$8.4M raised, $8.9M spent, $1M cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
61% from donors giving $200 or less · 25% in transfers from related committees · largest donor New York State Laborers' International Union of North America PAC, $1.2M. See who funds it
Where it goes
$4K spent for candidates · $8.5M given to candidates and committees, the largest to HMP ($3M) · 85% of its support to Democrats, 9.7% to Republicans. See where it goes
Lobbying
Laborers' International Union of North America lobbied on 8 issues. See lobbying
Audits and penalties
1 audit report, published by the FEC
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
Why this committee exists In its own words
“LIUNA PAC is the federal political action committee of the Laborers’ International Union of North America (LIUNA).
LIUNA PAC supports the advancement of the interests of LIUNA members, their families, the labor movement and all working people through contributions and expenditures in federal and state elections.”
Laborers' International Union of North America PAC, on its own site, liunapac.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Its site sums up what it stands for in the statement above, and publishes no list of positions beyond it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$1.5M to 246 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $1,451,014
Democratic 85%
Support by the party of the candidate
Party of the candidate
Candidates
Direct
Independent
Amount
Share
Democratic
202
$1,235,000
$0
$1,235,000
85%
Republican
24
$141,000
$0
$141,000
9.7%
Other or unresolved
20
$71,000
$4,014
$75,014
5.2%
Shown support
246
$1,447,000
$4,014
$1,451,014
100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$8,539,000 in 677 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
284
$1.6M · 19%
Republican candidates
29
$166K · 1.9%
Other or unresolved candidates
19
$71K · 0.8%
Democratic party committees
6
$325K · 3.8%
Republican party committees
2
$10K · 0.1%
Other party committees
4
$450K · 5.2%
Other PACs and committees
92
$5.9M · 69%
All recipients
436
$8.6M
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
California
48
$391K
New York
22
$115.5K
Pennsylvania
15
$102.5K
Illinois
23
$99K
Massachusetts
12
$92.5K
New Jersey
21
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $8,429,409 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$5,115,32861%
TransfersMoney moved in from affiliated committees.$2,114,32025%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$1,192,12914%
Largest donors
Terrence Healy22 contributions, latest Oct 9, 2026 · VICE PRESIDENT · LIUNA · ELMWOOD PARK, IL$9,252
Robert Abbott22 contributions, latest Oct 9, 2026 · VICE PRESIDENT · LIUNA · EAST WENATCHEE, WA$8,197
David Frye22 contributions, latest Oct 9, 2026 · VICE PRESIDENT · LIUNA · DANVILLE, IN$8,197
Michael Hellstrom22 contributions, latest Oct 9, 2026 · VICE PRESIDENT · LIUNA · PINE BUSH, NY$8,197
Jon Preciado22 contributions, latest Oct 13, 2026 · BUSINESS MANAGER · SOUTHERN CA DISTRICT COUNCIL · COVINA, CA$7,880
Oscar De La Torre16 contributions, latest Oct 6, 2026 · BUSINESS MANAGER · NORTHERN CA LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL · DANVILLE, CA$7,630
Joseph V. Healy20 contributions, latest Aug 22, 2026 · SECRETARY-TREASURER · CHICAGO LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL · LA GRANGE PARK, IL$7,506
James P. Connolly24 contributions, latest Aug 14, 2026 · BUSINESS MANAGER · CHICAGO DISTRICT COUNCIL · PALOS PARK, IL$7,198
Sergio H. Rascon21 contributions, latest Aug 28, 2026 · BUSINESS MANAGER · LABORERS' LOCAL NO. 300 · SYLMAR, CA$7,164
Richard Kuczkowski29 contributions, latest Oct 13, 2026 · BUSINESS MANAGER · LABORERS' LOCAL NO. 2 · LEMONT, IL$6,284
Pedro Santillan22 contributions, latest Oct 13, 2026 · SECRETARY TREASURER · SOUTHERN CA DISTRICT COUNCIL OF LABORE · TORRANCE, CA$5,970
Marty Flanagan21 contributions, latest Sep 22, 2026 · GRIEVANCE DIRECTOR · CHICAGO LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL · CROWN POINT, IN$5,938
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 10,962 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.2M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Refunds and rebatesMoney coming back to the committee: rebates and refunds of what it spent, contributions it made that were returned, and loans it made that were repaid.$7,500<0.1%
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$97<0.1%
Other receiptsInterest, dividends and other income the committee files on a line of its own.$35<0.1%
Total reported receipts $8,429,409
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $8.4M followed back through up to 3 committees
3.3% to named individuals, 97% not itemized.
