Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
Republican leaders' super PACsSuper PACs run by or for Republican congressional leaders and their allies, such as Senate Leadership Fund and the Congressional Leadership Fund, and the pop-up PACs those fund and create. A caucus’s PAC, or a group that only shares donors with leadership, is not one. Placed from our list of party-leadership networks, which a reviewer confirms.Parties & politicians
Hybrid PAC (nonqualified)Beverly, MassachusettsActive
Make America Great Again Inc. (abbreviated as MAGA Inc.) is an American super PAC that supports Donald Trump. It was founded on September 23, 2022. As a super PAC, it can raise unlimited money for campaigns and spend it freely to support Trump, but it is barred from coordinating directly with presidential campaigns. In February 2026 the Brennan Center for Justice reported that MAGA Inc. Pac relied almost entirely on megadonors, with 96% of its funds coming from donors who made donations of $1 million or more and 62% from donors who gave $5 million or more. (Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00892471 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“MAGA, Inc. makes independent expenditures in U.S. federal elections in support of candidates who share the values of the founders and funders of MAGA, Inc.”
Maga Inc., on its own site, magapac.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $10.6M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 3 payments | $2.1M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $59.9K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $11.7K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $5K |
$12.7M from 5 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $201M from 102 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $449,433,545
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
52% to named individuals, 42% to organizations, 5.8% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · 7.8% | $35,000,000 |
| Person · Chairman, Hendricks Holding Co Inc. · Afton, WI · 6.7% | $30,000,000 |
| Person · Director of Community Development, LAS Vegas Sands Corp. · Las Vegas, FL · also behind 9 other groups · 5.6% | $25,000,000 |
| Organization · 5.4% | $24,428,579 |
| Organization · 4.7% | $21,290,242 |
| Person · Managing Director, Susquehanna International GRP · Bala Cynwyd, PA · also behind 16 other groups · 3.6% | $16,000,000 |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 45 contributions · 22% | $95,712,985 |
| 37 contributions · 17% | $73,376,913 |
| 22 contributions · 16% | $69,384,000 |
| 29 contributions · 15% | $63,783,663 |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $308,941,678
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$308.9M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $201M, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Make America Great Again Inc. (abbreviated as MAGA Inc.) is an American super PAC that supports Donald Trump. It was founded on September 23, 2022. As a super PAC, it can raise unlimited money for campaigns and spend it freely to support Trump, but it is barred from coordinating directly with presidential campaigns. In February 2026 the Brennan Center for Justice reported that MAGA Inc. Pac relied almost entirely on megadonors, with 96% of its funds coming from donors who made donations of $1 million or more and 62% from donors who gave $5 million or more. Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Maga Inc. is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| 3.4% |
| $15,347,524 |
| Person · Executive, IJS Investments LLC · North Bay Village, FL · also behind 5 other groups · 2.9% | $13,000,000 |
| Organization · 2.8% | $12,500,000 |
| Person · Retired · San Francisco, CA · also behind 2 other groups · 2.8% | $12,500,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · President and Co-Founder, Openai · San Francisco, CA · also behind 2 other groups · 2.8% | $12,500,000 |
| Person · Executive Chairman, Energy Transfer · Dallas, TX · also behind 1 other group · 2.8% | $12,500,000 |
| Person · Founder, Winklevoss Capital · New York, NY · also behind 1 other group · 2.3% | $10,542,392 |
| Person · Founder, Winklevoss Capital · New York, NY · also behind 1 other group · 2.3% | $10,500,242 |
| Organization · 2% | $8,856,689 |
| Organization · 1.8% | $8,000,000 |
