This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$497,000 in 11 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Other PACs and committees
7
$497K · 100%
All recipients
7
$497K
By the candidate’s state
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $260K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
$497K across 7 recipient committees, or 2.2% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $22,970,124 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$21,109,68392%
Where it came from
Buelow Bambini LLC1 receipt, latest Jun 1, 2026 · San Francisco, California$1,000,000
Carolina Federation Freedom PAC1 receipt, latest Mar 5, 2026 · Durham, North Carolina$675,000
Gregg Oppenheimer12 contributions, latest Feb 27, 2026 · WRITER/CONSULTANT · SELF-EMPLOYED · SANTA MONICA, CA$550,000
Dan Klingessrow2 contributions, latest Aug 4, 2026 · GRAPHIC DESIGNER · WMATA · MOUNT RAINIER, MD$500,000
Teresa Klingessrow2 contributions, latest Aug 4, 2026 · SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST · NATIONAL THERAPY CENTER · MOUNT RAINIER, MD$500,000
Carolyn J. Johnson2 contributions, latest Nov 19, 2025 · PRIVATE INVESTOR · SELF-EMPLOYED · SEBASTOPOL, CA$400,000
James T. Campen4 contributions, latest Mar 3, 2026 · RETIRED · N/A · CAMBRIDGE, MA$380,000
Rachel E. Gelman5 contributions, latest Feb 19, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · N/A · COVINA, CA$204,000
Ellen Koshland4 contributions, latest Jul 22, 2026 · ARTIST, EDUCATIONALIST AND DIRECTOR · SELF-EMPLOYED · MENLO PARK, CA$200,000
Allison Thomas4 contributions, latest Feb 20, 2026 · PRODUCER · SELF-EMPLOYED · LOS ANGELES, CA$200,000
ACLU New Hampshire Foundation2 receipts, latest Sep 8, 2026 · Concord, New Hampshire$100,000
Amalgamated Bank15 receipts, latest Sep 30, 2026 · New York, New York$14,336
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $1.8M from 5 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$1,844,9008%
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$13,037<0.1%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$2,500<0.1%
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$4<0.1%
Total reported receipts $22,970,124
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $23M followed back through up to 3 committees
35% to named individuals, 7.8% to organizations, 58% not itemized.
Totty, Melanie1 payment · latest Sep 24, 2026 · IN KIND CONTRIBUTION RECEIVED FOR FUNDRAISING RAFFLE - GIFTS FOR SUPPORTERS$250
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$35,6640.2%
Total reported disbursements $22,267,649
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $22,338,617 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$21,967,91098%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION - NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$5,859,940
NON - FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$5,810,000
SALARY AND BENEFITS, PAYROLL TAXES, UTILITIES - NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$469,670
SALARY AND BENEFITS - NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$439,024
NON - FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION - NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT
Spending over time
$22.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $4.6M, September 2026.