Gave directly$6.1M 72%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Not itemized by this committee72%
$6,051,705
Through New York State Laborers' PAC$979K 12%
Through New York State Laborers' PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by New York State Laborers' PAC9.7%
$817,066
Then Mason Tenders District Council of Greater New York & LI PAC$161.9K 1.9%
Then Mason Tenders District Council of Greater New York & LI PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Mason Tenders District Council of Greater New York & LI PAC1.9%
$161,885
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $1,188,703 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $12.2K
$12.2K+
$48.7K+
$109.5K+
$194.7K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California2,434 contributions · 26%
$304,255
Illinois2,093 contributions · 22%
$266,409
Washington1,446 contributions · 15%
$178,754
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $8,863,979 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Contributions to candidates and other committeesMoney given to federal candidates, party committees and other PACs.$8,546,50096%
Paid to
HMP3 payments · latest Oct 8, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION$3,000,000
SMP2 payments · latest Oct 8, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION$1,500,000
Transfers to affiliated committeesMoney moved to a committee under the same sponsor or party.$8,9220.1%
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$8,119<0.1%
Independent expendituresSpending to support or oppose a candidate, made without coordinating with them.$4,014<0.1%
Spent for or against
Kamala HarrisSupport · 2 records · latest Jan 16, 2025$4,014
Total reported disbursements $8,863,979
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
For or against 1 candidate$4,014
In regular reports
$4K
1 candidate, through Oct 14, 2026
Newer notices
$0
No notices
Kamala Harris▲ For · President2 records, latest Jan 16, 2025 · FEC filing$4K
What the payments were for $8,839,084 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$8,820,70099.8%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$8,539,000
NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$281,700
Paid to
HMP$3,000,000
SMP$1,500,000
Lone Star Rising PAC$500,000
DNC Services Corp / Democratic National Committee$300,000
Democratic Grassroots Victory Fund$235,000
DCCC$210,000
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$12,0510.1%
Filed as
BANK FEES
Spending over time
$8.9M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $2.9M, Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026.
$8.9M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$2,888,005
September 2026$89,273
August 2026$1,017,637
July 2026$340,061
June 2026$91,521
May 2026$1,484,864
April 2026$80,762
March 2026$260,474
February 2026$1,117,193
January 2026$258,057
December 2025$262,687
November 2025$38,114
October 2025$133,542
September 2025$99,831
August 2025$209,234
July 2025$155,970
June 2025$56,724
May 2025$37,885
April 2025$88,216
March 2025$93,584
February 2025$16,745
January 2025$43,602
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Audit reports
1
Audit findings
2000 cycleReport released Oct 26, 2004
RecordkeepingPayroll Deduction Authorizations
Misstatement of Financial ActivityDisbursements · Receipts
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Nov 8, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
LobbyingWhat does its sponsor lobby on?
What Laborers' International Union of North America lobbies on 2026 reports
Besides giving through its PAC, Laborers' International Union of North America pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Spent on lobbying in 2026
$1.3M
Quarterly reports read
3
Bills it named
15
Topics it lobbied on
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Budget/Appropriationsin 3 report entries
In its own words
no lobbying activity
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SENATE
Civil Rights/Civil Libertiesin 3 report entries · 1 bill named
In its own words
HR 14 the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act - LIUNA supports this bill to protect voting rights.
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) - No specific bill #. LIUNA opposes weakening TSCA.
No lobbying activity
Government Issuesin 3 report entries
In its own words
National Defense Authorization Act Lobbied in support of Rep. Norcross' language restoring the collective bargaining right of civilian employees of the Department of Defense.
LIUNA lobbied to insert language that would help National Guard dual-status technicians' right to collectively bargain.
LIUNA opposed efforts to weaken Federal workers' job security, benefits, and due process.
Lobbied in support of language restoring the collective bargaining right of civilian employees of the Department of Defense in the Defense Reauthorization Bill.
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SENATE
Health Issuesin 3 report entries · 2 bills named
In its own words
S. 5327 - The Constructing the Path to Suicide Prevention Act.
LIUNA support this legislation to study and address high suicide rates in the construction industry.
H.R. 6213 - The Heat Workforce Standards Act of 2025.
LIUNA opposes this bill which would weaken heat injury and illness standards.
LIUNA lobbied against capping the employer tax exclusion for LIUNA health plans.
H.R. 1589 The Dream and Promise Act - LIUNA supports this bill to create a pathway to lawful permanent resident status and eventual U.S. citizenship for Dreamers, Temporary Protected Status holders, and Deferred Enforced Departure recipients S. 4814 - LIUNA supports this bill to require the Secretary of Homeland Security to designate Haiti for temporary protected status.
S. 2468/H.R. 4696 - The Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of 1929.
LIUNA supports these bills to update the nation's historical "registry" immigration provision.
