FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00701672 · files quarterly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$726.2K raised, $1.2M spent, $49.4K cash on hand (through Sep 30, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
32% in transfers from related committees · 26% from donors giving over $200 · largest donor Tuberville Victory Fund, $208.8K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$2K given to candidates and committees, the largest to Bill Hagerty ($2K) · 100% of its support to Republicans. See where it goes
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$2K to 1 candidate
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $2,000
Republican 100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
$2,000 in 1 payment
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Republican candidates
1
$2K · 100%
All recipients
1
$2K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
Bars drawn to $2K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Bill Hagerty1 receipt, latest Dec 16, 2025Team Hagerty · S0TN00169$2K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $726,223 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
TransfersMoney moved in from affiliated committees.$229,12332%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$191,24526%
Largest donors
James A. Brown Jr.2 contributions, latest Jul 22, 2025 · FLORENCE, SC$26,500
James McLane3 contributions, latest Jul 22, 2025 · VESTAVIA, AL$5,500
Alice L. Stephens2 contributions, latest Jul 22, 2025 · TALLAHASSEE, FL$4,300
Philip F. AnschutzOne contribution on Jul 22, 2025 · DENVER, CO$3,500
Candace P. BrownOne contribution on Jul 22, 2025 · FLORENCE, SC$3,500
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,760 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $191.1K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$175,61224%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$127,50018%
The 10 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$2,7420.4%
Total reported receipts $726,223
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Where the money traces to $726.2K followed back through up to 3 committees
52% to named individuals, 45% not itemized.
Gave directly$234.6K 32%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Not itemized by this committee18%
$132,800
James A. Brown Jr.Person · Florence, SC · 3.6%
$26,500
Rita J. ArmitagePerson · Vestavia, AL · 1.4%
$10,500
Jacqueline BradleyPerson · Keswick, VA · 1.4%
$10,500
Richard GilliamPerson · Charlottesville, VA · also behind 2 other groups · 1.4%
$10,500
Geoffrey RehnertPerson · Boston, MA · 1.4%
$10,500
Claudia H. PeltzPerson · Palm Beach, FL · 1.2%
$8,500
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $437,448 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $7.7K
$7.7K+
$30.6K+
$69K+
$122.6K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Alabama721 contributions · 44%
$191,543
Florida101 contributions · 11%
$46,762
Virginia55 contributions · 8.9%
$39,107
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $1,209,139 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$744,71962%
Paid to
TAG LLC6 payments · latest Jul 31, 2025 · EMAIL SERVICES / DIGITAL FUNDRAISING CONSULTING / SMS MESSAGING / MMS MESSAGING / DESIGN SERVICE / W$137,349
Fundraising Inc.10 payments · latest Mar 26, 2026 · FUNDRAISING CONSULTING / FOOD / BEVERAGE / DELIVERY SERVICE / TRAVEL$86,873
Direct Mail Processors6 payments · latest Jun 23, 2025 · DIRECT MAIL SERVICES$10,786
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$462,42038%
Paid to
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$2,0000.2%
Total reported disbursements $1,209,139
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
What the payments were for $903,719 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$262,31329%
Filed as
POSTAGE$84,654
PRINTING$52,932
DIRECT MAIL SERVICES$52,585
DEBT PMT: DIRECT MAIL SERVICES$33,255
DEBT PMT: POSTAGE$23,823
PRINTING / POSTAGE / DELIVERY SERVICE$8,590
OFFICE SUPPLIES / PRINTING$6,475
Paid to
Fulfillment Solutions Inc.$70,267
Spending over time
$1.2M spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $552.3K, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2025.
