Electing women's & communities' candidatesGroups whose purpose is electing, or mobilizing voters for, candidates from a shared community: women, or Black, Latino, Asian American and Pacific Islander candidates, among others. The community has to be an identity people share, not an age bracket or a political stance.Causes
Sylvia Garcia▲ For · House, TX-29All in newer notices, latest Oct 22, 2026 · FEC filing$25.6K
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
Why this committee exists In its own words
“Texas is a battleground state, and Texas Organizing Project (TOP) PAC’s aim is to further push the state toward a progressive future that will deliver substantive change and shift more power into the hands of Black and Latino Texans.”
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Its site sums up what it stands for in the statement above, and publishes no list of positions beyond it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$944.6K to 6 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $944,601
Democratic 100%
Against candidates $252,300
Republican 100%
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Keep AL Green in CongressHouse campaign committee · Connected to OKLAHOMANS FOR AL GREEN · 1 payment
$500
$815.5K from 4 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $3,610,134 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$3,593,25199.5%
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $2.6M from 23 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$8,0000.2%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$7,7500.2%
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$1,114<0.1%
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$19<0.1%
Total reported receipts $3,610,134
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $3.6M followed back through up to 3 committees
39% to named individuals, 34% to organizations, 4.2% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 23% not itemized.
Gave directly$2M 55%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Green Advocacy ProjectOrganization · 15%
$550,000
Steven C. PhillipsPerson · Attorney, Self-Employed · San Francisco, CA · 9.4%
$340,000
Karla JurvetsonPerson · Physician, Self-Employed · Los Altos, CA · also behind 3 other groups · 8.9%
$320,000
Texas Organizing ProjectOrganization · 5.8%
$210,324
Texas For AllOrganization · 3.3%
$120,000
The Dripps Phinney Family TrustOrganization · 2.8%
$100,000
Rachel GelmanPerson · Director of Programs, Jewish Yough for Community Act · Oakland, CA · also behind 1 other group · 2.2%
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $1,570,639 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $34.2K
$34.2K+
$137K+
$308.2K+
$547.8K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California18 contributions · 55%
$856,000
Texas314 contributions · 35%
$549,589
Virginia7 contributions · 6.5%
$102,200
Indiana1 contribution · 1.3%
$20,000
Massachusetts6 contributions · 1%
$16,000
Washington1 contribution · 0.6%
$10,000
District of Columbia
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $2,290,938 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$1,395,45361%
Paid to
Texas Power Strategies14 payments · latest Oct 7, 2026 · NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - CANVASSING SERVICES$844,053
Brandon HerreraOppose · 2 records · latest Oct 9, 2026$13,650
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$18,6110.8%
Paid to
Perfect Gift3 payments · latest Oct 13, 2026 · GAS CARDS$18,329
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$15<0.1%
Total reported disbursements $2,290,938
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $2,287,891 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$1,384,47961%
$2.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $745.3K, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
$2.3M12
Jan 2025Nov 2026
1Mar 3, 2026 primary, TX-SEN$198.6K of its independent spending was aimed at it
2Nov 3, 2026 general election, TX-SEN$488.4K of its independent spending was aimed at it
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending. The line stops at the latest report, through Oct 14, 2026, at the dashed rule; elections after it are marked where they fall.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$478,540
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$745,347
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$27,849
Feb 12 – Mar 31, 2026$637,713
Jan 1 – Feb 11, 2026$138,419
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$44,718
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$218,351
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
Filings covered
Through Oct 14, 2026
Data source
FEC bulk filing data
Texas Organizing Project PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (nonqualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Texas Organizing Project PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Structured organization facts
Identity match
Editorially reviewed organization match
Match confidence
low
Source coverage
Official pages captured
20
LittleSis classifications
Organization, Political Fundraising Committee
Last captured
Sep 29, 2026
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
$80,000
California Nurses Association PACOrganization · 2.1%
Judy FiskinPerson · Artist, Cal Arts · Los Angeles, CA · 0.7%
$25,000
Margery E. LoebPerson · Hammond, IN · 0.6%
$20,000
Through Talarico for Texas$406.2K 11%
Through Talarico for Texas
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Talarico for Texas11%
$406,234
Through Way To Lead PACOther political groups (proposed)$344.7K 9.5%
Through Way To Lead PAC
Name
Amount
Way To Win Action Fund IncOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 4.1%
$147,298
M. Quinn DelaneyPerson · Retired · Oakland, CA · also behind 3 other groups · 3.1%
$111,590
Anne DelaneyPerson · Philantrophist, Self Employed · New York, NY · also behind 1 other group · 2.4%
$85,838
