Groups spending on one raceGroups set up for one candidate or one race: no parent organization, and 80% or more of their spending on that race, for a candidate, against their rival, or both. A group that is part of an older organization (a trade, union or caucus PAC, or a party leaders’ super PAC shell) stays in its own place even when it spends on one race, and one that has spread across races is filed by its side.Political groups
Hybrid PAC (nonqualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
$2M raised, $1.9M spent, $345.2K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
75% filed as other receipts · 13% from donors giving over $200 · largest donor Sumir Chadha, $500K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$1M spent for candidates and $392.6K against them, most on IL-SEN ($1.2M) · $63K given to candidates and committees, the largest to Amish Shah ($10K) · 99.5% of its support to Democrats. See where it goes
Where it spendsWhich races and candidates is its money for or against?
“The Impact Fund invests in critical races up and down the ballot where grassroots energy can defeat Trump’s MAGA allies, protect our freedoms, and build lasting Democratic power.”
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Its site sums up what it stands for in the statement above, and publishes no list of positions beyond it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$1.1M to 13 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $1,096,878
Democratic 99.5%
Against candidates $392,580
Democratic 100%
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$63,000 in 22 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
11
$53K · 84%
Other or unresolved candidates
1
$5K · 7.9%
Other PACs and committees
1
$5K · 7.9%
All recipients
13
$63K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
Arizona
1
$10K
Illinois
3
$9.5K
Virginia
1
$7.5K
New Jersey
2
$7.5K
California
1
$5K
Washington
1
$5K
Florida
1
$5K
Michigan
1
$5K
The largest 8 of 9 states.
Recipients 13
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $2,000,562 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$1,509,40975%
Where it came from
Sumir Chadha2 contributions, latest Nov 7, 2025 · CO-FOUNDER AND MANAGING DIRECTOR · WESTBRIDGE CAPITAL · BURLINGAME, CA$500,000
Glen Tullman4 contributions, latest Feb 13, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · CHICAGO, IL$200,000
My Tree Holdings, LLC1 receipt, latest Mar 11, 2026 · Miami, Florida$50,000
Chintu PatelOne contribution on Jan 12, 2026 · CO-CEO · AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS · GLEN HEAD, NY$50,000
Gurpreet Singh2 contributions, latest Jan 28, 2026 · ENTERPRENEUR · SELF EMPLOYED · HUNTS POINT, WA$50,000
Rj Narang5 contributions, latest Oct 14, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · MC LEAN, VA$45,000
Nimish Sanghrajka4 contributions, latest Oct 13, 2026 · REAL ESTATE · CAPITAL SOLUTIONS · LOWER GWYNEDD, PA$40,000
Ravi Akhoury6 contributions, latest Aug 1, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · LONGBOAT KEY, FL$36,250
Indian American Impact1 receipt, latest Jan 31, 2026 · Washington, District of Columbia$8,500
DLZ Corp.1 receipt, latest Mar 11, 2026 · Columbus, Ohio$5,000
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $216.9K from 7 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$252,88813%
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$228,71311%
Refunds and rebatesMoney coming back to the committee: rebates and refunds of what it spent, contributions it made that were returned, and loans it made that were repaid.$4,0000.2%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$3,0000.1%
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
TransfersMoney moved in from affiliated committees.$2,5520.1%
Total reported receipts $2,000,562
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $2M followed back through up to 3 committees
74% to named individuals, 8.4% to organizations, 1% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 16% not itemized.
Gave directly$1.8M 91%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Sumir ChadhaPerson · Co-Founder and Managing Director, Westbridge Capital · Burlingame, CA · 25%
$500,000
Not itemized by this committee15%
$304,283
Glen TullmanPerson · Chicago, IL · also behind 2 other groups · 10%
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$1,703<0.1%
Total reported disbursements $1,873,769
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $1,866,723 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$1.3M of it was independent spending for Robin Kelly and against Juliana Stratton and 3 more$1,275,00068%
Filed as
Advertising
Spending over time
$1.9M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $808.6K, February 2026.
