Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › NV-03 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, NV-03
Representative since 2019
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
Susie Lee’s words are not shown
91% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 59 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Appropriations
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Lee’s 70 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00655613
92¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($5.5M of $5.9M). Cash on hand went from $745.5K on Mar 31, 2025 to $931.3K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $421,588 | $142,790 | $745,453 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $623,067 | $145,251 | $1,223,269 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $612,209 | $129,766 | $1,705,712 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $806,602 | $160,701 | $2,351,613 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $1,034,597 | $317,235 | $3,068,976 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 20, 2026 | $364,335 | $123,133 | $3,310,178 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $539,022 | $159,972 | $3,689,228 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $1,224,820 | $3,608,731 | $1,305,318 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $316,190 | $690,214 | $931,294 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
5 endorsers listed on Susie Lee’s own campaign site.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
National Organization for Women (NOW) PAC
“EMILYs List is proud to endorse Rep. Susie Lee for reelection. During her time in Congress, she has delivered for southern Nevada, defended our fundamental rights, and stood up against Trump’s dangerous agenda. While House Republicans are working in lockstep to pass reckless policies that drive costs up and cut critical services for working people, we need leaders like Rep. Lee to fight back,” said Jessica Mackler, EMILYs List President. “Rep. Lee has proven she has what it takes to win tough elections, and we are ready to stand with her to take back power in 2026.”
“We need policymakers, like Congresswoman Susie Lee, who recognize that our free enterprise system works and enhances the livelihoods of the American people,” said Neil Bradley, Executive Vice President & Chief Policy Officer at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. “Congresswoman Lee has been a strong partner in tackling issues that matter to Southern Nevadans, from workforce, to housing, to retail crime, and more, and that’s why we’re excited to announce the U.S. Chamber’s endorsement of Congresswoman Susie Lee for Nevada’s 3rd congressional district.”
Advanced · 28,798 votes (70%) · 1 of 4 · Full results ↗
Won · 161,418 votes (60%) · 1 of 3 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 3,736 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $3.4M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 812 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.6M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 6 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 27 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $618.4K.
Total reported receipts $5,942,432
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
27% of the money placed by state came from inside Nevada: $927.9K of $3.4M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,381 contributions · 27% | $927,933 |
| 805 contributions · 25% | $857,761 |
| 280 contributions · 10% | $344,010 |
| 166 contributions · 5.8% | $197,466 |
| 141 contributions · 3.3% | $113,431 |
| 163 contributions · 3.2% | $109,794 |
| 68 contributions · 2.6% | $88,023 |
| 93 contributions · 2.5% | $85,735 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 47 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,699 contributions · 46% of ranked | $1,193,393 |
| Written instead of an employer · 283 contributions · 10% of ranked | $274,308 |
| Written instead of an employer · 57 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $80,062 |
| 8 contributions · 1% of ranked | $25,500 |
| 5 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $17,500 |
| 8 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $17,000 |
| 5 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $14,500 |
| 6 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $14,500 |
A further $139,868 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($300,554) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Lee’s campaign or spending on ads about Lee are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 46% to named individuals, 28% to organizations, 20% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 5.6% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · CEO, Uline · behind American Majority Action PAC | $799.3K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind AB PAC | $209.4K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind AB PAC | $156.9K |
| Person · Investment Counselor, Cohen Klingenstein LLC · behind Civic Renewal Fund Inc. | $146.4K |
| Organization · behind Civic Renewal Fund Inc. | $146.4K |
| Organization · behind AB PAC | $140K |
| Organization · behind Somos PAC | $115.1K |
| Organization · behind AB PAC | $84K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Somos PAC | $62.2K |
| Person · Retired · behind AB PAC and Planned Parenthood Votes | $56.1K |
| Organization · behind Somos PAC | $54.1K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind AB PAC | $38.4K |
Read for the 16 largest groups of 21, 92% of the $3.1M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $21,316 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $5,445,683
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 2,061 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
66 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $301,799 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 23 payments · 61% of all spending | $3,342,875 |
| 117 payments · 6.8% of all spending | $370,303 |
| 4 payments · 5.8% of all spending | $319,250 |
| 214 payments · 4.1% of all spending | $225,832 |
| 102 payments · 3% of all spending | $162,704 |
| 8 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $128,362 |
| 23 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $90,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $88,096 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,118 contributions · 28% of ranked | $875,129 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 642 contributions · 13% of ranked | $409,685 |
| 315 contributions · 8.2% of ranked | $257,891 |
| 107 contributions · 5.4% of ranked | $169,991 |
| 46 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $87,655 |
| 81 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $81,619 |
| 40 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $71,046 |
| 23 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $56,300 |
A further $130,368 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($300,554) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.