Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › PA-08 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, PA-08
Representative since 2025
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
6 priorities from robforpa.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
We must secure the border, build the wall, and reverse the Biden/Harris failed policies to stop the flow of illegal drugs and criminals into our communities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · robforpa.com
Heading as listed on robforpa.com ↗ (opens robforpa.com at this heading)
Northeastern PA families are hurting in the Biden/Harris economy. We need to stop the reckless spending, get inflation under control, and cut taxes so you can keep more of the money you earn for your family.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · robforpa.com
Heading as listed on robforpa.com ↗ (opens robforpa.com at this heading)
I will always fight to protect Social Security & Medicare for future generations. It’s your money, you paid into the system, and the government needs to keep its promise to every American. I will not support raising the retirement age or any benefit cuts to these programs.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · robforpa.com
Heading as listed on robforpa.com ↗ (opens robforpa.com at this heading)
I will always stand with law enforcement and ensure they have the resources to combat the fentanyl crisis and keep our community safe. For years as a private citizen I have donated to and supported our local police and in Congress I will always back the men and women that keep our families and communities safe.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · robforpa.com
Heading as listed on robforpa.com ↗ (opens robforpa.com at this heading)
As a small business owner, I know what it takes to create good, family-sustaining jobs. I will vote for commonsense policies that unleash the American economy and get Pennsylvania back to work.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · robforpa.com
Heading as listed on robforpa.com ↗ (opens robforpa.com at this heading)
I am running for Congress because career politicians have forgotten about people back home. I was born and raised here (and I even have my plot in the Forty Fort cemetery reserved) and I will always be accessible to constituents and be a tireless advocate for our community.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · robforpa.com
Heading as listed on robforpa.com ↗ (opens robforpa.com at this heading)
95% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 36 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Agriculture
House Committee on Small Business
House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Bresnahan,’s 23 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00852137
90¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($5.8M of $6.5M). Cash on hand went from $715.3K on Mar 31, 2025 to $732.7K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $832,776 | $170,655 | $715,273 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $891,414 | $744,793 | $861,894 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $598,233 | $387,096 | $1,073,031 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $675,972 | $311,865 | $1,437,138 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $1,206,419 | $429,424 | $2,214,132 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 29, 2026 | $314,809 | $255,649 | $2,273,292 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $714,963 | $380,208 | $2,608,048 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $963,200 | $2,662,153 | $909,095 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $321,353 | $497,724 | $732,724 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
52 endorsers listed on Robert P. Bresnahan, Jr.’s own campaign site: 1 official, 40 unions, 11 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
“I am honored to have earned the support of President Trump and am proud to partner with him to advance an agenda that puts the people of Northeastern Pennsylvania first,” said Congressman Rob Bresnahan. “I look forward to working with the President to continue fighting for a stronger economy, affordable energy, and a secure border with safer communities.”
American Federation of Government Employees District 3
“Rob Bresnahan took a courageous stand to defend federal collective bargaining and has fought every day for the pay and dignity of correctional officers, VA staff, SSA workers, and TSOs across our region. That’s why AFGE named him Outstanding New Member of Congress at our 2026 Legislative Conference,” AFGE District 3 National Vice President Phil Glover said. “AFGE District 3 is proud to endorse him for re-election.” The full endorsement letter can be found HERE.”
Laborers Pennsylvania District Council
President / Business Manager · Pennsylvania Laborers’ District Council
“To qualify for our endorsement, candidates must demonstrate their dedication to our workforce through their steadfast support and dedication to protecting and advancing the important rights of fair labor standards and working conditions, to current and prospective work opportunities and economic development, and to other key initiatives that safeguard and benefit our members and their families,” said Joseph J. Laquatra, President and Business Manager of the Pennsylvania Laborers’ District Council. “We believe that Congressman Rob Bresnahan has shown a strong commitment to these matters and to”
Christina-Doherty FOP Lodge 84
“Throughout his tenure in Congress, Rob Bresnahan has proven himself to be an unwavering champion for public safety and officer welfare. From fighting to secure crucial federal funding for local departments to advocating for legislation that protects those who wear the badge, his leadership has provided our officers with the confidence and resources needed to execute their duties safely and effectively,” said FOP Lodge 84 President, Michael Bogart. “He truly understands the unique challenges facing modern law enforcement, and his steadfast commitment to our mission does not go unnoticed.” The”
National Federation of Independent Business
“Rep. Bresnahan has proven himself to be a strong friend to small business during his first term in Congress. He helped deliver one of the greatest wins for Main Street by voting to make the 20% Small Business Deduction permanent, NFIB’s top priority for the 119th Congress. We are proud to endorse him for re-election.” – Louis Bertolotti, NFIB Political Director.”
