Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
Koch networkThe network of committees tied to Charles Koch, including Americans for Prosperity. Placed from our list of that network, which a reviewer confirms.Political groups
Hybrid PAC (nonqualified)Arlington, VirginiaActive
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00687103 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $78.6M from 35 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $115,337,220
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
29% to named individuals, 62% to organizations, 5.7% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 3.3% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · 26% | $30,000,000 |
| Organization · 23% | $26,000,000 |
| Organization · 8.7% | $10,000,000 |
| Person · Philanthropist, Self-Employed · Bentonville, AR · also behind 3 other groups · 6.1% | $7,000,000 |
| Organization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 5.6% | $6,500,000 |
| Person · Retired · Bentonville, AR · 4.3% | $5,000,000 |
| 3.3% | $3,844,391 |
| Organization · 1.7% | $2,000,000 |
| Person · Executive Chair Emeritus, The Duchossois Group · Chicago, IL · also behind 3 other groups · 1.7% | $2,000,000 |
| Person · Retired · Sanibel, FL · 1.7% | $2,000,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Co-Founder DIR. and Exec. Chairman, Ares Management · Sherman Oaks, CA · 1.7% | $2,000,000 |
| Person · Retired · Bentonville, AR · 1.7% | $2,000,000 |
| Person · Homemaker · Holland, MI · 1.3% | $1,500,000 |
| Person · Chairman Emeritus, Haworth Inc. · Holland, MI · 1.3% | $1,500,000 |
| Organization · 1.2% | $1,439,521 |
| Organization · 1.1% | $1,258,995 |
| Person · CEO, Cholla Petroleum Inc. · Dallas, TX · 1% | $1,208,038 |
| Person · Manager, Cumberland Development · Charlottesville, VA · also behind 1 other group · 0.9% | $1,000,000 |
| Organization · 0.8% | $923,905 |
| Person · Partner, AQR Capital · New York, NY · also behind 4 other groups · 0.7% | $750,000 |
57 smaller sources, $7.4M in all (6.4%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 40 contributions · 35% | $40,310,085 |
| 104 contributions · 33% | $36,961,553 |
| 16 contributions · 13% | $14,655,150 |
| 86 contributions · 3.9% | $4,456,655 |
| 149 contributions · 3.5% | $4,026,199 |
| 180 contributions · 2.7% | $3,071,575 |
| 178 contributions · 2.5% | $2,792,922 |
| 68 contributions · 2% | $2,239,562 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,425 contributions · 35% of ranked | $12,721,464 |
| Written instead of an employer · 130 contributions · 22% of ranked | $8,054,300 |
| 2 contributions · 5.8% of ranked | $2,100,000 |
| 1 contribution · 5.5% of ranked | $2,000,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 15 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $1,507,150 |
| 4 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $1,500,500 |
| 1 contribution · 3.3% of ranked | $1,208,038 |
| 2 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $1,000,000 |
A further $77,269,018 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,422 contributions · 35% of ranked | $12,715,339 |
| 2 contributions · 19% of ranked | $7,000,000 |
| 2 contributions · 5.8% of ranked | $2,100,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 21 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $2,007,900 |
| 1 contribution · 5.5% of ranked | $2,000,000 |
| 4 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $1,575,000 |
| 7 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $1,337,788 |
| 11 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $1,062,100 |
A further $77,268,693 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $83,629,340
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $83,645,556
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 2,154 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 76 payments · 30% of all spending | $24,799,301 |
| 486 payments · 23% of all spending | $18,910,000 |
| 107 payments · 21% of all spending | $17,355,810 |
| 282 payments · 6.7% of all spending | $5,600,247 |
| 174 payments · 4.8% of all spending | $3,984,309 |
| 30 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $2,254,464 |
| 82 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $1,578,493 |
| 309 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $1,281,020 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
$86.2M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $27.9M, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending. The line stops at the latest report, through Oct 14, 2026, at the dashed rule; elections after it are marked where they fall.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 1,087 payments totaling $18.7M.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Americans for Prosperity Action, Inc. DBA CVA Action & DBA Libre Action is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (nonqualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
Americans for Prosperity Action, Inc. DBA CVA Action & DBA Libre Action is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.