA ACQUISITION$29,466
FUNDRAISING TEXT SERVICES - SMS FUNDRAISING AND DONOR SOLICITATION MESSAGING (PLATFORM SUBSCRIPTION/$26,730
CAMPAIGN COMMUNICATIONS/FINANCE CONSULTING$22,000
DATA ACQUISITION AND FUNDRAISING CONSULTING$18,021
Paid to
Switchboard$203,636
MDC Group$184,709
Ripple Effect$115,096
C2G Strategies$49,971
NGP$49,125
YM Collaborative$45,612
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$462,02116%
Filed as
ADVERTISING: TV$100,000
CAMPAIGN DIGITAL ADVERTISING$74,371
CONSULTING RETAINER - COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR AND FINANCE DIRECTOR SERVICES (MEDIA/MESSAGING AND FUN$48,544
ONLINE ADVERTISING - FACEBOOK/META PAID DIGITAL ADS (VOTER OUTREACH AND ONLINE FUNDRAISING)$44,851
DIGITAL ADS$37,967
DIGITAL ADVERTISING AND MARKETING - ONLINE AD CREATIVE AND PLACEMENT (SOCIAL/SEARCH/DISPLAY) AND CAM$30,125
DIGITAL PAID MEDIA AND FUNDRAISING CONSULTING SERVICES$30,025
DIGITAL MEDIA SERVICES - DIGITAL ADVERTISING STRATEGY, CREATIVE DEVELOPMENT$21,000
ADVERTISING: DIGITAL ADVERTISING$12,500
CONNECTED TV MEDIA PLACEMENT AND BUYING SERVICES FOR VOTER PERSUASION AND CAMPAIGN ADVERTISING$11,000
CAMPAIGN VIDEO$10,025
DIGITAL ADVERTISING - CREATOR-LED SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGNS$10,000
Paid to
SKDK$100,000
Facebook$99,962
JJN Multimedia$40,150
Redshirt Cloud$39,967
RMS$31,000
Authentics$30,025
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$328,16911%
Filed as
CAMPAIGN COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING$108,591
CAMPAIGN COMPLIANCE AND BOOKING$54,296
CAMPAIGN DIGITAL CONSULTING$36,380
FIELD CONSULTING - VOTER CONTACT AND CANVASSING OPERATIONS (FIELD STRATEGY, VOLUNTEER COORDINATION)$26,000
COMPLIANCE AND BOOKKEEPING CONSULTING - CAMPAIGN FINANCE RECORDKEEPING, TRANSACTION ENTRY/RECONCILIA$25,750
CONSULTANT - GENERAL CAMPAIGN CONSULTING (STRATEGIC PLANNING AND CAMPAIGN OPERATIONS)$17,881
COMPLIANCE SOFTWARE$17,267
CAMPAIGN COMPLIANCE AND FINANCE$12,394
DIGITAL MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING RETAINER - ONGOING MANAGEMENT OF CAMPAIGN DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS A$12,000
FIELD CONSULTING VOTER CONTACT AND CANVASSING OPERATIONS (FIELD STRATEGY, VOLUNTEER COORDINATION)$5,000
ADMIN CONSULTING$4,000
FIELD CONSULTING - VOTER CONTACT AND CANVASSING OPERATIONS EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT$2,791
Paid to
RMS Group$106,591
SNJ Strategic Solutions$88,939
A.B.E Association LLC$33,791
Neptune Political$17,881
Redshirt Cloud$12,000
APH Digital LLC$9,850
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$310,80511%
Filed as
CAMPAIGN LEADERSHIP$147,629
DIGITAL CAMPAIGN SERVICES$115,800
No description filed$26,442
FIELDS SERVICES$11,250
CAMPAIGN LEADERSHIP - EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT$5,358
CAMPAIGN LEADERSHIP-EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT$4,042
CAMPAIGN MERCHANDISE$236
CALL TIME MANAGER$49
Paid to
Authentic Campaign$110,800
Dorra, Amy$107,090
Graham, David$25,170
Neptune Political$24,768
ActBlue Technical Services$21,442
A B E Associationi LLC$11,250
Payroll and staffSalaries, wages, benefits, and payroll services.$226,3397.9%
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,457 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Switchboard37 payments · 8.9% of all spending
$261,272
MDC Group24 payments · 6.7% of all spending
$196,021
Dorra, Amy53 payments · 6.2% of all spending
$183,178
RMS Group35 payments · 5.2% of all spending
$152,501
Authentic Campaign20 payments · 4.5% of all spending
$131,300
Ripple Effect15 payments · 3.9% of all spending
$115,096
ActBlue Technical Services87 payments · 3.6% of all spending
$106,072
SKDK1 payment · 3.4% of all spending
$100,000
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.