Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › NC-11 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, NC-11
Has not served in Congress
Jennifer Balkcom’s words are not shown
FEC filings, Jul 1, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00958785
26¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 2 reports ($104.7K of $399.5K). Cash on hand went from $295.1K on Sep 30, 2026 to $294.8K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $355,135 | $60,050 | $295,085 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $44,357 | $44,624 | $294,818 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 84 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $267.7K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 154 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $150.2K.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 1 transfer was filed this cycle, totaling $42.2K.
Total reported receipts $399,492
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
44% of the money placed by state came from inside North Carolina: $65.6K of $150.2K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 78 contributions · 44% | $65,618 |
| 24 contributions · 20% | $29,541 |
| 3 contributions · 9.3% | $14,000 |
| 7 contributions · 6.4% |
What the committees giving to Balkcom’s campaign or spending on ads about Balkcom are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 30% to named individuals, 27% to organizations, 34% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 8.2% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Your Community PAC and HMP | $1.2M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind HMP and SD 2026 | $1.2M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind LCV Victory Fund | $605.3K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind EDF Action Votes | $575.5K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Cffe PAC and HMP | $447.8K |
The campaign also refunded $12,905 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 31% of all spending | $32,837 |
| 1 payment · 20% of all spending | $21,000 |
| 1 payment · 18% of all spending | $18,981 |
| 1 payment · 2.5% of all spending | $2,568 |
| 2 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $2,419 |
| 1 payment · 2.1% of all spending | $2,177 |
| 1 payment · 2% of all spending | $2,137 |
| 1 payment · 2% of all spending | $2,100 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
No endorsements page
Lost · 141,645 votes (41%) · 2 of 3 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · Emerson College, Oct 14, 2026 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
| $9,541 |
| 25 contributions · 6% | $9,076 |
| 1 contribution · 2.4% | $3,644 |
| 1 contribution · 2.3% | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.3% | $3,500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 19 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 77 contributions · 36% of ranked | $54,517 |
| Written instead of an employer · 9 contributions · 8.8% of ranked | $13,260 |
| 1 contribution · 4.5% of ranked | $6,800 |
| 2 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.3% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.3% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.3% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.3% of ranked | $3,500 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($8,789) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 76 contributions · 36% of ranked | $54,267 |
| 6 contributions · 6% of ranked | $9,000 |
| 8 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $8,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.5% of ranked | $6,800 |
| 3 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $5,541 |
| 2 contributions · 3% of ranked | $4,500 |
| 3 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $4,250 |
| 1 contribution · 2.3% of ranked | $3,500 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($8,789) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
| Organization · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and Maga Inc. |
| $401.9K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Your Community PAC and AB PAC and 1 more | $376.5K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Project 218 and AB PAC | $368.6K |
| Person · Chairman, Hendricks Holding Co Inc. · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and Maga Inc. | $344.5K |
| Person · Founder, Bloomberg Inc. · behind HMP and LCV Victory Fund and 1 more | $335.6K |
| Organization · behind Your Community PAC | $299.2K |
| Person · Director of Community Development, LAS Vegas Sands Corp. · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and Maga Inc. | $287.1K |
Read for the 18 largest groups of 46, 98% of the $17.5M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
Total itemized disbursements $93,815
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 37 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.