Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › WA-03 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, WA-03
Representative since 2023
18 priorities from marieforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Marie is fighting to ensure every woman can see a doctor whenever she wants, for whatever reason. Because that is her right, and once freedom is limited, it’s lost. She is protecting access to critical medical care and the freedom of women to choose what is right for their families and themselves. Marie will do whatever it takes to prevent a national abortion ban, which would override the will of the people of Washington State.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · marieforcongress.com/issues
Marie will always fight to make sure state and local law enforcement agencies have the resources they need to keep Fentanyl and illegal guns off of our streets. Marie believes we need to provide more federal funding to boost officer and firefighter pay to improve retention rather than furnish departments with unnecessary line items like night-vision goggles.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · marieforcongress.com/issues
Marie and her husband have run an auto repair shop, so she knows firsthand how important it is to be able to repair your own equipment. She is working to stop manufacturers of farm and consumer equipment from gouging their customers by forcing them to pay the original manufacturer for repairs.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · marieforcongress.com/issues
Marie and her husband built their home by hand to save money and brought their child to work because daycare was too expensive. In Congress, she is working to bring down the cost of housing, increase choices for childcare options, and cut out the middlemen who jack up the cost of healthcare.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · marieforcongress.com/issues
Marie is in Congress to fight for working people — not special interests. Her campaign doesn’t take money from special interests (like drug companies). She also believes that we need to ban our Representatives from other behaviors that erode public trust, like trading individual stocks.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · marieforcongress.com/issues
Marie has been working in Congress to combat unfair business practices — like opposing mergers of major grocery chains and opposing deceptive “Shrinkflation” food packaging. She believes a well trained workforce and higher wages for workers will increase the labor force and stabilize consumer prices across the economy. She believes abundant and cheap energy from traditional and renewable sources will provide further pricing relief to consumers.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · marieforcongress.com/issues
Marie believes that climate change is real and is man-made. She also believes that increasingly severe weather events caused by climate change disproportionately affect the working class. Marie has also championed tax-rebates for energy efficiency upgrades for working class families, like weather skirting for mobile homes.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · marieforcongress.com/issues
Marie is committed to making childcare more accessible and increasing flexibility for working families — particularly in rural communities. She supports re-introducing and expanding the Child Tax Credit, which makes it easier for parents to make the choices that best work for their families, whether that’s paying a family member or going to a traditional daycare.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · marieforcongress.com/issues
Marie believes in fighting the drug crisis through increased border security, stricter punishments for sale and possession, expanded access to treatment and rehab, and better job opportunities. She believes it needs to be easier to find help getting sober than it is to find a dealer.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · marieforcongress.com/issues
Marie knows Washington has some of the best workers in the world. She is supporting efforts to create American jobs and making sure American workers have the training needed to do those jobs at good pay. She is fighting unfair trade and work practices by competitors like China to create a level playing field for American workers.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · marieforcongress.com/issues
As someone who ran an auto repair shop, Marie knows the hoops small business owners jump through to start, run, and grow their business. When her shop applied for a loan from the Small Business Administration (SBA), the application was the size of a phone book and took almost a year to complete. That’s why in Congress she’s fighting to streamline the application process for SBA loans and empower young people in the trades to start their own small businesses.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · marieforcongress.com/issues
Marie knows many good jobs don’t require a 4-year degree. In Congress, she is working to increase access to apprenticeships and technical training and reduce the number of jobs that require applicants to have expensive college degrees. She is also working to allow Pell Grants to apply to job training, not just college degrees.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · marieforcongress.com/issues
79% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 143 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Appropriations
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Perez’s 54 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00806174
98¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($9.3M of $9.5M). Cash on hand went from $436K on Mar 31, 2025 to $234.5K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $608,195 | $198,659 | $435,997 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $904,844 | $224,301 | $1,116,540 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $893,783 | $157,307 | $1,853,016 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $833,651 | $262,654 | $2,424,013 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $1,308,288 | $276,476 | $3,455,825 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $1,634,509 | $1,185,071 | $3,905,263 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $109,413 | $1,949,857 | $2,064,820 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $2,545,458 | $3,971,890 | $638,388 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $634,126 | $1,037,994 | $234,520 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
31 endorsers listed on Marie Gluesenkamp Perez’s own campaign site: 1 party, 18 unions, 12 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 78,019 votes (36%) · 2 of 9 · Full results ↗
Won · 188,073 votes (54%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · DHM Research, Sep 27, 2026 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 10 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 40 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $3.9M.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 8,984 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $3.5M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 533 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.1M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $9,472,267
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
34% of the money placed by state came from inside Washington: $1.2M of $3.5M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5,487 contributions · 34% | $1,208,540 |
| 783 contributions · 16% | $577,952 |
| 393 contributions · 12% | $418,247 |
| 386 contributions · 6.6% | $234,038 |
| 442 contributions · 4.5% | $159,469 |
| 135 contributions · 2.7% | $96,761 |
| 157 contributions · 2.5% | $89,405 |
| 103 contributions · 2% | $71,685 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 55 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 5,955 contributions · 61% of ranked | $1,847,657 |
| Written instead of an employer · 616 contributions · 10% of ranked | $304,826 |
| 4 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 4 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 4 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $13,800 |
| 3 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 36 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $10,101 |
| 3 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $9,800 |
A further $56,377 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($988,249) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Perez’s campaign or spending on ads about Perez are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 43% to named individuals, 25% to organizations, 23% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 9.3% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind HMP | $2.5M |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind CLF | $1.7M |
| Person · CEO, Space Exploration Technologies Corp. · behind CLF and America PAC and 2 more | $1.5M |
| Person · Director of Community Development, LAS Vegas Sands Corp. · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and CLF and 1 more | $679.1K |
| Organization · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and Maga Inc. | $577.9K |
| Person · Investments, Self-Employed · behind CLF | $559.3K |
| Person · Founder, Bloomberg Inc. · behind HMP and AB PAC | $509.5K |
| Person · Chairman, Hendricks Holding Co Inc. · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and Maga Inc. | $495.3K |
| Organization · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and Maga Inc. | $403.3K |
| Organization · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and Maga Inc. | $351.5K |
| Person · Managing Director, Susquehanna International GRP · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and CLF and 1 more | $317.4K |
| Person · Partner, Greylock Partners · behind HMP | $223.2K |
Read for the 17 largest groups of 18, 99.9% of the $23M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $70,671 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $9,194,352
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 2,283 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
138 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $684,663 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 19 payments · 69% of all spending | $6,369,497 |
| 118 payments · 11% of all spending | $987,140 |
| 12 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $263,645 |
| 2 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $230,000 |
| 7 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $226,726 |
| 44 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $120,225 |
| 7 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $111,045 |
| 191 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $104,947 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 5,003 contributions · 39% of ranked | $1,343,822 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 946 contributions · 15% of ranked | $501,304 |
| 303 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $164,188 |
| 142 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $83,200 |
| 49 contributions · 2% of ranked | $68,753 |
| 97 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $55,040 |
| 37 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $48,653 |
| 24 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $48,443 |
A further $56,377 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($988,249) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.