Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › Ohio U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, Ohio
Senator since 2025
Jon Husted’s words are not shown
99% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 12 times in the 119th Congress.
Senate Committee on Appropriations
Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Husted’s 57 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 22, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00896019
79¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($15.6M of $19.9M). Cash on hand went from $948.4K on Mar 31, 2025 to $4.2M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $1,061,114 | $112,726 | $948,389 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $2,004,481 | $302,406 | $2,650,464 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $2,774,632 | $397,313 | $5,027,783 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $1,508,473 | $572,817 | $5,963,439 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $2,909,123 | $632,607 | $8,239,955 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 15, 2026 | $260,995 | $339,789 | $8,161,161 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $3,831,806 | $2,574,148 | $9,418,818 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $4,848,736 | $5,384,261 | $8,883,293 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $686,023 | $5,330,219 | $4,239,097 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
184 endorsers listed on Jon Husted’s own campaign site: 1 party, 172 officials, 3 unions, 8 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
“Receiving the endorsement of the Ohio Republican Party—alongside President Trump’s recent endorsement—shows the strong momentum we’re building for the 2026 election,” said Husted. “When Republicans in Ohio unite, we win. This early and overwhelming support is a critical step on the road to victory.” “This was a no-brainer. With Jon Husted, we know exactly what we’re getting—a proven conservative with years of service and results to back it up. He’s united Republicans around his values and vision for Ohio. Our party stands firmly behind him,” said Ohio Republican Party Chairman Alex Triantafilou.”
Ohio Auditor
“Sherrod Brown spent almost half a century in elected office selling out Ohioans to the radical left,” said Faber. “Ohio needs Jon Husted in the U.S. Senate to deliver on President Trump’s promise to make America great again.”
U.S. Rep (OH-08)
“Jon Husted has a strong track record of advocating for our families and their future,” Davidson said. “His leadership is crucial to ensuring our values continue to have a voice in Washington.” “I am grateful to have the endorsement of Congressman Warren Davidson,” Husted said. “Together, we will continue to fight for policies that empower freedom-loving Ohioans to continue building their American dream right here.”
U.S. Rep (OH-14)
“Jon Husted has a proven record of fighting for Ohioans and delivering results that matter,” Joyce said. “His leadership is essential for navigating the challenges ahead and ensuring a brighter future for the next generation of Ohioans.” “Congressman Dave Joyce has been a steady, effective voice for Northeast Ohio and a national leader in protecting Lake Erie—one of our region’s greatest economic and natural assets,” Husted said. “I’m proud to have his support as we continue working together to protect our water, strengthen our economy, and create more opportunity for the families who call this region home.”
U.S. Rep (OH-05)
“Jon Husted has a proven record of standing up for Ohioans and delivering results that matter,” Latta said. “His leadership is essential for addressing the challenges we face and ensuring a prosperous future for our state.”
U.S. Rep (OH-04)
“Jon Husted has consistently stood up for the principles that matter most to us: limited government, personal freedoms and protecting the rule of law,” Jordan said. “His dedication to Ohio’s working families has been unwavering, and I am confident he will continue to deliver on our shared mission in Washington.”
U.S. Rep (OH-12)
“I am proud to endorse my friend, Senator Jon Husted, a proven conservative who has spent his career fighting for Ohio values and delivering results for Ohio families. Jon Husted has earned the trust of Ohioans time and again, as our secretary of state, lieutenant governor and now as United States senator. In each role, he fought for election integrity, lower taxes and opportunities for Ohio workers – policies that put Ohio first. His record is built on delivering results.”
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18
“Senator Husted has been great to the Operating Engineers, and we are excited to get behind his reelection,” Business Manager Michael Bertolone of IUOE Local 18 said. “We want results, not pandering. We trust Jon to continue championing the interests of Ohio’s workers.”
National Border Patrol Council
“Ohio’s Building Trades Unions have a great friend and advocate in Jon Husted,” said David Wondolowski, Executive Secretary and Business Manager of the Cleveland Building & Construction Trades Council. “We appreciate and support an ally like him in the U.S. Senate. He has always stood firmly with our working men and women, and today we proudly stand with him.” “Ohio’s law enforcement officers risk their lives every day to keep our communities safe, and they deserve leaders who have their backs,” Husted said. “I’m honored to earn the FOP’s endorsement. They know what’s at stake because they’ve lived the consequences of Sherrod Brown’s record: during his 32 years in Washington, Brown voted eight times to fund sanctuary cities and supported amnesty for 11 million illegal immigrants. I’ll always stand with our police, secure the border and fight for the safety of Ohio families.”
Northwest Ohio Building & Construction Trades Council
“Jon has been a friend both personally and professionally to every working man and woman who comprise our 18 labor unions,” said Council Executive Secretary Shaun Enright. “We know Jon will continue to fight for us in the Senate, and that’s why we have his back in northwest Ohio.” “I am honored to receive the support of the Northwest Ohio Building & Construction Trades Council. Like my own family, the men and women of these 18 labor unions have built their lives and opportunities right here in Northwest Ohio,” said Senator Husted. “They deserve leaders who turn words into action, and I will continue to push for policies that strengthen workforce training and keep Ohio a place where workers can thrive.”
