Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Real estate & home buildingDevelopers, brokers, landlords and home builders, with their PACs and trade groups.Business › Finance & real estate
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACTrade associationArlington, VirginiaActive
Connected organization: National Apartment Association
Political fund of National Apartment Association
The National Apartment Association (NAA) is a non-profit trade association in the United States of apartment communities, owners and vendors. These member companies are also part of NAA with their membership at the local level. Members represent the various facets of the multifamily housing industry: apartment owners, management executives, developers, builders, investors, property managers, leasing consultants, maintenance personnel, vendors and related business professionals throughout the United States and Canada. NAA has its headquarters in Arlington, VA. Robert Pinnegar currently serves as the organization's president and chief executive officer. NAA lobbies for policies that benefit owners and operators. NAA also publishes a trade magazine, UNITS. (Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00113241 · files monthly
“NAAPAC is a key advocacy tool for influencing federal policy decisions that directly affect the rental housing industry, including the businesses that supply goods and services to it.
NAAPAC is all about one thing: advocating for the apartment industry. We need to support lawmakers who strengthen our industry and implement policies that benefit rental community owners, property managers, and suppliers like you. From tax incentives to regulations on all sorts of products and materials, NAAPAC fights for a legislative environment where your services can thrive.”
National Apartment Association, the organization this committee is the political fund of, naahq.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 144 | $751,500 | $0 | $751,500 | 62% |
| Democratic | 100 | $434,000 | $0 | $434,000 | 36% |
| Other or unresolved | 10 | $29,000 | $0 | $29,000 | 2.4% |
| Shown support | 254 | $1,214,500 | $0 | $1,214,500 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 101 | $445K · 22% |
| Republican candidates | 143 | $744K · 38% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 11 | $36.5K · 1.8% |
| Other party committees | 4 | $120K · 6.1% |
| Other PACs and committees | 97 | $637K · 32% |
| All recipients | 356 | $2M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | 29 | $154K |
| California | 29 | $117.5K |
| New York | 18 | $89.5K |
| North Carolina | 12 | $57.5K |
| Missouri | 7 | $45.5K |
| Ohio | 11 | $42.5K |
| Pennsylvania | 9 | $40K |
| Illinois | 7 | $40K |
The largest 8 of 46 states.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,427 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.6M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $2,094,068
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
19% to named individuals, 1.3% to organizations, 80% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 80% | $1,679,019 |
| Organization · 1% | $21,680 |
48 smaller sources, $393.4K in all (19%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 915 contributions · 40% | $634,224 |
| 136 contributions · 6.4% | $101,783 |
| 164 contributions · 5.2% | $82,502 |
| 124 contributions · 4.5% |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $2,094,839
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
A conduit collects money that is legally someone else’s: the donor picks the recipient, and the conduit passes it on. The recipient is named in the filing’s memo line with its FEC committee id, so each row below is matched on that id rather than on the committee name the filer typed.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · 14 receipts · latest Mar 1, 2026 | $6K |
$6K across 14 receipts that named a destination, out of the 2,427 largest read. Receipts filed without a committee id in the memo are not counted here.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$2.1M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $184.9K, April 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 2 payments totaling $5K.
Besides giving through its PAC, National Apartment Association pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $866.2K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “NATIONAL APARTMENT ASSOCIATION”, found by searching “NATIONAL APARTMENT ASSOCIATION”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Nov 8, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
The National Apartment Association (NAA) is a non-profit trade association in the United States of apartment communities, owners and vendors. These member companies are also part of NAA with their membership at the local level. Members represent the various facets of the multifamily housing industry: apartment owners, management executives, developers, builders, investors, property managers, leasing consultants, maintenance personnel, vendors and related business professionals throughout the United States and Canada. NAA has its headquarters in Arlington, VA. Robert Pinnegar currently serves as the organization's president and chief executive officer. NAA lobbies for policies that benefit owners and operators. NAA also publishes a trade magazine, UNITS. Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
National Apartment Association PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $30K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLORADO SENATE VICTORY 2016 · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $30K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $11K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to CORNYN · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 4 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to EMMER VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to CLARK · 3 payments | $10K |
From the 365 largest of 366 recipient committees: $2M, or 95% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $5K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $70,606 |
| 93 contributions · 4.3% | $68,444 |
| 81 contributions · 4.3% | $67,222 |
| 67 contributions · 3.2% | $51,259 |
| 112 contributions · 3.1% | $48,581 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 11 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $30,000 |
| 8 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $24,000 |
| 62 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $21,549 |
| 52 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $20,227 |
| 7 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $20,210 |
| 4 contributions · 2% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 4 contributions · 2% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 18 contributions · 2% of ranked | $19,387 |
A further $38,161 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($239,347) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 141 contributions · 9% of ranked | $116,595 |
| 118 contributions · 8.7% of ranked | $113,410 |
| 82 contributions · 7.4% of ranked | $96,139 |
| 37 contributions · 3% of ranked | $39,527 |
| 31 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $32,867 |
| 26 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $27,179 |
| 45 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $21,696 |
| 37 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $19,725 |
A further $38,706 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($239,347) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $2,068,533
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 917 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 36 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $45,807 |
| 2 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 13 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $25,822 |
| 3 payments · 0.5% of all spending | $11,000 |
| 22 payments · 0.5% of all spending | $10,578 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.