Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › Illinois U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
DemocraticU.S. SenateIllinois
Representative since 2017
No campaign site or public profiles are attached to this record yet.
Raja Krishnamoorthi’s words are not shown
97% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 18 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Krishnamoorthi’s 101 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, May 1, 2025 to Sep 30, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00904466
100¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 7 reports ($31.5M of $31.6M). Cash on hand went from $11.8M on Jun 30, 2025 to $32.9K on Sep 30, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $12,666,604 | $907,898 | $11,758,706 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $12,211,917 | $5,882,372 | $18,088,251 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $3,602,227 | $6,444,146 | $15,246,332 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 25, 2026 | $2,000,543 | $10,671,059 | $6,575,816 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $909,568 | $4,332,461 | $3,152,923 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $167,744 | $3,246,079 | $74,588 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $2,340 | $44,030 | $32,898 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 3 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 17 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $19.4M.
Not read yet
Lost · 399,051 votes (33%) · 2 of 10 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Primary March 17, 2026 · 5 polls
Raja Krishnamoorthi leads Juliana Stratton by 11.4 points · average gap, 2 latest nonpartisan polls · 3 far-off polls left out
Each dot is a poll. The line is the median of the 5 latest nonpartisan polls. How polls are read
Juliana Stratton won by 7.1 points. The 2 final polls had a median of Juliana Stratton +3.7, understating Juliana Stratton's margin by 3.4 points.
| Poll | Juliana Stratton | Raja Krishnamoorthi | Lead | vs. result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victory Researchended Mar 15 | 36.6% | 34.2% | Juliana Stratton +2.4 | −4.7 |
| FM3 Researchended Mar 12 | 38% | 33% | Juliana Stratton +5 | −2.1 |
| Median of the final polls | Juliana Stratton +3.7 | −3.4 | ||
| Result | 40.2% | 33.1% | Juliana Stratton +7.1 |
March 17, 2026 · Result (unofficial, 95% reporting) · Each pollster's last poll ending in the 21 days before the vote, read for the two leading finishers; the median leaves out polls a side paid for
Poll data from The New York Times, licensed CC BY 4.0 · Updated November 10, 2026 · 17 polls paid for by a party or campaign are left out
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 9,015 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $10.3M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 141 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $399.3K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $31,560,943
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
42% of the money placed by state came from inside Illinois: $5.7M of $13.5M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4,271 contributions · 42% | $5,708,204 |
| 1,358 contributions · 18% | $2,418,974 |
| 449 contributions · 6.4% | $866,391 |
| 495 contributions · 5.9% | $805,246 |
| 416 contributions · 5.8% | $779,478 |
| 361 contributions · 3.2% | $438,393 |
| 404 contributions · 2% | $273,749 |
| 165 contributions · 1.9% | $252,435 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 51 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 3,578 contributions · 34% of ranked | $2,251,412 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,371 contributions · 32% of ranked | $2,096,703 |
| Written instead of an employer · 220 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $305,736 |
| 87 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $190,395 |
| 20 contributions · 1% of ranked | $63,400 |
| 40 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $36,700 |
| 13 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $36,000 |
| 13 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $35,000 |
A further $3,347,414 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($645,554) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Krishnamoorthi’s campaign or spending on ads about Krishnamoorthi are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 59% to named individuals, 37% to organizations, 0.8% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 0.9% to committees nothing more could be followed from, 1.6% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Governor of Illinois, State of Illinois · behind Illinois Future PAC | $9.6M |
| Organization · behind Fairshake and Protect Progress | $3.5M |
| Organization · behind Fairshake | $2M |
| Organization · behind Fairshake | $1.8M |
| Person · Philanthropist, Self Employed · behind Illinois Future PAC | $1M |
| Person · Partner, AH Capital Management · behind Fairshake | $860.8K |
| Person · Partner, AH Capital Management · behind Fairshake | $860.8K |
| Organization · behind Fairshake | $825.5K |
| Organization · behind Protect Progress | $424.5K |
| Person · Co-Founder and Managing Director, Westbridge Capital · behind The Impact Fund | $289.9K |
| Person · Business Owner, Chicago Cubs · behind Illinois Future PAC | $239.6K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Progressive Values Illinois and The Impact Fund | $143.4K |
Read for all 9 groups that spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $3,435,176 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $27,754,138
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 2,976 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
176 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $1,334,758 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 53 payments · 67% of all spending | $21,081,643 |
| 111 payments · 5.1% of all spending | $1,593,282 |
| 23 payments · 3.6% of all spending | $1,139,580 |
| 18 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $592,201 |
| 10 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $563,779 |
| 17 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $340,350 |
| 43 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $227,930 |
| 325 payments · 0.5% of all spending | $171,533 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Not counted in the lead. This poll has Stratton +2.4, 13.8 points from the median of the race's latest nonpartisan polls (Krishnamoorthi +11.4); a poll more than 8 points from it is left out.
Not counted in the lead. This poll has Stratton +5, 16.4 points from the median of the race's latest nonpartisan polls (Krishnamoorthi +11.4); a poll more than 8 points from it is left out.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 3,356 contributions · 20% of ranked | $1,935,676 |
| 659 contributions · 11% of ranked | $1,068,189 |
| 702 contributions · 10% of ranked | $978,079 |
| 395 contributions · 7.6% of ranked | $732,951 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 456 contributions · 5.9% of ranked | $567,383 |
| 192 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $398,298 |
| 121 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $241,504 |
| 174 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $206,645 |
A further $3,334,914 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($645,554) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.