| Person · Entrepreneur, Valmore GP · Palm Beach, FL · also behind 6 other groups · 1.8% | $8,000,000 |
| Organization · 1.3% | $6,000,000 |
| Person · General Partner, Andreesen Horowitz · Menlo Park, CA · also behind 2 other groups · 1.3% | $6,000,000 |
| Organization · 1.2% | $5,413,000 |
| Person · Retired · Atherton, CA · also behind 1 other group · 1.1% | $5,100,000 |
| Organization · 1.1% | $5,000,000 |
| Organization · 1.1% | $5,000,000 |
| Organization · 1.1% | $5,000,000 |
| Organization · 1.1% | $5,000,000 |
| Person · Healthcare Investor, Self-Employed · Woodmere, NY · 1.1% | $5,000,000 |
| Person · Self-Employed · New York City, NY · also behind 1 other group · 1.1% | $5,000,000 |
| Person · CEO, Space Exploration Technologies Corp. · Austin, TX · also behind 14 other groups · 1.1% | $5,000,000 |
| Person · Chairman and CEO, Blackstone · New York, NY · also behind 10 other groups · 1.1% | $5,000,000 |
| Person · Chairman and CEO, Blackstone · New York, NY · also behind 10 other groups · 1.1% | $5,000,000 |
| Person · CEO, Intercontinental Exchange · Atlanta, GA · 1.1% | $5,000,000 |
| Person · Angel Investor, Self-Employed · Bloomfield Hills, MI · 0.9% | $4,000,000 |
| Organization · 0.7% | $3,000,000 |
| Person · General Partner, Andreesen Horowitz · Menlo Park, CA · 0.7% | $3,000,000 |
| Person · Co Founder and Partner, A16Z · Los Altos, CA · also behind 4 other groups · 0.7% | $3,000,000 |
| Person · Manager, QOL Medical LLC · Vero Beach, FL · 0.7% | $3,000,000 |
| Person · Administrator, Nasa · Nazareth, PA · also behind 4 other groups · 0.7% | $3,000,000 |
| Person · Advisor, JPM · Greenwood Village, CO · 0.7% | $3,000,000 |
| Person · Founder, Stake · New Canaan, CT · 0.7% | $3,000,000 |
| Person · CEO, Miles PER Hour Inc · Boca Raton, FL · also behind 1 other group · 0.7% | $2,999,985 |
| Organization · 0.7% | $2,980,624 |
| Person · Extremity Care LLC, Co-Owner · Conshohocken, PA · 0.6% | $2,500,000 |
| Person · Extremity Care LLC, Co-Owner · Conshohocken, PA · 0.6% | $2,500,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2.4% | $10,562,090 |
98 smaller sources, $54.3M in all (12%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| $30,100,425 |
| 8 contributions · 6.1% | $26,000,000 |
| 7 contributions · 2.6% | $11,100,000 |
| 5 contributions · 1.9% | $8,030,000 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 contributions · 11% of ranked | $30,000,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 17 contributions · 10% of ranked | $26,685,529 |
| 1 contribution · 9.3% of ranked | $25,000,000 |
| 12 contributions · 7.9% of ranked | $21,042,634 |
| Written instead of an employer · 10 contributions · 7.8% of ranked | $20,970,518 |
| 2 contributions · 6% of ranked | $16,000,000 |
| 4 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $13,000,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.7% of ranked | $12,500,000 |
A further $160,593,034 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 contributions · 12% of ranked | $31,500,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 17 contributions · 10% of ranked | $26,685,529 |
| 16 contributions · 9.3% of ranked | $25,042,634 |
| 1 contribution · 9.3% of ranked | $25,000,000 |
| 16 contributions · 8.2% of ranked | $21,849,985 |
| 8 contributions · 6.1% of ranked | $16,250,000 |
| 2 contributions · 6% of ranked | $16,000,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.7% of ranked | $12,500,000 |
A further $160,593,034 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Total itemized disbursements $308,940,889
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 567 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
2 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $21,583 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 6 payments · 65% of all spending | $200,000,000 |
| 15 payments · 10% of all spending | $31,211,668 |
| 1 payment · 8.1% of all spending | $25,000,000 |
| 67 payments · 6.5% of all spending | $20,000,000 |
| 6 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $10,542,394 |
| 6 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $10,500,244 |
| 2 payments · 1% of all spending | $2,999,985 |
| 17 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $1,128,328 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 459 payments totaling $272.6M.