$1.2M
Jan 2025Sep 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No Lobbying Disclosure Act filings were matched to this committee. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Tuberville for Senate, Inc. is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Senate campaign committee. It is a principal campaign committee. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
$159K across 47 recipient committees, or 13% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Nelson PeltzPerson · Palm Beach, FL · 1.2%
$8,500
Arthur ChoatePerson · Coral Gables, FL · also behind 1 other group · 0.9%
$6,500
James McLanePerson · Vestavia, AL · 0.8%
$5,500
Show 1 more source
Gave directly, more
Name
Amount
Alice L. StephensPerson · Tallahassee, FL · 0.6%
$4,300
Through Tuberville Victory Fund$148.9K 21%
Through Tuberville Victory Fund
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Tuberville Victory Fund18%
$133,635
William C. Bailey Jr.Person · CEO, Radiance Technologies · Arab, AL · 1.1%
$7,776
John ChildsPerson · Chairman, J.W. Childs Associates · Vero Beach, FL · also behind 4 other groups · 0.5%
$3,733
Stephen SchwarzmanPerson · CEO and Chairman, Blackstone · New York, NY · also behind 13 other groups · 0.5%
$3,733
Through One Team Senate Majority$4.8K 0.7%
Through One Team Senate Majority
Name
Amount
Not itemized by One Team Senate Majority0.7%
$4,804
Through Charter Communications Inc. PACTelecom & cable$4.4K 0.6%
Through Charter Communications Inc. PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Charter Communications Inc. PAC0.6%
$4,430
Through The Cigna Group Employee PACHealth insurers$4.3K 0.6%
Through The Cigna Group Employee PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by The Cigna Group Employee PAC0.6%
$4,312
Through Aflac PACInsurance (not health)$4.3K 0.6%
Through Aflac PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Aflac PAC0.6%
$4,293
2589 smaller sources, $306.9K in all (42%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Texas113 contributions · 6.3%
$27,494
South Carolina18 contributions · 5.7%
$25,065
New York39 contributions · 3.8%
$16,422
California109 contributions · 2.7%
$11,599
Massachusetts10 contributions · 2.5%
$10,762
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 1,390 contributions · 50% of ranked
$118,427
Synergi Partners1 contribution · 9.7% of ranked
$23,000
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 61 contributions · 3.7% of ranked
$8,636
Audax Group1 contribution · 3% of ranked
$7,000
Cumberland Development1 contribution · 3% of ranked
$7,000
Winklevoss Capital Management4 contributions · 3% of ranked
$7,000
Trian Fund Management2 contributions · 2.5% of ranked
$6,000
Saildrone2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked
$5,102
A further $249,275 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($175,612) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 1,390 contributions · 54% of ranked
$118,427
CEO12 contributions · 9.3% of ranked
$20,167
Founder Co-ceo1 contribution · 3.2% of ranked
$7,000
Founder6 contributions · 3.1% of ranked
$6,735
President8 contributions · 2.7% of ranked
$5,935
Investor1 contribution · 2.3% of ranked
$5,000
HomemakerWritten instead of an occupation · 15 contributions · 2.1% of ranked
$4,649
Owner7 contributions · 2% of ranked
$4,248
A further $249,275 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($175,612) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
True North PAC1 payment · latest Jul 22, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION REFUND TO COMMITTEE$5,000
United States Peanut PAC1 payment · latest Jul 22, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION REFUND TO COMMITTEE$5,000
MDI Imaging and Mail
$53,857
HSP Direct LLC$37,192
Postage for Direct Mail Fundraising LLC$35,751
Onpoint Data Strategy$18,537
Direct Mail Processors$10,786
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$232,87626%
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$20,0082.2%
Filed as
CAMPAIGN VEHICLE LEASE EXPENSE$19,908
DELIVERY SERVICE$100
Paid to
Mcgraw-Webb Chevrolet$11,867
Acura Financial Services$8,042
Fedex$90
Fundraising Inc.$10
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$7,6790.8%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEES$5,749
CREDIT CARD PAYMENT$1,930
Paid to
Win RED Technical Services LLC$4,197
Card Services$1,930
Elite Card Processing$1,548
Anedot$3
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$5,4320.6%
Filed as
PROCESSING FEES$3,951
CAMPAIGN VEHICLE REGISTRATION FEE$881
BANK FEES$600
Paid to
Win RED Technical Services LLC$3,951
Lee County Revenue Commissioner$881
Middletown Valley Bank$550
Chain Bridge Bank$50
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$2,0000.2%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$2,000
Paid to
Team Hagerty$2,000
Total itemized disbursements $903,719
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 439 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
24 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $71,998 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
TAG LLC6 payments · 11% of all spending
$137,349
Fundraising Inc.10 payments · 7.2% of all spending
$86,873
Crosby Ottenhoff Group16 payments · 6.2% of all spending
$75,121
Card Services21 payments · 6% of all spending
$72,555
Fulfillment Solutions Inc.13 payments · 5.8% of all spending
$70,267
MDI Imaging and Mail10 payments · 4.5% of all spending
$53,857
HSP Direct LLC9 payments · 3.1% of all spending
$37,192
Cmdi21 payments · 3.1% of all spending
$37,000
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.