Other political groupsClearly political, but nothing yet shows a cause or a side: not their own words, their funders or a published source.Political groupsPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00686832 · files monthly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$2.6M raised, $2.3M spent, $278.1K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
95% filed as other receipts · largest donor M. Quinn Delaney, $650K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$119.2K spent for candidates and $101.5K against them, most on NC-11 ($106K) · $1.2M given to candidates and committees, the largest to Texas Organizing Project PAC ($435K) · 100% of its support to Democrats. See where it goes
Where it spendsWhich races and candidates is its money for or against?
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$144.7K to 7 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $144,705
Democratic 100%
Against candidates $101,545
Republican 100%
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$1,165,500 in 20 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
9
$45.5K · 3.9%
Other PACs and committees
6
$1.1M · 96%
All recipients
15
$1.2M
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
Texas
4
$18.5K
Arizona
1
$10K
Florida
1
$5K
Nevada
1
$5K
Mississippi
1
$5K
Illinois
1
$2K
Recipients 15
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Joanna Mendoza2 receipts, latest Aug 19, 2026Mendoza for Congress · H6AZ06099$10K
Christian Menefee1 receipt, latest May 22, 2025Christian D. Menefee for Congress · H6TX18232$5K
James Talarico1 receipt, latest Jun 16, 2026Talarico for Texas · S6TX00479$5K
Greg Casar1 receipt, latest Sep 29, 2025Greg Casar for Congress · H2TX35144$3.5K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $2,580,434 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$2,452,88095%
Where it came from
Way To Win Action Fund Inc5 receipts, latest Sep 25, 2026 · Walnut, California$858,000
M. Quinn Delaney2 contributions, latest Aug 3, 2026 · RETIRED · NOT EMPLOYED · OAKLAND, CA$650,000
Anne Delaney4 contributions, latest Jan 13, 2026 · PHILANTROPHIST · SELF EMPLOYED · NEW YORK, NY$500,000
Lone Star Forward Fund1 receipt, latest Aug 24, 2026 · Austin, Texas$100,000
Agave Social Welfare Fund3 receipts, latest Aug 14, 2026 · Austin, Texas$80,000
Movement Voter PAC2 receipts, latest Oct 14, 2026 · Northampton, Massachusetts$50,000
David Habib2 contributions, latest May 28, 2025 · PRINCIPAL · DHJ CONSULTING · BELLEVUE, WA$50,000
Oona CoyOne contribution on Oct 5, 2026 · MARKET MANAGER · NORTHHAMPTON TUESDAY MARKET · NORTHAMPTON, MA$25,000
Samuel McVeetyOne contribution on May 28, 2026 · AREA TECH LEAD · GOOGLE · SEATTLE, WA$25,000
Gregory SpivyOne contribution on Apr 15, 2026 · FOUNDER · SPIVY PRIVATE CAPITAL · SAN FRANCISCO, CA$25,000
Sandor StrausOne contribution on Aug 6, 2026 · PRESIDENT · FIREDOLL FOUNDATION · LAFAYETTE, CA$25,000
David GastOne contribution on Oct 13, 2026 · RETIRED · NOT EMPLOYED · SAN FRANCISCO, CA$10,000
Laurence LebowitzOne contribution on Aug 16, 2025 · RETIRED · NOT EMPLOYED · BOSTON, MA$10,000
Kenneth BohanOne contribution on Aug 28, 2026 · RETIRED · NOT EMPLOYED · HOUSTON, TX$7,000
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $1.1M from 6 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$51,0252%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$48,1221.9%
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$23,4070.9%
Refunds and rebatesMoney coming back to the committee: rebates and refunds of what it spent, contributions it made that were returned, and loans it made that were repaid.$5,0000.2%
Total reported receipts $2,580,434
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $2.6M followed back through up to 3 committees
54% to named individuals, 7.1% to organizations, 33% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 1.9% to committees we could not follow, 3.8% not itemized.
