Electing women's & communities' candidatesGroups whose purpose is electing, or mobilizing voters for, candidates from a shared community: women, or Black, Latino, Asian American and Pacific Islander candidates, among others. The community has to be an identity people share, not an age bracket or a political stance.Causes
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
$26M raised, $24.4M spent, $2.4M cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
67% filed as other receipts · 21% from donors giving $200 or less · largest donor Michael Bloomberg, $8.9M. See who funds it
Where it goes
$9.9M spent for candidates and $7.5M against them, most on PA-03 ($3.5M) · $245K given to candidates and committees, the largest to Janelle S. Bynum ($10K) · 100% of its support to Democrats. See where it goes
Where it spendsWhich races and candidates is its money for or against?
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
Why this committee exists In its own words
“We are the only organization in the nation focused on recruiting, training, and electing Democrats with a background in science to public office.
There isn't an issue that doesn't benefit from having scientists at the decision-making table — from climate change to reproductive healthcare, scientists are data-driven who will champion fact-based policies.”
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Its site sums up what it stands for in the statement above, and publishes no list of positions beyond it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$10.1M to 43 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $10,132,762
Democratic 100%
Against candidates $7,510,334
Republican 65%Other or unresolved 35%
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$245,000 in 81 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving. These are its own contributions. It also passed on $19,800 of people’s earmarked gifts, listed by recipient under Spending.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
43
$220.5K · 90%
Other or unresolved candidates
1
$5K · 2%
Other PACs and committees
5
$19.5K · 8%
All recipients
49
$245K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
California
8
$38.5K
Illinois
6
$24K
Colorado
3
$20K
Minnesota
3
$18K
New Jersey
4
$17K
Oregon
2
$12K
Pennsylvania
3
$11K
Arizona
1
$10K
The largest 8 of 20 states.
Recipients 49
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $26,045,436 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$17,439,08267%
Where it came from
Michael Bloomberg5 contributions, latest Oct 9, 2026 · EXECUTIVE · BLOOMBERG LP · NEW YORK, NY$8,900,000
314 Action17 receipts, latest Oct 8, 2026 · Washington, District of Columbia$5,412,856
Kimbark Foundation1 receipt, latest Mar 9, 2026 · Washington, District of Columbia$500,000
Peterson Solutions Fund1 receipt, latest Apr 2, 2026 · New York, New York$285,000
Linus UpsonOne contribution on Jun 25, 2026 · MANAGEMENT OVERHEAD · GOOGLE · WOODSIDE, CA$250,000
Drew Weissman2 contributions, latest Mar 5, 2026 · PHYSICIAN · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PHILADELPHIA, PA$245,000
Ronald Abramson44 contributions, latest Oct 7, 2026 · ATTORNEY · BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY · WASHINGTON, DC$168,000
Clay Kirk4 contributions, latest Jun 18, 2026 · AADD INC. · SELF EMPLOYED · NEW YORK, NY$157,000
Donald Henley87 contributions, latest Oct 13, 2026 · MUSICIAN · SELF EMPLOYED · CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA$119,784
C. David Swindell7 contributions, latest Sep 16, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · BOSTON, MA$85,000
Tim Hesterberg4 contributions, latest Mar 31, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · SEATTLE, WA$75,000
Democratic Doctors PAC1 receipt, latest Oct 9, 2026 · Washington, District of Columbia$72,750
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $6.6M from 15 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$5,443,90021%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$2,784,85211%
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$198,7540.8%
TransfersMoney moved in from affiliated committees.$158,9520.6%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$14,896<0.1%
ActBlue1 receipt, latest Dec 9, 2025 · Hybrid pac (nonqualified)$4,896
The 4 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports. Here they come to $28.3K, more than the $14.9K this committee's own reports show on the line.
Refunds and rebatesMoney coming back to the committee: rebates and refunds of what it spent, contributions it made that were returned, and loans it made that were repaid.$5,000<0.1%
Total reported receipts $26,045,436
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $26M followed back through up to 3 committees
42% to named individuals, 23% to organizations, 1.1% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 33% not itemized.
Gave directly$24.3M 93%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Michael BloombergPerson · Executive, Bloomberg LP · New York, NY · also behind 17 other groups · 34%
$8,900,000
Not itemized by this committee32%
$8,378,876
314 ActionOrganization · 21%
$5,412,856
Kimbark FoundationOrganization · 1.9%
$500,000
Peterson Solutions FundOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 1.1%
$285,000
Linus UpsonPerson · Management Overhead, Google · Woodside, CA · 1%
$250,000
Drew WeissmanPerson · Physician, University of Pennsylvania · Philadelphia, PA · 0.9%
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $19,983,556 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $383.4K
$383.4K+
$1.5M+
$3.5M+
$6.1M+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
New York1,801 contributions · 48%
$9,584,684
District of Columbia372 contributions · 31%
$6,211,973
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $24,359,051 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Independent expendituresSpending to support or oppose a candidate, made without coordinating with them.$14,228,45258%
Spent for or against
Ala StanfordSupport · 35 records · latest May 19, 2026$3,513,033
314 Action Victory Fund8 payments · latest Sep 30, 2026 · TRANSFER TO AFFILIATED COMMITTEE$104,000
314 Action Impact Slate5 payments · latest Aug 4, 2026 · TRANSFER TO AFFILIATED COMMITTEE$26,750
Its own contributions to candidates and committeesMoney given to federal candidates, party committees and other PACs.$245,0001%
Paid to
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$80,7050.3%
Earmarked gifts it passed onPeople’s own contributions that the committee collected and sent to the candidates and committees they named. Filed on the same line as its own contributions.$19,800<0.1%
Sent to
Not yet matched to a recipientmostly gifts of $200 or less, which the recipients’ filings don’t list one by one, and reports not yet read$19,300
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $24,253,239 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition. The $19,800 in earmarked gifts it passed on is not in this list: it is people’s money, listed by recipient under “Earmarked gifts it passed on” above.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Spending over time
$24.4M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $4.3M, May 2026.
$24.4M123
Jan 2025Nov 2026
1May 19, 2026 primary, PA-03$3.5M of its independent spending was aimed at it
2Aug 11, 2026 primary, MN-02$2.5M of its independent spending was aimed at it
3Nov 3, 2026 general election, CA-06$1.7M of its independent spending was aimed at it
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending. The line stops at the latest report, through Oct 14, 2026, at the dashed rule; elections after it are marked where they fall.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$1,786,435
September 2026$4,079,859
August 2026$1,589,526
July 2026$1,712,640
June 2026$1,033,678
May 2026$4,342,056
April 2026$1,407,159
March 2026$2,784,160
February 2026$672,617
January 2026$735,328
December 2025$332,695
November 2025$355,592
October 2025$292,783
September 2025$494,955
August 2025$239,603
July 2025$320,440
June 2025$432,475
May 2025$359,127
April 2025$517,693
March 2025$324,830
February 2025$289,832
January 2025$255,567
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “314 ACTION FUND” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
314 Action Fund is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names 314 Action Victory Fund as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
MRManny RutinelDemocratic · U.S. House · CO-08 · via Manny Rutinel For Congress2 payments, latest Sep 29, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Sep 29, 2026$10K
ASAmish ShahDemocratic · U.S. House · AZ-01 · via Amish For Arizona2 payments, latest Sep 30, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Sep 30, 2026$10K
JJJacob JohnsonDemocratic · U.S. House · MN-01 · via Jake Johnson For Congress2 payments, latest Sep 30, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Sep 30, 2026$10K
JAJamie AgerDemocratic · U.S. House · NC-11 · via Ager For Congress4 payments, latest Oct 14, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Oct 14, 2026$10K
RPRichard PanDemocratic · U.S. House · CA-06 · via Richard Pan For Congress2 payments, latest Sep 30, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Sep 30, 2026$10K
Jacob Johnson2 receipts, latest Sep 30, 2026Jake Johnson for Congress · H6MN01190$10K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Committees funding this one
Name
Amount
314 Action Impact SlateHybrid PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to 314 ACTION FUND · 14 payments
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
$245,000
Ronald AbramsonPerson · Attorney, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney · Washington, DC · 0.6%
$168,000
Clay KirkPerson · Aadd Inc., Self Employed · New York, NY · also behind 1 other group · 0.6%
$157,000
Through 314 Action Impact Slate$137K 0.5%
Through 314 Action Impact Slate
Name
Amount
Not itemized by 314 Action Impact Slate0.5%
$136,993
400 smaller sources, $1.5M in all (5.8%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
California5,129 contributions · 4.4%
$886,641
Massachusetts1,260 contributions · 2.5%
$509,330
Pennsylvania1,066 contributions · 2%
$409,589
Illinois1,148 contributions · 1.5%
$309,079
Washington1,465 contributions · 1.3%
$265,157
Virginia832 contributions · 1%
$208,837
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Bloomberg LP7 contributions · 66% of ranked
$8,900,350
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 21,613 contributions · 18% of ranked
$2,408,978
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 2,030 contributions · 4% of ranked
$532,427
Google27 contributions · 2.3% of ranked
$304,700
University Of Pennsylvania8 contributions · 1.8% of ranked
$246,925
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney44 contributions · 1.3% of ranked
$168,000
Bioventures Investors2 contributions · 0.5% of ranked
$70,000
Benenson Capital2 contributions · 0.2% of ranked
$31,415
A further $6,328,248 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($5,443,900) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Executive44 contributions · 66% of ranked
$8,916,308
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 19,879 contributions · 15% of ranked
$1,994,276
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 1,764 contributions · 3% of ranked
$401,631
Physician694 contributions · 2.7% of ranked
$371,635
Management Overhead1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked
$250,000
Attorney349 contributions · 1.6% of ranked
$223,358
Aadd INC4 contributions · 1.2% of ranked
$157,000
Professor312 contributions · 0.6% of ranked
$76,737
A further $6,325,280 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($5,443,900) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Heal America PAC1 payment · latest Mar 26, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION$5,000
Liftoff PAC2 payments · latest Nov 13, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION$5,000
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$12M of it was independent spending for Ala Stanford and for Matthew David Klein and 10 more
$13,104,03654%
Filed as
ADVERTISINGIndependent spending: $2.8M in support of Ala Stanford · $1M in support of Richard Pan and 4 more$6,998,102
Advertising & Media ProductionIndependent spending: $2.5M in support of Matthew David Klein · $1.3M in opposition to Kevin Kiley and 3 more$5,956,095
Media ProductionIndependent spending: $76.1K in support of Ala Stanford · $26.1K in support of Manny Rutinel and 2 more$122,236
In-Kind: Media ProductionIndependent spending in support of Manny Rutinel$21,602
MEDIA CONSULTING$6,000
Paid to
Technicolor CampaignsIndependent spending: $1.7M in opposition to Kevin Kiley · $893.6K in support of Jasmeet Bains and 2 more$3,108,303
GPS ImpactIndependent spending: $1M in support of Richard Pan · $13.1K in support of Manny Rutinel and 1 more$1,022,978
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$2.2M of it was independent spending for Ala Stanford and against Jennifer Kiggans and 4 more$2,951,99612%
Filed as
DIRECT MAIL SERVICESIndependent spending: $655.9K in support of Ala Stanford · $373.9K in opposition to Jennifer Kiggans and 4 more$2,770,078
POSTAGE$180,410
PRINTING$1,508
Paid to
Dover Strategy GroupIndependent spending in support of Ala Stanford$655,876
GDA Wins, LLCIndependent spending in opposition to Jennifer Kiggans$373,865
RWT Production$353,043
Windward Strategies$350,038
Mission Control, Inc.Independent spending in opposition to Thomas H. Kean Jr.$341,213
The Strategy GroupIndependent spending in support of Daniel Biss$309,810
Payroll and staffSalaries, wages, benefits, and payroll services.$2,050,5158.5%
Filed as
STAFF SALARY ALLOCATION$1,764,232
HEALTH INSURANCE ALLOCATION$170,003
RETIREMENT BENEFITS ALLOCATION$116,281
Paid to
314 Action$2,050,515
TransfersMoney moved to an affiliated or authorised committee.$930,7503.8%
Filed as
TRANSFER TO AFFILIATED COMMITTEE$930,750
Paid to
DR. Jasmine Clark Science Victory Fund$300,000
DR. Amish Shah Science Victory Fund$300,000
DR. Richard PAN Stop RFK JR. Committee$200,000
314 Action Victory Fund$104,000
314 Action Impact Slate$26,750
Refunds and redesignationsContributions returned to donors or reassigned to another election.$916,0003.8%
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$16.5K of it was independent spending for Ala Stanford$893,7053.7%
Filed as
TEXT MESSAGING SERVICESIndependent spending: $16.5K in support of Ala Stanford$498,360
SOFTWARE$318,826
DATABASE SERVICES$38,130
WEBSITE SERVICES$26,213
SUBSCRIPTION$9,944
SUBSCRIPTIONS$2,232
Paid to
Tatango$308,137
NGP VAN, Inc.$298,294
Message Digital LLC$170,000
Middle Seat Consulting$38,130
Landslide Digital$17,610
Brushfire LLCIndependent spending in support of Ala Stanford$16,472
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$776,9163.2%
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$750,5503.1%
Filed as
DIGITAL LIST ACQUISITION$492,650
LIST ACQUISITION$257,500
EVENT TICKETS$400
Paid to
Message Digital LLC$400,000
Leverage$196,150
Hockeystick$105,000
Paction Data, Inc$30,000
Blue Action Inc.$6,500
True Blue Analytics$5,000
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$737,4903%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$245,000
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - POLLING$215,345
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - RESEARCH CONSULTING$124,332
DONATION$55,400
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - MEDIA CONSULTING$25,500
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - PRINTING$18,628
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - MEDIA PRODUCTION$17,000
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - TEXT MESSAGING SERVICES$13,553
DONATION TO NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$10,000
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - RESEARCH SERVICES$5,000
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - LEGAL CONSULTING$3,515
CONTRIBUTION TO NONFEDERAL COMMITTEE$2,075
Paid to
Schoen Research$123,500
Hart Research Associates$93,500
Gateway Strategy Group$58,000
314 Action Victory Fund - Maine$47,000
Upswing$41,816
Public Policy Polling$22,000
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$470,1771.9%
Filed as
MERCHANT FEES$187,165
PAYROLL TAXES ALLOCATION$145,664
MERCHANT FEE$115,751
BANK FEES$7,262
TAXES$5,263
INCOME TAX$3,876
BANK FEE$3,528
PAYROLL TAXES$886
NONCONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - MERCHANT FEE$309
LEGAL FEES$228
NONCONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - BANK FEES$216
NONCONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - BANK FEE$28
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$298,727
314 Action$145,664
Amalgamated Bank$9,472
Internal Revenue Service$9,139
First Data Merchant Services$2,678
Meow$1,563
Polling and researchSurveys, opposition research, voter file work, and analytics.$316,4881.3%
Filed as
POLLING$249,413
RESEARCH$41,925
ANALYTICS CONSULTING$22,500
RESEARCH CONSULTING$2,650
Paid to
ALG Polling$65,530
GQR$44,000
Keating Research, Inc.$38,333
Z to a Research LLC$37,125
Public Policy Polling$30,000
Pantheon Analytics$25,150
Office and administrativeRent, utilities, phones, supplies, equipment, security, food, and campaign merchandise.$603 of it was independent spending for Ala Stanford$228,1950.9%
Filed as
RENT ALLOCATION$188,860
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT ALLOCATION$23,550
SUPPORTER GIFTS$5,734
INSURANCE ALLOCATION$3,751
INSURANCE$3,610
MEAL$1,446
Photography ServicesIndependent spending in support of Ala Stanford$603
MEALS$386
TECH EQUIPMENT ALLOCATION$256
Paid to
314 Action$216,417
States Made LLC$5,611
Clarke and Sampson$3,610
Boardwalk Wharf Restaurant$801
Jim Mcwilliams PhotographyIndependent spending in support of Ala Stanford$603
Uber$333
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$76,3690.3%
Filed as
DIGITAL SERVICES ALLOCATION$72,000
IT SERVICES ALLOCATION$4,150
MERCHANDISE$1,491
TAXI SERVICE$484
TAXI FARE$319
VOID OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED DISBURSEMENT-$2,075
Paid to
314 Action$76,150
Bumperactive$1,491
Uber$634
Lyft$169
Shah for Maine-$2,075
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$29,3140.1%
Filed as
TRAVEL$15,517
AIRFARE$5,625
LODGING$4,782
AIR TRAVEL$1,451
TRAIN TRAVEL$706
LODGING & AIR TRAVEL$654
AUTO TRAVEL$370
PARKING$210
Paid to
Chase Travel$6,512
American Airlines$5,120
United Airlines$2,811
Amtrak$1,817
Hilton$1,706
Avis Budget Car Rental$1,568
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$15,946<0.1%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEES$15,946
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$15,946
Not broken out by the committeeReported as a lump sum, with memo entries pointed to for the detail. Where those entries were filed and read, this page counts the payees they name instead; what is left here was never itemised.$4,793<0.1%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - SEE BELOW$2,418
CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$1,676
REIMBURSEMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$699
Paid to
Ramp$4,094
Sarkozi, Jacob$601
Proctor, Kenneth Drew$98
Total itemized disbursements $24,253,239
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 2,011 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
21 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $360,944 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
314 Action224 payments · 15% of all spending
$3,571,603
Technicolor Campaigns16 payments · 13% of all spending
$3,125,303
SP Media5 payments · 10% of all spending
$2,460,000
LC Media LLC5 payments · 7.8% of all spending
$1,904,816
Waterfront Strategies2 payments · 6.4% of all spending
$1,559,520
Middle Seat Consulting54 payments · 5.5% of all spending
$1,331,059
GPS Impact5 payments · 4.2% of all spending
$1,022,978
Dover Strategy Group17 payments · 3.5% of all spending
$856,453
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
