Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › Florida U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, Florida
Senator since 2025
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
Ashley Moody’s words are not shown
98% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 16 times in the 119th Congress.
Senate Committee on Armed Services
Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Senate Committee on the Judiciary
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Moody’s 61 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 13, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00895763
94¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($13.7M of $14.5M). Cash on hand went from $409.9K on Mar 31, 2025 to $815.9K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $417,680 | $7,801 | $409,879 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $1,974,787 | $122,165 | $2,262,502 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $1,647,480 | $269,743 | $3,640,239 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $1,755,752 | $299,172 | $5,096,819 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $2,611,364 | $578,792 | $7,129,392 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $2,395,166 | $1,103,322 | $8,421,236 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 29, 2026 | $456,844 | $395,260 | $8,482,821 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $2,066,939 | $7,730,153 | $2,819,607 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $1,185,847 | $3,189,571 | $815,882 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
123 endorsers listed on Ashley Moody’s own campaign site: 1 party, 101 officials, 21 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
President
Governor · Governor of the Free State of Florida
Sen.
“— Rick Scott (@ScottforFlorida) March 28, 2025”
Sen. · U.S. Senator from Texas
Sen. · U.S. Senator from Alabama
Rep. · Congressman for Florida’s 19th District and Republican Nominee for Governor of Florida
Rep. · Congressman for Florida’s 1st District
Rep. · Congressman for Florida’s 2nd District
Florida State Fraternal Order of Police
“Senator Ashley Moody said, “The Sunshine State’s law enforcement officers are the best in the business of keeping Florida families protected, and I am honored to have the endorsement of the Florida State Fraternal Order of Police as I work to continue to serve in the U.S. Senate. As your Senator, just as when I was your Attorney General, I am committed to policies that promote law and order, and ensure our brave men and women in uniform are supported. Other states want to defund police, but in Florida we defend them, and that is a fight I will never back down from.”
Advanced · 1,320,048 votes (80%) · 1 of 4 · Full results ↗
Won · 4,211,455 votes (51%) · 1 of 3 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Ashley Moody leads Angie Nixon by 6.5 pointsAverage of the 5 latest nonpartisan polls
Latest poll · Research Co., Nov 2, 2026
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 12 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 78 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $5.2M.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 25,887 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $5M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 941 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.6M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $14,524,032
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
44% of the money placed by state came from inside Florida: $2.2M of $5M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 7,953 contributions · 44% | $2,202,592 |
| 973 contributions · 6.6% | $330,801 |
| 2,427 contributions · 5.6% | $281,824 |
| 464 contributions · 5% | $250,250 |
| 2,863 contributions · 4.7% | $235,824 |
| 138 contributions · 2.5% | $128,178 |
| 304 contributions · 2.5% | $127,921 |
| 953 contributions · 2.5% | $124,842 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 54 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 18,876 contributions · 50% of ranked | $1,648,258 |
| Written instead of an employer · 749 contributions · 8.3% of ranked | $272,711 |
| Written instead of an employer · 78 contributions · 2% of ranked | $66,140 |
| 14 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $46,200 |
| Written instead of an employer · 23 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $38,800 |
| 17 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $24,848 |
| 4 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 12 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $18,500 |
A further $540,331 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,074,904) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Moody’s campaign or spending on ads about Moody are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 51% to named individuals, 37% to organizations, 5.6% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 6.7% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Attorney, Pajcic & Pajcic · behind New Deal for All, Inc. | $7.8M |
| Organization · behind Stronger Safer Nation | $6M |
| Person · Chief Executive Officer, Citadel Investment Group · behind Stronger Safer Nation and SLF PAC | $2.3M |
| Person · behind TD PAC | $1.6M |
| Organization · behind Stronger Safer Nation | $898K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind AB PAC | $545.3K |
| Organization · behind Stronger Safer Nation | $449K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind AB PAC | $408.5K |
| Organization · behind AB PAC | $364.5K |
| Organization · behind Stronger Safer Nation and SLF PAC | $361.8K |
| Person · Executive, IJS Investments · behind Stronger Safer Nation | $359.2K |
| Organization · behind Stronger Safer Nation and SLF PAC | $340.7K |
Read for the 18 largest groups of 48, 98% of the $29.5M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $132,167 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $12,197,629
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,240 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
31 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $217,273 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments · 35% of all spending | $4,848,810 |
| 23 payments · 24% of all spending | $3,298,552 |
| 34 payments · 12% of all spending | $1,615,567 |
| 29 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $346,680 |
| 19 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $290,798 |
| 6 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $163,670 |
| 33 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $154,866 |
| 6 payments · 1% of all spending | $133,922 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 21,387 contributions · 43% of ranked | $1,932,984 |
| 154 contributions · 5.4% of ranked | $244,536 |
| 184 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $192,697 |
| 167 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $170,642 |
| 85 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $148,064 |
| 252 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $125,910 |
| 51 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $83,320 |
| 61 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $82,818 |
A further $239,293 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,074,904) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.