Gave directly$2.4M 93%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Way To Win Action Fund IncOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 33%
$858,000
M. Quinn DelaneyPerson · Retired · Oakland, CA · also behind 2 other groups · 25%
$650,000
Anne DelaneyPerson · Philantrophist, Self Employed · New York, NY · also behind 1 other group · 19%
$500,000
Lone Star Forward FundOrganization · 3.9%
$100,000
Agave Social Welfare FundOrganization · 3.1%
$80,000
Not itemized by this committee2.3%
$58,370
David Habib
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $1,455,275 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $28.8K
$28.8K+
$115.3K+
$259.5K+
$461.2K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California10 contributions · 50%
$720,700
New York5 contributions · 34%
$500,500
Texas6 contributions · 6%
$88,000
Washington8 contributions · 5.6%
$80,850
Massachusetts5 contributions · 3.1%
$45,250
Rhode Island1 contribution · 0.3%
$5,000
Wisconsin1 contribution · 0.3%
$5,000
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $2,333,684 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Contributions to candidates and other committeesMoney given to federal candidates, party committees and other PACs.$1,170,50050%
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$792<0.1%
Total reported disbursements $2,333,684
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $2,326,550 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$1,892,66981%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$1,165,500
CONTRIBUTION MADE$251,000
NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: RESEARCH CONSULTING$112,500
NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: CONTRIBUTION MADE$107,000
NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: POLLING CONSULTING$61,250
NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: ADVERTISING - TV PRODUCTION COSTS$60,000
NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: MEDIA CONSULTING$30,000
NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: COMPLIANCE CONSULTING
Spending over time
$2.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.1M, September 2026.
$2.3M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$185,774
September 2026$1,136,616
August 2026$473,816
July 2026$113,448
June 2026$19,612
May 2026$2,797
April 2026$3,864
March 2026$53,341
February 2026$3,941
January 2026$5,150
December 2025$7,769
November 2025$199
October 2025$5,958
September 2025$252,739
August 2025$4,083
July 2025$3,600
June 2025$10,367
May 2025$28,702
April 2025$5,170
March 2025$2,630
February 2025$3,896
January 2025$10,211
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “WAY TO LEAD” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Elect TeresaHouse campaign committee · Connected to ELECT TERESA VICTORY FUND · 1 payment
$5K
Scott Colom for SenateSenate campaign committee · Connected to COLOM VICTORY FUND · 1 payment
$5K
$1.2M across 16 recipient committees, or 50% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Person · Principal, DHJ Consulting · Bellevue, WA · 1.9%
Samuel McVeetyPerson · Area Tech Lead, Google · Seattle, WA · 1%
$25,000
Gregory SpivyPerson · Founder, Spivy Private Capital · San Francisco, CA · 1%
$25,000
Show 1 more source
Gave directly, more
Name
Amount
Sandor StrausPerson · President, Firedoll Foundation · Lafayette, CA · 1%
$25,000
Through Change for Arizona 2024 PAC$48.1K 1.9%
Through Change for Arizona 2024 PAC
Name
Amount
Way to Lead PACCommittee, not followed further · Other political groups (proposed) · 1.9%
$48,122
Through Movement Voter PAC$28.8K 1.1%
Through Movement Voter PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Movement Voter PAC1.1%
$28,795
79 smaller sources, $107.1K in all (4.2%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Oregon6 contributions · 0.2%
$3,400
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 25 contributions · 51% of ranked
$698,250
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 7 contributions · 37% of ranked
$512,500
DHJ Consulting2 contributions · 3.7% of ranked
$50,000
Google2 contributions · 1.8% of ranked
$25,250
Firedoll Foundation1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked
$25,000
Northhampton Tuesday Market1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked
$25,000
Spivy Private Capital1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked
$25,000
Eccles MGT Co1 contribution · 0.4% of ranked
$5,000
A further $85,500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($23,407) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 8 contributions · 50% of ranked
$684,400
