Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › TX-33 race › 2025–2026
DemocraticU.S. House, TX-33Texas
Representative since 2025
No campaign site or public profiles are attached to this record yet.
Julie Johnson’s words are not shown
97% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 22 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Foreign Affairs
House Committee on Homeland Security
House Committee on House Administration
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Johnson’s 27 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
Campaign committee · 2025–2026 · latest available filing · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00843003
$1.10 has been spent for every dollar raised across 10 reports ($2.6M of $2.3M). Cash on hand went from $206.1K on Mar 31, 2025 to $8.1K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $101,500 | $126,327 | $206,076 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $429,595 | $127,129 | $508,542 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $428,946 | $130,591 | $806,897 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $305,720 | $164,112 | $948,505 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 11, 2026 | $288,299 | $687,437 | $549,366 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $520,989 | $583,102 | $487,254 |
| PRE-RUN-OFF 2026 through May 6, 2026 | $176,955 | $383,498 | $280,711 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $82,095 | $346,546 | $16,260 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $28 | $2,568 | $13,721 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $0 | $5,622 | $8,098 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No receipts reported
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
71% of the money placed by state came from inside Texas: $966.3K of $1.4M.
| Name |
|---|
Not read yet
Lost · 23,770 votes (33%) · 2 of 4 · Full results ↗
Lost · 9,663 votes (46%) · 2 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
| Amount |
|---|
| 1,622 contributions · 71% | $966,346 |
| 197 contributions · 6.1% | $82,640 |
| 103 contributions · 6% | $81,851 |
| 80 contributions · 1.9% | $26,096 |
| 38 contributions · 1.8% | $24,992 |
| 7 contributions · 1.5% | $20,250 |
| 17 contributions · 1.4% | $18,510 |
| 7 contributions · 1.2% | $15,750 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 43 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,333 contributions · 37% of ranked | $455,990 |
| Written instead of an employer · 269 contributions · 17% of ranked | $209,130 |
| 4 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $13,800 |
| 3 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 2 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $8,000 |
| 8 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $8,000 |
| 4 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $7,800 |
| 14 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $7,500 |
A further $51,175 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,261 contributions · 31% of ranked | $403,247 |
| 144 contributions · 11% of ranked | $148,463 |
| 72 contributions · 6.7% of ranked | $86,491 |
| 35 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $54,460 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 68 contributions · 4% of ranked | $51,668 |
| 52 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $40,580 |
| 20 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $34,725 |
| 26 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $23,250 |
A further $51,175 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
What the committees giving to Johnson’s campaign or spending on ads about Johnson are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 14% to named individuals, 27% to organizations, 8.5% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 4.1% to committees nothing more could be followed from, 44% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · behind Equality PAC and Don't Mess With TX PAC | $95.1K |
| Organization · behind Nuestro PAC | $51.5K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind New Leadership PAC | $48.1K |
| Organization · behind Rolling Sea Action Fund | $42.4K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Nuestro PAC | $27.9K |
| Organization · behind Nuestro PAC | $24.2K |
| Organization · behind Pro-Choice Majority Action | $18K |
| Organization · behind Nuestro PAC | $13.9K |
| Organization · behind Pro-Choice Majority Action | $13.5K |
| Person · Partner, Greylock Partners · behind New Leadership PAC | $12K |
| Organization · behind New Leadership PAC and Pro-Choice Majority Action | $9.5K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Nuestro PAC | $9.5K |
Read for all 8 groups that spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $2,439,560
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid.
All 825 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
32 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $55,748 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 35 payments | $534,443 |
| 17 payments | $372,482 |
| 5 payments | $300,390 |
| 7 payments | $300,000 |
| 19 payments | $128,537 |
| 18 payments | $118,285 |
| 18 payments | $83,699 |
| 2 payments | $59,500 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.