“Ohio’s cattle producers need leaders who understand agriculture, respect rural communities and will stand up for farm families in Washington,” said Lindsey Hall, president of the Ohio Cattlemen’s Association. “Jon Husted has consistently shown that he listens to producers and supports policies that strengthen Ohio’s beef industry, protect our ability to operate and keep agriculture competitive. He understands that a strong ag economy is critical to Ohio’s future, and we are proud to endorse Jon Husted for the United States Senate.”
National Federation of Independent Business
“Jon Husted has been a true, long-time friend of small businesses in Ohio,” said Jared Weiser, NFIB Ohio State Director. “At the Ohio Statehouse, he had a 100% NFIB voting record, and his work jumpstarted Ohio’s economic turnaround. As Secretary of State, he made Ohio the quickest and least costly state in the Midwest to start and maintain a business. We know Senator Husted will continue to be a champion for the small business community in the U.S. Senate and we are confident Ohioans will join us in supporting his re-election in November.”
“Jon Husted has proven he is a results-driven leader who understands how to work effectively across state and federal governments,” McColley said. “His track record of success at every level of public service makes him the right choice to represent Ohio in the U.S. Senate. We are proud to endorse Jon Husted and look forward to continuing our work together to advance our values in Washington.” “I am honored to have the endorsement of the Ohio Senate Republicans,” Husted said. “Together, we will continue fighting for policies that grow our economy, strengthen our communities for working families, and protect the midwestern values Ohioans believe in.”
Advanced · 0 votes (0%) · 1 of 1 · Full results ↗
Lost · 2,077,748 votes (45%) · 2 of 7 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Sherrod Brown leads Jon Husted by 3.1 pointsAverage of the 5 latest nonpartisan polls
Latest poll · Emerson College, Nov 1, 2026
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 12 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 78 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $7.2M.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 61,577 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $7.5M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 1,029 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $3M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $19,894,786
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 22, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
35% of the money placed by state came from inside Ohio: $2.6M of $7.6M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 7,419 contributions · 35% | $2,630,782 |
| 7,962 contributions · 9.6% | $732,755 |
| 1,528 contributions · 6.5% | $492,715 |
| 4,109 contributions · 6.3% | $475,021 |
| 7,635 contributions · 5.4% | $412,946 |
| 2,953 contributions · 4.1% | $312,593 |
| 2,229 contributions · 2.4% | $179,897 |
| 1,429 contributions · 2.1% | $160,634 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 53 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 54,294 contributions · 56% of ranked | $2,855,593 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,647 contributions · 7.5% of ranked | $384,951 |
| Written instead of an employer · 296 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $280,110 |
| 9 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $41,000 |
| 3 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $35,000 |
| 15 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $28,026 |
| 4 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $26,800 |
| 4 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $26,400 |
A further $137,834 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,915,599) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Husted’s campaign or spending on ads about Husted are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 29% to named individuals, 50% to organizations, 15% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 6.1% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · behind Winsenate and Defend the Vote | $58.6M |
| Person · CEO, Space Exploration Technologies Corp. · behind SLF PAC and America PAC and 2 more | $40.2M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind SLF PAC and 75 PAC | $23.9M |
| Organization · behind Defend American Jobs | $19.4M |
| Organization · behind Winsenate and Duty and Country and 1 more | $15.3M |
| Organization · behind Defend American Jobs | $11.1M |
| Organization · behind Defend American Jobs | $10.1M |
| Organization · behind 75 PAC | $8.8M |
| Person · Physician, Adelson Drug Clinic · behind SLF PAC and NO Going Back PAC Inc. and 1 more | $7M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Cffe PAC and New American Jobs Fund and 3 more | $5.8M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind LCV Victory Fund and New American Jobs Fund | $5.2M |
| Person · Partner, AH Capital Management · behind Defend American Jobs and NO Going Back PAC Inc. | $5M |
Read for the 19 largest groups of 99, 94% of the $417.1M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $365,565 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $15,278,493
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 22, 2026.
All 1,746 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
33 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $141,871 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 17 payments · 67% of all spending | $10,421,466 |
| 25 payments · 8.5% of all spending | $1,335,701 |
| 19 payments · 4.1% of all spending | $644,964 |
| 45 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $237,697 |
| 4 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $231,000 |
| 6 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $221,645 |
| 10 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $203,023 |
| 156 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $198,666 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 54,293 contributions · 40% of ranked | $2,855,522 |
| 306 contributions · 6.5% of ranked | $459,119 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 300 contributions · 4% of ranked | $280,172 |
| 250 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $233,769 |
| 178 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $228,456 |
| 242 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $197,684 |
| 143 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $181,558 |
| 209 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $177,228 |
A further $137,834 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,915,599) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.