Through Movement Voter PAC$281.8K 7.8%
Through Movement Voter PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Movement Voter PAC7.3%
$262,036
Buelow Bambini LLCOrganization · 0.5%
$19,808
Through American Federation of State County & Municipal Employees P E O P L EPublic employees & teachers$56.4K 1.6%
Through American Federation of State County & Municipal Employees P E O P L E
Name
Amount
Not itemized by American Federation of State County & Municipal Employees P E O P L E1.6%
$56,419
Through Texas for All Victory Fund$50.7K 1.4%
Through Texas for All Victory Fund
Name
Amount
Jordan Delaney Family TrustOrganization · 1.4%
$50,676
500 smaller sources, $483.7K in all (13%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
6 contributions · 0.4%
$6,300
New Jersey6 contributions · 0.4%
$6,000
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 36 contributions · 77% of ranked
$711,560
Jewish Yough For Community ACT2 contributions · 8.7% of ranked
$80,000
CAL Arts1 contribution · 2.7% of ranked
$25,000
Fikes Family Office1 contribution · 2.7% of ranked
$25,000
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 8 contributions · 1.5% of ranked
$14,000
Harris County2 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$10,000
WEA - Cascade Uniserv Council1 contribution · 1.1% of ranked
$10,000
Bexar County3 contributions · 0.6% of ranked
$5,250
A further $648,737 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,114) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Attorney57 contributions · 39% of ranked
$391,735
Physician21 contributions · 32% of ranked
$320,950
Director Of Programs2 contributions · 8% of ranked
$80,000
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 55 contributions · 6.2% of ranked
$62,238
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 58 contributions · 5.7% of ranked
$57,615
Artist1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked
$25,000
Commissioner2 contributions · 1% of ranked
$10,000
Representative1 contribution · 1% of ranked
$10,000
A further $567,884 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,114) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Field and canvassingDoor-to-door canvassing, phone banks and calls to voters, petition and signature gathering, and get-out-the-vote work.$334.2K of it was independent spending for Jasmine Crockett and for James Talarico and 3 more$334,21115%
Filed as
CanvassingIndependent spending: $113.6K in support of Jasmine Crockett · $20.8K in support of Sylvia R. Garcia and 1 more$139,798
Canvassing (Actual)Independent spending: $50.6K in support of James Talarico · $36K in support of Christian Menefee and 2 more$99,213
Texas Power StrategiesIndependent spending: $113.6K in support of Jasmine Crockett · $98.2K in support of James Talarico and 3 more$334,211
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$320.8K of it was independent spending against Warren Kenneth Paxton Jr. and for James Talarico and 3 more$320,79214%
Digital & TV Advertising (Estimate)Independent spending: $22.8K in support of Katy Padilla Stout · $22.8K in support of James Talarico and 2 more$70,000
Media Production & Digital Advertising - ActualIndependent spending in support of Christian Menefee$792
Human AGE DigitalIndependent spending in support of Christian Menefee$792
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$90K of it was independent spending against Warren Kenneth Paxton Jr. and for James Talarico and 2 more$90,0003.9%
Filed as
In-Kind: Production Services (Actual) (From Way to Lead PAC)Independent spending: $51.3K in opposition to Warren Kenneth Paxton Jr. · $30.8K in support of James Talarico$82,000
In-Kind: Production Services (Estimate) (From Way to Lead PAC)Independent spending: $2.6K in support of Katy Padilla Stout · $2.6K in support of James Talarico and 2 more$8,000
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$69K of it was independent spending for Jasmine Crockett and for Sylvia R. Garcia and 3 more$68,9643%
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$35.3K of it was independent spending for James Talarico and for Jasmine Crockett and 3 more$53,6342.3%
Ruiz, Elisabeth AnitaIndependent spending in support of Jasmine Crockett$165
Payroll and staffSalaries, wages, benefits, and payroll services.$27.6K of it was independent spending for Jasmine Crockett and for James Talarico and 3 more$27,5881.2%
Filed as
Staff Salaries & BenefitsIndependent spending: $13.6K in support of Jasmine Crockett · $2.6K in support of Sylvia R. Garcia and 1 more$16,939
Staff Salaries & Benefits (Actual)Independent spending: $5.5K in support of James Talarico · $3K in support of Christian Menefee and 1 more$10,649
Paid to
Texas Organizing ProjectIndependent spending: $13.6K in support of Jasmine Crockett · $5.5K in support of James Talarico and 3 more$27,588
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$5,7240.3%
Refunds and redesignationsContributions returned to donors or reassigned to another election.$2,5000.1%
Filed as
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - NON-FED ADVERTISING DUPLICATE PAYMENT; SEE REFUND TO CMTE IN NEXT PERIOD$2,500
Paid to
Human AGE Digital$2,500
Total itemized disbursements $2,287,891
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 473 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Texas Power Strategies35 payments · 51% of all spending
$1,178,264
WKQ Media6 payments · 14% of all spending
$320,000
Texas Organizing Project25 payments · 8.8% of all spending
$202,231
Challengers LLC6 payments · 3.9% of all spending
$90,000
Perfect Gift28 payments · 3.8% of all spending
$88,050
Katz Compliance17 payments · 3.1% of all spending
$72,126
Alamo Mailing3 payments · 2.7% of all spending
$61,759
Connor, Elizabeth14 payments · 2.2% of all spending
$51,159
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Texas Power Strategies14 payments, latest Oct 7, 2026NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - CANVASSING SERVICES$844.1K