Advanced · 37,937 votes (100%) · 1 of 1 · Full results ↗
Lost · 128,714 votes (46%) · 2 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Election November 3, 2026 · 2 polls of this matchup
Each dot is a poll. A line is drawn from the third nonpartisan poll; there are 2 so far. How polls are read
Paige Cognetti won. The race has been called, but the count we have stopped at 85.28% reporting, so the polls are not measured against the margin.
| Poll | Paige Cognetti | Rob Bresnahan Jr. | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|
| The New York Times/Siena Universityended Oct 22 | 50.5% | 46.5% | Paige Cognetti +4.1 |
| Emerson Collegeended Oct 14 | 52% | 48% | Paige Cognetti +4 |
| Median of the final polls | Paige Cognetti +4.1 | ||
| Result, 85.28% reporting | 54.5% | 45.5% | — |
November 3, 2026 · Result · Each pollster's last poll ending in the 21 days before the vote, read for the two leading finishers; the median leaves out polls a side paid for; a margin is compared once 95% is reported
Poll data from The New York Times, licensed CC BY 4.0 · Updated November 10, 2026 · 3 polls paid for by a party or campaign are left out
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 10 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 79 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $2.3M.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 6,868 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.8M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 795 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.7M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $6,519,139
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
50% of the money placed by state came from inside Pennsylvania: $916.2K of $1.8M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,064 contributions · 50% | $916,198 |
| 777 contributions · 7.7% | $140,527 |
| 653 contributions · 5.4% | $99,881 |
| 129 contributions · 4.5% | $82,865 |
| 571 contributions · 3.4% | $62,555 |
| 179 contributions · 2.7% | $50,201 |
| 247 contributions · 2.4% | $44,047 |
| 55 contributions · 2.2% | $40,654 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 52 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 400 contributions · 18% of ranked | $139,010 |
| 6 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $9,000 |
| 6 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $7,010 |
| 4 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $947,720 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($799,992) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Bresnahan,’s campaign or spending on ads about Bresnahan, are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 40% to named individuals, 24% to organizations, 24% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 12% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Founder, Bloomberg Inc. · behind Everytown for GUN Safety Victory Fund and HMP and 2 more | $2.6M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind CLF | $1.7M |
| Person · CEO, Space Exploration Technologies Corp. · behind CLF and America PAC and 3 more | $1.5M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind HMP | $1.5M |
| Organization · behind Tomorrow Together | $843.9K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Everytown for GUN Safety Victory Fund | $656.1K |
| Person · Investments, Self-Employed · behind CLF | $544.8K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Cffe PAC and HMP | $516.7K |
| Person · Physician, Adelson Drug Clinic · behind CLF and Safety & Affordability PAC Inc. and 1 more | $451.2K |
| Person · Co-Founder, Ballmer Group · behind Everytown for GUN Safety Victory Fund and HMP | $332.1K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Giffords PAC | $297.8K |
| Organization · behind Safety & Affordability PAC Inc. and NO Going Back PAC Inc. | $268.5K |
Read for the 19 largest groups of 59, 97% of the $25.2M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $28,575 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $5,521,720
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,499 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
61 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $129,142 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 11 payments · 31% of all spending | $1,786,765 |
| 8 payments · 15% of all spending | $884,708 |
| 63 payments · 7.3% of all spending | $423,834 |
| 27 payments · 4.9% of all spending | $286,191 |
| 15 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $228,628 |
| 13 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $197,965 |
| 4 payments · 3.2% of all spending | $185,512 |
| 175 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $150,122 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 4,837 contributions · 38% of ranked | $550,498 |
| 69 contributions · 7.4% of ranked | $107,855 |
| 52 contributions · 4.4% of ranked | $64,542 |
| 62 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $57,237 |
| 75 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $49,703 |
| 22 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $33,715 |
| 14 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $33,010 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 28 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $26,394 |
A further $369,729 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($799,992) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.