$22.3M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$1,396,122
September 2026$4,634,928
August 2026$1,645,188
July 2026$2,064,201
June 2026$1,636,955
May 2026$1,743,611
April 2026$1,221,437
March 2026$366,505
February 2026$2,017,401
January 2026$84,574
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$3,504,729
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$1,951,999
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “MOVEMENT VOTER” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Rachael RossPerson · Postdoctoral Researcher, Columbia University · Carrboro, NC · 0.7%
$150,000
Gretchen SandlerPerson · San Francisco, CA · 0.7%
$150,000
James SandlerPerson · San Francisco, CA · 0.7%
$150,000
Becky SilversteinPerson · Jamaica Plain, MA · 0.7%
$150,000
Suzanne BlakePerson · Louisville, KY · 0.6%
$140,000
Amy MandelPerson · Retired · Asheville, NC · 0.6%
$140,000
Madelyn JackrelPerson · Pacific Palisades, CA · 0.6%
$137,500
David BlairPerson · Dublin, NH · 0.5%
$125,000
Sally GoodwinPerson · Retired · Langley, WA · 0.5%
$122,750
26 smaller sources, $2.2M in all (9.4%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
1,982 contributions · 8.1%
$1,714,102
Maryland530 contributions · 6%
$1,273,317
New York1,700 contributions · 4.8%
$1,010,818
New Hampshire126 contributions · 3.5%
$745,780
North Carolina299 contributions · 2.8%
$601,230
Illinois652 contributions · 2.3%
$479,786
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 2,798 contributions · 35% of ranked
$2,939,862
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 42 contributions · 6.7% of ranked
$566,825
National Therapy Center2 contributions · 5.9% of ranked
$500,000
Wmata2 contributions · 5.9% of ranked
$500,000
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 108 contributions · 3.5% of ranked
$296,618
Columbia University9 contributions · 3.1% of ranked
$261,252
Elsevier INC34 contributions · 2.7% of ranked
$223,417
Google99 contributions · 1.9% of ranked
$162,320
A further $11,484,924 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($13,037) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 12,423 contributions · 35% of ranked
$6,508,874
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 896 contributions · 21% of ranked
$3,776,156
Graphic Designer8 contributions · 2.7% of ranked
$501,730
Speech Language Pathologist13 contributions · 2.7% of ranked
$501,000
Self-employedWritten instead of an occupation · 298 contributions · 2.5% of ranked
$465,695
Writer/consultant7 contributions · 2.4% of ranked
$440,000
Private Investor2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked
$400,000
Physician632 contributions · 1.7% of ranked
$310,138
A further $2,053,042 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($13,037) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
$385,000
NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$190,000
NON -FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$150,000
NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$120,000
Paid to
Working Families Party PAC$1,907,000
Carolina Federation Freedom PAC$1,025,000
Working Families Party National PAC$679,500
Texas Organizing Project PAC$540,000
Faith in Minnesota Action$525,000
Movement Voter Project$495,543
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$346,3791.6%
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEES - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$59
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$346,341
Shopify$38
Refunds and redesignationsContributions returned to donors or reassigned to another election.$10,250<0.1%
Filed as
REFUND - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$10,000
REFUND - NON- CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$250
Paid to
Diwanji, Pavani$8,000
Matthews, Robert$1,000
Penn-Tracy, Jina$500
Valentine, Stuart$500
Johansson, Carl$250
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$7,875<0.1%
Filed as
ADVERTISING CONSULTING$7,875
Paid to
Tandem Design LLC$7,875
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$5,036<0.1%
Filed as
BANK FEES$5,036
Paid to
Amalgamated Bank$5,036
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$587<0.1%
Filed as
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING$347
STATE ADVISING AND FUNDRAISING SERVICES$240
Paid to
Mendelsohn, Gettleman & Associates$347
Mack, Tony$240
Not broken out by the committeeReported as a lump sum, with memo entries pointed to for the detail. Where those entries were filed and read, this page counts the payees they name instead; what is left here was never itemised.$580<0.1%
Filed as
REIMBURSEMENT-NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT-SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED; SALARY, TRAVEL. FUNDRAISING CONSULTING$580
Paid to
Movement Voter Project$580
Total itemized disbursements $22,338,617
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,218 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
7 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $458,754 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Working Families Party PAC19 payments · 8.6% of all spending
$1,907,000
Carolina Federation Freedom PAC5 payments · 4.6% of all spending
$1,025,000
Movement Voter Project9 payments · 4.3% of all spending
$954,877
Working Families Party National PAC11 payments · 3.1% of all spending
$679,500
Faith in Minnesota Action5 payments · 2.4% of all spending
$525,000
Victory PAC9 payments · 1.9% of all spending
$426,000
New Virginia Majority5 payments · 1.6% of all spending
$360,000
Workers Vote9 payments · 1.6% of all spending
$355,000
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Working Families Party PAC19 payments, latest Sep 25, 2026NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION - NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$1.9M