Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Politicians' PACsPACs a politician sponsors or runs: a leadership PAC (the FEC’s designation D), a committee the FEC lists as sponsored by a candidate, or a super PAC the politician’s own team runs and press reports tie to them. One that exists only for that politician’s own race is under Groups spending on one race.Parties & politicians
PAC (qualified)Leadership PACGlen Cove, New YorkActive
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00669929 · files monthly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 29 | $120K · 78% |
| Other PACs and committees | 6 | $34.7K · 22% |
| All recipients | 35 | $154.7K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| New York | 4 | $17K |
| Michigan | 3 | $12K |
| Nevada | 1 | $10K |
| Washington | 1 | $10K |
| Illinois | 2 | $10K |
| California | 2 | $10K |
| Missouri | 2 | $10K |
| Florida | 2 | $7K |
The largest 8 of 19 states.
Bars drawn to $25K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS · 4 payments | $15K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION · 4 payments |
Tap a row with to see who gave.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 14 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $62.6K. These gifts, as the FEC's contributor file lists them, come to more than the $62.6K the committee's own summary reports for this line; the two filings disagree. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $348,600
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
33% to named individuals, 9.2% to organizations, 55% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Orinda, CA · 4.2% | $15,000 |
| Organization · 2.8% | $10,000 |
| Organization · 1.4% | $5,000 |
| Person · Doctor, Self Employed · Old Westbury, NY · 1.4% | $5,000 |
| Person · Executive, Amatomartin LLC · Melville, NY · 1.4% | $5,000 |
| Organization · 1.4% | $5,000 |
| Person · New York, NY · 1.4% | $5,000 |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 6 contributions · 48% | $30,000 |
| 4 contributions · 32% | $20,000 |
| 1 contribution · 8% | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 7.3% | $4,600 |
| 1 contribution · 4% | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.8% | $500 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $224,474
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$224.5K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $51.3K, March 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Late M12 report, 2021$2.3K assessed
Case 4264 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Nov 8, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
Besides giving through its PAC, Americans for the Common Good pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $78.1K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “AMERICANS FOR THE COMMON GOOD”, found by searching “COMMON GOOD”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Nov 7, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Common Good PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a leadership PAC. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
| $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BRANCH 193 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS · 3 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION · 3 payments | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATION · 2 payments | $7.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS · 2 payments | $7.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN MARITIME OFFICERS · 2 payments | $7K |
$300.7K from 56 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · Connected to SUSIE LEE VICTORY FUND 2024 · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to DEMOCRATIC FUTURE LEADERSHIP FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to IMPOSSIBLE TO INEVITABLE · 3 payments | $7K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to DEMOCRACY DEFENDERS · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BLUE DOG VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to TEAM RAJA VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to DAN GOLDMAN NEW YORK VICTORY · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
$120K across 28 recipient committees, or 53% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| Person · Atlantic Beach`, NY · 1.4% | $5,000 |
| Person · Executive, Sutherland Capital MGMT. Inc. · Atlantic Beach, NY · 1.4% | $5,000 |
| Person · Attorney, Microsoft Corp. · Bellevue, WA · 1.4% | $5,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · NY · 1.4% | $5,000 |
| Person · Pacific Palisades, CA · 1.4% | $5,000 |
| Person · Mass General Hospital, Physician · Boston, MA · 1.3% | $4,600 |
| Organization · 0.7% | $2,500 |
| Organization · 0.7% | $2,500 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3.8% | $13,405 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2.8% | $9,855 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2.8% | $9,760 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2.4% | $8,495 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2.3% | $8,285 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.9% | $6,797 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.9% | $6,761 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.7% | $6,039 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.7% | $5,878 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.4% | $4,995 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.4% | $4,947 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.4% | $4,901 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.4% | $4,868 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.4% | $4,785 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.3% | $4,747 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.3% | $4,673 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.3% | $4,588 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.3% | $4,469 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.2% | $4,287 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.2% | $4,248 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.1% | $4,056 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.1% | $4,045 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.1% | $3,957 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1.1% | $3,735 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1% | $3,590 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1% | $3,579 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1% | $3,563 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.9% | $3,018 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.8% | $2,828 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $2,476 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $2,455 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $2,418 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $2,354 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $2,167 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $2,147 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $2,014 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $1,968 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $1,948 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.5% | $1,871 |
3079 smaller sources, $79.7K in all (23%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 contributions · 25% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 12% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 12% of ranked | $5,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 12% of ranked | $5,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 12% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 12% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 11% of ranked | $4,600 |
| 1 contribution · 1.2% of ranked | $500 |
A further $27,500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 contributions · 25% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 25% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 12% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 12% of ranked | $5,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 12% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 11% of ranked | $4,600 |
| 1 contribution · 1.2% of ranked | $500 |
A further $27,500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Total itemized disbursements $199,388
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 67 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
1 payment was reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $4,750 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 11% of all spending | $25,000 |
| 1 payment · 5.2% of all spending | $11,595 |
| 2 payments · 4.5% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 4.5% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 3 payments · 3.1% of all spending | $7,000 |
| 1 payment · 2.2% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · 2.2% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · 2.2% of all spending | $5,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.