$1.9M12
Jan 2025Oct 2026
1Mar 17, 2026 primary, IL-SEN$1.2M of its independent spending was aimed at it
2Jul 21, 2026 primary, AZ-01$221.5K of its independent spending was aimed at it
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$63,081
September 2026$49,552
August 2026$60,251
July 2026$148,633
June 2026$106,736
May 2026$30,567
April 2026$12,920
March 2026$428,960
February 2026$808,635
January 2026$43,466
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$90,897
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$30,071
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “IMPACT FUND” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
TSTina ShahDemocratic · U.S. House · NJ-07 · via Tina Shah For Congress3 payments, latest Jul 24, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Jul 24, 2026$5K
PDPia DandiyaDemocratic · U.S. House · FL-22 · via Pia Dandiya For Congress2 payments, latest Aug 18, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Aug 18, 2026$5K
Suhas Subramanyam3 receipts, latest Sep 28, 2026Suhas for Virginia · H4VA10279$7.5K
Shri Thanedar1 receipt, latest Mar 30, 2026Shri for Congress · H2MI13204$5K
Pia Dandiya2 receipts, latest Aug 18, 2026PIA Dandiya for Congress · H6FL21059$5K
S. Raja Krishnamoorthi1 receipt, latest Mar 27, 2025Friends of Raja for Congress · H6IL08147$5K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
$63K across 13 recipient committees, or 3.4% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Gurpreet SinghPerson · Enterpreneur, Self Employed · Hunts Point, WA · 2.5%
$50,000
Show 7 more sources
Gave directly, more
Name
Amount
Rj NarangPerson · Mc Lean, VA · 2.2%
$45,000
Nimish SanghrajkaPerson · Real Estate, Capital Solutions · Lower Gwynedd, PA · 2%
$40,000
Ravi AkhouryPerson · Longboat Key, FL · 1.8%
$36,250
Marilyn GeninattiPerson · Paradise Valley, AZ · 1.5%
$30,000
Ramesh V. KapurPerson · Winchester, MA · 1.2%
$25,000
Manoj P. SinghPerson · Palm Beach Gardens, FL · 0.8%
$15,600
Pradeep SinghPerson · Chairman, Aditi Consulting · Yarrow Point, WA · 0.7%
$15,000
Through Progressive Values IllinoisDemocratic & progressive groups (proposed)$11.5K 0.6%
Through Progressive Values Illinois
Name
Amount
States United ActionOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 0.6%
$11,521
268 smaller sources, $177.9K in all (8.9%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
District of Columbia15 contributions · 6.7%
$114,456
Florida100 contributions · 6.3%
$107,194
New York76 contributions · 4.9%
$84,101
Washington98 contributions · 4%
$68,830
Arizona30 contributions · 3.3%
$56,719
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Westbridge Capital2 contributions · 32% of ranked
$500,000
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 1,374 contributions · 29% of ranked
$452,413
Halo Pharmaceuticals3 contributions · 9.7% of ranked
$150,000
Eileses Capital2 contributions · 6.5% of ranked
$100,000
Tarsadia Foundation1 contribution · 6.5% of ranked
$100,000
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 33 contributions · 4.4% of ranked
$67,334
Amneal Pharmaceuticals1 contribution · 3.2% of ranked
$50,000
Capital Solutions4 contributions · 2.6% of ranked
$40,000
A further $164,750 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($228,713) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Co-founder And Managing Director2 contributions · 32% of ranked
$500,000
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 1,228 contributions · 28% of ranked
$433,116
Senior Scientist3 contributions · 9.7% of ranked
$150,000
Co-founder2 contributions · 6.5% of ranked
$100,000
Philanthropist1 contribution · 6.5% of ranked
$100,000
Co-ceo1 contribution · 3.2% of ranked
$50,000
Enterpreneur2 contributions · 3.2% of ranked
$50,000
Real Estate4 contributions · 2.6% of ranked
$40,000
A further $164,750 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($228,713) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Polling and researchSurveys, opposition research, voter file work, and analytics.$104,1415.6%
Filed as
NONCONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - RESEARCH CONSULTING$36,192
NONCONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - RESEARCH$30,000
POLLING$21,691
RESEARCH CONSULTING$16,258
Paid to
Hart Research$30,000
Z to a Research LLC$29,508
Impact Research, Inc.$21,691
Workbench Strategy$14,442
Targetsmart$8,500
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$96.5K of it was independent spending against Marlene Galan-Woods$96,4595.2%
Filed as
Direct Mail ServicesIndependent spending in opposition to Marlene Galan-Woods$96,459
Paid to
Deliver Strategies LLCIndependent spending in opposition to Marlene Galan-Woods$96,459
Field and canvassingDoor-to-door canvassing, phone banks and calls to voters, petition and signature gathering, and get-out-the-vote work.$60K of it was independent spending for S. Krishnamoorthi and against Juliana Stratton and 1 more$60,0003.2%
TKO Buying LLCIndependent spending: $35K in support of S. Krishnamoorthi · $12.5K in opposition to Juliana Stratton and 1 more$60,000
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$31,0211.7%
Filed as
LIST ACQUISITION$25,616
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING$5,405
Paid to
VAN Ness Creative Strateiges, LLC$31,021
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$20,0711.1%
Filed as
MERCHANT FEES$17,241
NONCONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - MERCHANT FEES$1,778
BANK FEES$1,053
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$19,019
Amalgamated Bank$1,053
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$18,9851%
Filed as
SOFTWARE$8,517
SUBSCRIPTIONS$8,473
NONCONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - SOFTWARE$1,000
NONCONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - TEXT MESSAGING SERVICES$995
Paid to
NGP VAN$8,517
Mailchimp$8,210
Intuit$1,000
Getthru$995
Squarespace$263
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$8,5000.5%
Filed as
OVERHEAD ALLOCATION$8,500
Paid to
Indian American Impact$8,500
Office and administrativeRent, utilities, phones, supplies, equipment, security, food, and campaign merchandise.$1,835<0.1%
Filed as
MEALS$1,835
Paid to
Desi Galli$1,835
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$1,747<0.1%
Not broken out by the committeeReported as a lump sum, with memo entries pointed to for the detail. Where those entries were filed and read, this page counts the payees they name instead; what is left here was never itemised.$458<0.1%
Filed as
REIMBURSEMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$245
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - REIMBURSEMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$213
Paid to
Patel, Chintan$458
Total itemized disbursements $1,866,723
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 234 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
4 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $2,124 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
TKO Buying LLC11 payments · 62% of all spending
$1,160,000
VAN Ness Creative Strateiges, LLC21 payments · 7.4% of all spending
$138,159
Pinpoint Digital LLC1 payment · 6.7% of all spending
$125,000
Deliver Strategies LLC1 payment · 5.1% of all spending
$96,459
LC Media LLC1 payment · 2.7% of all spending
$50,000
Hart Research1 payment · 1.6% of all spending
$30,000
Z to a Research LLC3 payments · 1.6% of all spending
$29,508
Venable LLP11 payments · 1.4% of all spending
$27,067
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Hart Research1 payment, latest Jan 23, 2026NONCONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - RESEARCH$30K
