Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › House campaign committee › 2025–2026
House campaign committeePrincipal campaign committeePhoenix, ArizonaActive
Connected organization: Amish Shah Victory Fund
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00836502 · files quarterly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $370.7K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 4 payments | $77K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $64.4K |
| Senate campaign committee · 1 payment | $33K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to 314 ACTION FUND · 4 payments | $24.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN ACADEMY OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE AAEM PAC · 2 payments | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION · 2 payments | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to 314 ACTION VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY · 3 payments | $10K |
$1.1M from 180 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $33.3K |
$33.3K across 1 recipient committee, or 0.6% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 5,945 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $3.6M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 8 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Each loan as the committee’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $5,654,454
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
13% to named individuals, 83% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 75% | $4,237,004 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3.5% | $198,114 |
4519 smaller sources, $1M in all (18%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,855 contributions · 33% | $1,169,243 |
| 894 contributions · 21% | $755,562 |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $5,540,210
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
A conduit collects money that is legally someone else’s: the donor picks the recipient, and the conduit passes it on. The recipient is named in the filing’s memo line with its FEC committee id, so each row below is matched on that id rather than on the committee name the filer typed.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · 73 receipts · latest Sep 30, 2026 | $55.7K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 3 receipts · latest Sep 16, 2026 | $4K |
$59.7K across 76 receipts that named a destination, out of the 5,945 largest read. Receipts filed without a committee id in the memo are not counted here.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$5.5M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $3.1M, Jul 2 – Sep 30, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Amish for Arizona is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a House campaign committee. It is a principal campaign committee. Its FEC record names Amish Shah Victory Fund as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
| $372,336 |
| 325 contributions · 7% | $250,655 |
| 125 contributions · 3% | $106,116 |
| 106 contributions · 2.5% | $90,655 |
| 149 contributions · 2.4% | $87,541 |
| 105 contributions · 2.1% | $74,086 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 2,681 contributions · 39% of ranked | $1,056,444 |
| Written instead of an employer · 451 contributions · 12% of ranked | $326,232 |
| Written instead of an employer · 332 contributions · 9.2% of ranked | $252,823 |
| 334 contributions · 7.6% of ranked | $208,256 |
| 9 contributions · 1% of ranked | $28,513 |
| 14 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $17,500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked | $14,000 |
A further $182,163 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($813,300) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 2,641 contributions · 31% of ranked | $1,041,119 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 450 contributions · 9.8% of ranked | $326,284 |
| 467 contributions · 9.3% of ranked | $311,854 |
| 337 contributions · 6.2% of ranked | $208,856 |
| 149 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $103,245 |
| 125 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $71,098 |
| 57 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $61,960 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 72 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $53,550 |
A further $67,583 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($813,300) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $4,986,160
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,014 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
78 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $262,562 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10 payments · 50% of all spending | $2,793,846 |
| 6 payments · 7.4% of all spending | $411,926 |
| 154 payments · 5.9% of all spending | $326,855 |
| 32 payments · 4.6% of all spending | $253,000 |
| 3 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $146,815 |
| 18 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $137,193 |
| 130 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $121,922 |
| 15 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $114,634 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.