Philantrophist4 contributions · 37% of ranked
$500,000
Principal2 contributions · 3.7% of ranked
$50,000
Area Tech Lead1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked
$25,000
Founder1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked
$25,000
Market Manager1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked
$25,000
President1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked
$25,000
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 17 contributions · 1% of ranked
$13,850
A further $85,500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($23,407) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
HIT Strategies1 payment · latest Jul 28, 2026 · NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: RESEARCH CONSULTING$112,500
Texas Organizing Project PAC2 payments · latest Sep 30, 2026 · ADVERTISING TV - PRODUCTION COSTS$90,000
Intrvl1 payment · latest Aug 27, 2026 · NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: POLLING CONSULTING$61,250
Fulcrum PAC1 payment · latest Sep 4, 2026 · NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: ADVERTISING - TV PRODUCTION COSTS$60,000
Way to Lead Nevada1 payment · latest Sep 12, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION MADE$59,550
Way to Lead Arizona1 payment · latest Sep 12, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION MADE$59,550
Way to Lead Texas1 payment · latest Sep 12, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION MADE$59,550
Way to Lead Georgia1 payment · latest Sep 12, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION MADE$59,550
Lupe Votes Federal Super PAC, Inc.1 payment · latest Sep 30, 2026 · MEDIA - PRODUCTION COSTS$56,750
The Money Wheel, LLC8 payments · latest Oct 2, 2026 · NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: COMPLIANCE CONSULTING$32,579
Hued LLC1 payment · latest Sep 21, 2026 · NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: MEDIA CONSULTING$30,000
$27,025
NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: MEDIA - PRODUCTION COSTS$22,750
NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: GENERAL CAMPAIGN CONSULTING$20,000
NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: SOFTWARE$15,051
NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT : LUNCH EVENT$10,000
Paid to
Fulcrum PAC$460,000
Texas Organizing Project PAC$443,000
Victory PAC$114,750
HIT Strategies$112,500
Our Voice Our Vote Arizona PAC$108,000
Lupe Votes Federal Super PAC, Inc.$100,000
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$220.8K of it was independent spending for Jamie Ager and against Jennifer Balkcom and 4 more$359,50015%
Filed as
Advertising - TV BuyIndependent spending: $54K in support of Jamie Ager · $46K in opposition to Jennifer Balkcom and 4 more$200,000
ADVERTISING TV - PRODUCTION COSTS$82,000
MEDIA - PRODUCTION COSTSIndependent spending: $4K in support of Johnny Garcia · $4K in support of James Talarico and 4 more$77,500
Paid to
WKQ MediaIndependent spending: $54K in support of Jamie Ager · $46K in opposition to Jennifer Balkcom and 4 more$200,000
Texas Organizing Project PAC$82,000
Lupe Votes Federal Super PAC, Inc.$56,750
Challengers, LLCIndependent spending: $4K in support of Johnny Garcia · $4K in support of James Talarico and 4 more$20,750
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$58,1222.5%
Filed as
LIST ACQUISITION$48,122
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING$10,000
Paid to
Change for Arizona 2024 PAC$48,122
Authentic Campaigns$10,000
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$6,9930.3%
Filed as
COMPLIANCE CONSULTING$6,993
Paid to
The Money Wheel, LLC$6,393
Change for Arizona 2024 PAC$600
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$3,7300.2%
Filed as
NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEE$2,140
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEE$1,590
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$3,730
Payroll and staffSalaries, wages, benefits, and payroll services.$3,6830.2%
Filed as
TRAVEL AND STAFF TIME$3,683
Paid to
Texas Democratic Party$3,683
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$1,854<0.1%
Filed as
BANK FEE$1,515
MERCHANT FEE$340
Paid to
Amalgamated Bank$1,515
Paragon Payment Solutions$340
Total itemized disbursements $2,326,550
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 201 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Texas Organizing Project PAC2 payments · 3.9% of all spending
$90,000
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
HIT Strategies1 payment, latest Jul 28, 2026NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: RESEARCH CONSULTING$112.5K
