Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › LA-01 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, LA-01
Representative since 2008
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
1 priority from stevescalise.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
A proven conservative, Steve believes in upholding the Constitution. He has always exercised fiscal discipline, pushed for lower taxes, and believed in balancing our nation’s checkbook. He is committed to fighting for secure borders and working to undo the Biden administration’s pro-amnesty policies that put the safety of our nation’s communities in jeopardy.
Steve also knows the importance of American energy dominance and development – both to our country and to the state of Louisiana. On day one of the 118th Congress, Steve committed to lowering energy costs with the Lower Energy Costs Act; streamlining energy production and the permitting process, and reducing American dependence on China. Steve will continue to fight for a national energy strategy that enhances energy production, increases innovation, and reduces our dependence on foreign nations.
Steve believes in protecting and promoting parents’ role in their child’s education, standing up for pro-life values, and protecting the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.
In 2012, Steve led the charge to pass the RESTORE Act, working across the aisle to secure wins critical to Louisiana. This piece of legislation dedicated fines from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill to coastal restoration and has been credited as the most important step toward restoring Louisiana’s coast. Over a decade later, Louisiana currently has the most active coastal restoration and resiliency projects underway in the history of our state.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · stevescalise.com/meet-steve
99% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 9 times in the 119th Congress.
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Scalise’s 14 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00394957
$1.11 has been spent for every dollar raised across 9 reports ($12.4M of $11.2M). Cash on hand went from $4.4M on Mar 31, 2025 to $2.9M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $2,435,279 | $2,180,836 | $4,385,596 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $2,263,799 | $871,772 | $5,777,622 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $1,305,256 | $2,077,558 | $5,005,320 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $1,838,946 | $1,315,980 | $5,528,286 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $1,477,249 | $1,328,888 | $5,676,647 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $1,269,944 | $2,935,133 | $4,011,458 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 18, 2026 | $47,557 | $173,073 | $3,885,942 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $362,642 | $1,277,489 | $2,971,095 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $171,406 | $229,975 | $2,912,526 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 5 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 52 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $9.1M.
No endorsements page
Won · 159,896 votes (61%) · 1 of 4 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 28,507 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.3M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 552 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.9M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $11,172,078
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
5.2% of the money placed by state came from inside Louisiana: $70.3K of $1.4M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3,125 contributions · 21% | $284,587 |
| 3,638 contributions · 15% | $198,848 |
| 813 contributions · 13% | $170,950 |
| 2,941 contributions · 7.1% | $96,361 |
| 860 contributions · 5.2% | $70,347 |
| 425 contributions · 2.5% | $34,634 |
| 898 contributions · 2.5% | $33,751 |
| 1,033 contributions · 2.3% | $31,202 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 52 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 23,024 contributions · 52% of ranked | $669,823 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,351 contributions · 11% of ranked | $138,968 |
| 3 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $16,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $14,500 |
| 2 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $21,062 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($478,389) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Scalise’s campaign or spending on ads about Scalise are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
No outside spending filed
The campaign also refunded $16,432 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $12,343,736
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 2,552 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
55 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $1,687,197 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 6 payments · 30% of all spending | $3,771,000 |
| 18 payments · 15% of all spending | $1,850,031 |
| 35 payments · 14% of all spending | $1,690,874 |
| 31 payments · 9.1% of all spending | $1,127,463 |
| 7 payments · 7% of all spending | $862,965 |
| 19 payments · 5.9% of all spending | $736,025 |
| 3 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $314,478 |
| 13 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $182,022 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 23,024 contributions · 51% of ranked | $669,823 |
| 277 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $56,090 |
| 162 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $49,321 |
| 68 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $32,001 |
| 133 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $30,650 |
| 9 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $24,500 |
| 57 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $18,297 |
| 174 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $17,677 |
A further $21,062 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($478,389) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.