Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Civil rights & justice (voting rights, LGBTQ, criminal justice, tribal nations)Groups for voting rights, LGBTQ rights, criminal-justice change and the interests of tribal nations.Causes
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00550970 · files quarterly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“Equality PAC’s primary mission is simple: to elect more LGBTQ+ persons to Congress, individuals who will have a seat at the table, impact the debate, and humanize the LGBTQ community’s concerns. Beyond this goal, Equality PAC also supports strong LGBTQ community allies who will proudly and unapologetically stand with us in the fight to pass the Equality Act and equal protection under our nation’s laws. All of the funds that Equality PAC raises are directed to re-elect and expand our small – but mighty – LGBTQ caucus and to elect a pro-Equality Majority in the House of Representatives.”
Equality PAC, on its own site, lgbtequalitypac.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 103 | $405.8K · 42% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 1 | $250 · <0.1% |
| Democratic party committees | 1 | $110K · 11% |
| Other PACs and committees | 17 | $461.3K · 47% |
| All recipients | 122 | $977.3K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 14 | $74.5K |
| New York | 9 | $41K |
| Michigan | 6 | $27K |
| Illinois | 3 | $20K |
| Ohio | 4 | $18.5K |
| Arizona | 4 | $17.5K |
| Pennsylvania | 7 | $17.5K |
| Texas | 6 | $17.3K |
The largest 8 of 29 states.
Bars drawn to $150K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · 115 payments | $2.3M |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 26 payments | $593.9K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 29 payments | $189.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 24 payments | $141.4K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 19 payments | $114K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to EQUALITY CONGRESS PROJECT PAC · 3 payments | $102.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 13 payments | $97.5K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 19 payments | $94.8K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 10 payments | $90.4K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to TORRES · 5 payments | $25K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN NURSES ASSOCIATION · 4 payments | $20K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to LOFGREN · 5 payments | $15K |
$5.5M from 283 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $150K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 5 payments | $110K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $100K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $75K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 2 payments | $50K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS HELLCATS · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $10K |
$984.8K across 112 recipient committees, or 7.3% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 10 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 41,674 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $3.8M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 13 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $2.1M from 13 sources in all.
The 2 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $13,745,255
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
14% to named individuals, 10% to organizations, 71% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 45% | $6,229,671 |
| Organization · 9% | $1,235,000 |
| Organization · 0.6% | $87,051 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 13% | $1,723,501 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2.8% | $380,826 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.3% | $179,475 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.8% | $110,293 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $92,853 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $82,028 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $81,327 |
6688 smaller sources, $2.9M in all (21%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 533 contributions · 41% | $1,578,220 |
| 8,255 contributions · 13% | $485,602 |
| 3,425 contributions · 7.7% | $293,816 |
| 2,563 contributions · 3.7% | $142,707 |
| 1,577 contributions · 3.2% | $122,645 |
| 1,773 contributions · 2.5% | $95,515 |
| 1,619 contributions · 2.1% | $80,556 |
| 2,173 contributions · 2% | $74,554 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 2,114 contributions · 22% of ranked | $247,891 |
| Written instead of an employer · 5,920 contributions · 11% of ranked | $129,089 |
| 7 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $28,000 |
| 10 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 5 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 5 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $13,998 |
| 6 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $13,500 |
A further $2,534,391 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,016,068) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 33,510 contributions · 52% of ranked | $1,239,202 |
| 277 contributions · 4% of ranked | $96,144 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,362 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $70,437 |
| 170 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $59,059 |
| 48 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $54,099 |
| 43 contributions · 2% of ranked | $47,650 |
| 65 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $35,070 |
| 14 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $32,100 |
A further $1,344,385 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,016,068) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $13,407,602
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $13,134,733
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 3,203 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
146 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $2,141,175 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 250 payments · 29% of all spending | $3,948,078 |
| 77 payments · 23% of all spending | $3,104,723 |
| 120 payments · 12% of all spending | $1,650,066 |
| 2 payments · 7.9% of all spending | $1,065,000 |
| 13 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $354,801 |
| 17 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $289,270 |
| 357 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $245,683 |
| 23 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $214,272 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
$13.4M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $4.2M, Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 2 payments totaling $23.5K.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Late M2 report, 2019$8K assessed
Case 3722 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Nov 8, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Equality PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (qualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Equality PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.