H.R. 1589 The Dream and Promise Act - LIUNA supports this bill to protect young immigrants and people with Temporary Protected Status.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Laborers' International Union of North AmericaIts own staff · 3 reports$1.3M
Contributions on the LD-203 report
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $1.2M is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
DCCC - Headquarters Fund$45K
DCCC - Recount Fund$45K
DNC Services Corp / Democratic National Committee - Building Fund$45K
DNC Services Corp / Democratic National Committee - Convention Fund$45K
DNC Services Corp / Democratic National Committee - Legal Fund$45K
DSCC - Building Fund$45K
DSCC - Legal Defense Fund$45K
DCCC$15K
DNC Services Corp / Democratic National Committee$15K
NRCC$15K
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA”, found by searching “LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Nov 7, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA (LIUNA) PAC
Filings covered
Through Oct 14, 2026
Data source
FEC bulk filing data
Laborers' International Union of North America PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names Laborers' International Union of North America as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Laborers' International Union of North America PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Bars drawn to $3M, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Rob Bresnahan3 receipts, latest Jul 14, 2026Rob for PA · H4PA08124$15K
Joseph D. Morelle3 receipts, latest Nov 18, 2025Joe Morelle for Congress · H8NY25105$10K
Mark Pocan4 receipts, latest Mar 5, 2026Mark Pocan for Congress · H2WI02124$10K
Richard E. Neal3 receipts, latest May 28, 2026Richard E Neal for Congress Committee · H8MA02041$10K
Jake Auchincloss3 receipts, latest May 28, 2026Jake Auchincloss for Congress · H0MA04192$10K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Through Mason Tenders District Council PAC Federal Account
$529.2K 6.3%
Through Mason Tenders District Council PAC Federal Account
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Mason Tenders District Council PAC Federal Account6.3%
$529,235
Through NJ State Laborers PAC/ Laborers' International Union of North America PAC$465.2K 5.5%
Through NJ State Laborers PAC/ Laborers' International Union of North America PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by NJ State Laborers PAC/ Laborers' International Union of North America PAC5.5%
$465,190
Through Mid-Atlantic Laborers' Political League$86.9K 1%
Through Mid-Atlantic Laborers' Political League
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Mid-Atlantic Laborers' Political League1%
$86,893
259 smaller sources, $317.4K in all (3.8%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Ohio
684 contributions · 5.2%
$61,464
Wisconsin585 contributions · 5%
$59,852
Nevada415 contributions · 2.9%
$34,169
New York509 contributions · 2.9%
$33,961
Indiana224 contributions · 2.6%
$31,384
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Liuna1,083 contributions · 14% of ranked
$162,697
Laborers' Local NO 242370 contributions · 5% of ranked
$57,095
Laborers' Local NO 300258 contributions · 4.5% of ranked
$51,203
Great Lakes Region Organizing Comm312 contributions · 2.8% of ranked
$32,316
Chicagoland LAB Training & Appr Fund327 contributions · 2.7% of ranked
$30,685
Northwest REG Organizing Coalition264 contributions · 2.1% of ranked
$23,746
Laborers' Local NO 2107 contributions · 2% of ranked
$22,856
Laborers' Local NO 252154 contributions · 1.8% of ranked
$20,094
A further $51,730 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($5,115,328) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Business Manager963 contributions · 13% of ranked
$153,676
Vice President457 contributions · 6.8% of ranked
$80,533
Organizer828 contributions · 6% of ranked
$71,360
President438 contributions · 4.8% of ranked
$56,480
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 880 contributions · 4.3% of ranked
$50,536
Business Agent582 contributions · 4% of ranked
$47,788
Secretary-treasurer192 contributions · 3.1% of ranked
$36,613
Market Representative360 contributions · 2.4% of ranked
$28,559
A further $1,238 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($5,115,328) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Crowley for Wisconsin1 payment · latest Aug 24, 2026 · NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$86,000
Sarah for Wisconsin1 payment · latest Aug 24, 2026 · NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$26,000
Democratic Party of Wisconsin Segregated Fund2 payments · latest Feb 18, 2026 · NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$24,000
Democratic Party of Wisconsin2 payments · latest Feb 18, 2026 · NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$24,000
Susan Crawford for Wisconsin1 payment · latest Jan 23, 2025 · NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$18,000
State Senate Democratic Committee Segregated Fund1 payment · latest May 27, 2026 · NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$12,000
State Senate Democratic Committee1 payment · latest May 27, 2026 · NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$12,000
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$4K of it was independent spending for Kamala Harris$4,910<0.1%
Filed as
Payment and Actual Cost for Printing and Shipping of Stickers As Disclosed on 10/11 48-Hr ReportIndependent spending in support of Kamala Harris$3,619
SHIPPING$896
Payment for Shipping of Rally Signs As Disclosed on 10/11 48-Hr ReportIndependent spending in support of Kamala Harris$396
Paid to
Kelly PressIndependent spending in support of Kamala Harris$3,619
SAN Franstitchco, Inc.$896
MosaicIndependent spending in support of Kamala Harris$396
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$799<0.1%
Filed as
WEBSITE MANAGEMENT$799
Paid to
Laborers' International Union of North America$799
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$624<0.1%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING EQUIPMENT$429
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEES$195
Paid to
Newtek Merchant Solutions$429
Clover$195
Total itemized disbursements $8,839,084
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 731 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Crowley for Wisconsin1 payment, latest Aug 24, 2026NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$86K
Sarah for Wisconsin1 payment, latest Aug 24, 2026NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$26K
Democratic Party of Wisconsin Segregated Fund2 payments, latest Feb 18, 2026NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$24K
Democratic Party of Wisconsin2 payments, latest Feb 18, 2026NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$24K
Susan Crawford for Wisconsin1 payment, latest Jan 23, 2025NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$18K
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 20 payments totaling $281.7K.
Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to KATIE HOBBS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment