Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Republican & conservative groupsOn the Republican side by their own words, their main funder, or a published source a reviewer cites. A group with one cause is filed under that cause instead.Political groups
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
PAC aligned with Ted Cruz (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00448696 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“SCF is a national grassroots organization that seeks to bring bold conservative leadership to Washington by supporting candidates who will fight for the timeless conservative principles of limited government, strong national defense, and traditional family values.
SCF helps candidates by bundling contributions for them from thousands of freedom-loving Americans across the country, and our super PAC, Senate Conservatives Action (SCA), helps them by running hard-hitting ads to promote their conservative campaigns.”
Senate Conservatives Fund, on its own site, senateconservatives.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 24 | $101,024 | $1,970,833 | $2,071,857 | 76% |
| Other or unresolved | 15 | $14,336 | $647,778 | $662,114 | 24% |
| Shown support | 39 | $115,360 | $2,618,611 | $2,733,971 | 100% |
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving. These are its own contributions. It also passed on $3,111,320 of people’s earmarked gifts, listed by recipient under Spending.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Republican candidates | 14 | $101K · 88% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 3 | $14.3K · 12% |
| All recipients | 17 | $115.4K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | 5 | $30K |
| Georgia | 1 | $15K |
| Alabama | 2 | $14.9K |
| Florida | 1 | $10K |
| Oklahoma | 1 | $10K |
| Ohio | 2 | $10K |
| Missouri | 1 | $5.5K |
| Kansas | 1 | $5K |
The largest 8 of 11 states.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 29,114 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $4.7M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $7,287,749
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
17% to named individuals, 0.7% to organizations, 82% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 82% | $5,990,347 |
| Person · Retired · Lake Delton, WI · 0.9% | $67,500 |
| Person · Retired · Houston, TX · 0.9% | $67,205 |
| Organization · 0.7% | $48,187 |
| Person · Retired · Houston, TX · also behind 3 other groups · 0.6% | $43,500 |
| Person · West Palm Beach, FL · 0.6% | $42,000 |
| Person · Author, Outdoor Writer, Self · Naples, FL · 0.5% | $38,300 |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4,220 contributions · 17% | $815,036 |
| 2,546 contributions · 17% |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $8,306,641
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition. The $3,111,320 in earmarked gifts it passed on is not in this list: it is people’s money, listed by recipient under “Earmarked gifts it passed on” above.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$8.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $789.2K, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 5 payments totaling $5.4K.
No lobbying disclosures matched
PAC aligned with Ted Cruz Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Senate Conservatives Fund is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $15K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BLESSEY MARINE SERVICE INC · 2 payments | $6K |
$6K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to TRANSPORTATION TRUST FUND · 3 payments | $15K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ONE TEAM SENATE MAJORITY · 3 payments | $11K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to 2026 GOP SENATE VICTORY · 2 payments | $10K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to TEAM PAXTON · 2 payments | $10K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to HOUSE CONSERVATIVE VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to 2024 REPUBLICAN SENATE VICTORY · 2 payments | $5.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to TEAM MORENO · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BUCKEYE VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ONE TEAM SENATE MAJORITY · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to GROW THE MAJORITY · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to PROTECT THE HOUSE 2024 · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to WINNING EDGE FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
$115.4K across 17 recipient committees, or 1.4% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| Person · Exec, Wmig · Irvine, CA · 0.5% | $38,000 |
| Person · Retired · Lewisville, TX · 0.5% | $36,500 |
145 smaller sources, $916.2K in all (13%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| $806,904 |
| 3,017 contributions · 9.1% | $436,963 |
| 786 contributions · 2.9% | $139,544 |
| 966 contributions · 2.8% | $134,621 |
| 452 contributions · 2.8% | $134,346 |
| 518 contributions · 2.8% | $132,383 |
| 922 contributions · 2.6% | $123,298 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 19,253 contributions · 75% of ranked | $2,841,241 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,589 contributions · 7.5% of ranked | $286,955 |
| Written instead of an employer · 267 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $61,193 |
| 65 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $32,500 |
| 6 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $31,000 |
| 12 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $30,000 |
| 9 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $27,450 |
| 27 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $27,420 |
A further $887,049 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,536,946) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 19,920 contributions · 75% of ranked | $3,038,237 |
| 116 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $72,100 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 254 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $67,263 |
| 224 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $64,775 |
| 83 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $49,116 |
| 74 contributions · 1% of ranked | $40,030 |
| 71 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $34,599 |
| 36 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $34,130 |
A further $670,041 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,536,946) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $5,188,673
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 3,469 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
92 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $114,776 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 205 payments · 17% of all spending | $1,427,602 |
| 115 payments · 10% of all spending | $863,506 |
| 35 payments · 7.6% of all spending | $635,083 |
| 22 payments · 4.4% of all spending | $366,093 |
| 22 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $359,094 |
| 22 payments · 4.2% of all spending | $348,910 |
| 278 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $195,000 |
| 91 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $112,969 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.