FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00901918 · files quarterly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$22.3M raised, $17.5M spent, $4.8M cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
67% from donors giving over $200 · 27% from donors giving $200 or less · largest donor Team Paxton, $822.7K. See who funds it
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
$1.4M from 114 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $22,319,359 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$14,918,94167%
Largest donors
Steve Ledwell4 contributions, latest Mar 27, 2026 · TEXARKANA, TX$42,000
John ShieldsOne contribution on Sep 3, 2026 · ATTORNEY · SELF-EMPLOYED · SAN ANTONIO, TX$25,000
R. Mike Ward3 contributions, latest Sep 23, 2026 · DEVELOPER · DOUBLE DIAMOND INC. · DALLAS, TX$22,000
Lezlie Lowe2 contributions, latest Nov 28, 2025 · PLANO, TX$21,000
Stuart Parsons3 contributions, latest Oct 24, 2025 · CLIFTON, TX$21,000
Theodore Paul Palles3 contributions, latest Jun 23, 2026 · SELF-EMPLOYED · PALLAS · DALLAS, TX$20,500
Michael Fuljenz3 contributions, latest Sep 24, 2026 · PRESIDENT · UNIVERSAL COIN & BULLION · BEAUMONT, TX$17,000
Dalton L. Lott2 contributions, latest Jun 19, 2026 · DUNCANVILLE, TX$16,500
Robert Lehmann2 contributions, latest Jun 29, 2026 · NACOGDOCHES, TX$16,000
Lee HughesOne contribution on Sep 8, 2026 · MAVERICK HOMES · EXECUTIVE · FORT WORTH, TX$15,000
John H. Shields3 contributions, latest Apr 21, 2026 · ATTORNEY · SELF-EMPLOYED · SAN ANTONIO, TX$15,000
Clifton Thomas2 contributions, latest Oct 5, 2026 · C.E.O./OWNER · C. L. THOMAS, INC. · VICTORIA, TX$15,000
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 64,741 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $15.5M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$6,070,89927%
TransfersMoney moved in from affiliated committees.$853,6333.8%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$392,1501.8%
The 8 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Party committeesNational, state, and local committees of a political party.$62,0000.3%
Party committees that gave
NRSC1 receipt, latest Jun 10, 2026 · Party committee (qualified)$62,000
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$21,737<0.1%
Total reported receipts $22,319,359
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $22.3M followed back through up to 3 committees
5% to named individuals, 93% not itemized.
Gave directly$20.2M 91%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Not itemized by this committee91%
$20,233,477
Through Team Paxton$485.7K 2.2%
Through Team Paxton
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Team Paxton2.2%
$485,748
229 smaller sources, $1.2M in all (5.2%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $15,483,998 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $448.2K
$448.2K+
$1.8M+
$4M+
$7.2M+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Texas40,775 contributions · 72%
$11,205,934
Florida3,268 contributions · 4.3%
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $17,534,951 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$17,417,39299%
Paid to
Rockwell Solutions65 payments · latest Oct 5, 2026 · FUNDRAISING DIRECT MAIL$4,625,059
Ruby Mountain Strategies7 payments · latest Oct 7, 2026 · POLITICAL STRATEGY CONSULTING/EVENT PRODUCTION/SECURITY$326,156
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$116,3590.7%
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$1,200<0.1%
Total reported disbursements $17,534,951
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the earmarked money was headed $6.8K named
A conduit collects money that is legally someone else’s: the donor picks the recipient, and the conduit passes it on. The recipient is named in the filing’s memo line with its FEC committee id, so each row below is matched on that id rather than on the committee name the filer typed.
$6.8K across 14 receipts that named a destination, out of the 64,741 largest read. Receipts filed without a committee id in the memo are not counted here.
What the payments were for $17,417,392 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$6,231,34736%
Filed as
FINANCE CONSULTING - DIRECT MAIL$4,332,812
FINANCE CONSULTING - TELEMARKETING$427,847
FINANCE CONSULTING$418,511
Spending over time
$17.5M spent from Apr 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $7.1M, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
$17.5M
Apr 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No Lobbying Disclosure Act filings were matched to this committee. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Ken Paxton for Senate is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Senate campaign committee. It is a principal campaign committee. Its FEC record names Team Paxton as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
$666,183
California3,164 contributions · 3.4%
$519,069
New York959 contributions · 1.7%
$266,933
Virginia1,081 contributions · 1.2%
$185,083
Illinois1,082 contributions · 1.1%
$171,949
Pennsylvania866 contributions · 1%
$148,085
Arizona997 contributions · 0.9%
$136,663
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 48,516 contributions · 63% of ranked
$6,793,757
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 3,793 contributions · 14% of ranked
$1,510,176
HomemakerWritten instead of an employer · 298 contributions · 2.2% of ranked
$236,523
Ryan LLC48 contributions · 1.4% of ranked
$152,000
Entrepreneur156 contributions · 0.9% of ranked
$91,808
Republic Amusements5 contributions · 0.5% of ranked
$49,000
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 112 contributions · 0.3% of ranked
$37,040
Lott Companies4 contributions · 0.3% of ranked
$34,000
A further $1,258,521 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($6,070,899) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 48,585 contributions · 52% of ranked
$6,816,502
CEO333 contributions · 5% of ranked
$646,139
Attorney578 contributions · 3.2% of ranked
$422,245
President203 contributions · 2.1% of ranked
$268,252
Owner434 contributions · 1.9% of ranked
$253,959
HomemakerWritten instead of an occupation · 321 contributions · 1.9% of ranked
$244,235
Real Estate241 contributions · 1.8% of ranked
$234,675
Physician615 contributions · 1.7% of ranked
$216,941
A further $1,269,609 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($6,070,899) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
FINANCE CONSULTING/TRAVEL
$329,790
FINANCE CONSULTING - DIGITAL$260,392
POLITICAL STRATEGY CONSULTING/EVENT PRODUCTION/SECURITY/TRAVEL$183,667
FUNDRAISING DIRECT MAIL$97,303
POLITICAL STRATEGY CONSULTING/EVENT PRODUCTION/SECURITY$79,910
EVENT SPACE RENTAL/PRODUCTION/SOFTWARE/POLLING/TRAVEL$45,315
FINANCE CONSULTING/TEST MESSAGING$22,744
EVENT EXPENSE$20,994
FINANCE CONSULTING - TELECOMM$10,596
Paid to
Rockwell Solutions$4,409,140
Solutions for Texas in Fundraising LLC$601,033
Direct Response LLC$459,418
Ruby Mountain Strategies$308,891
Hall, LLC$196,311
FYM Strategies$121,520
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$4,966,33529%
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$77,0590.4%
Filed as
PAYROLL/TAXES/INSURANCE$34,998
BANK FEE$24,875
REGISTRATION FEE$10,000
PAYMENT PROCESSING FEES$3,335
CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FEES$2,293
EARKMARK PROCESSING FEE$1,406
BANK FEES/INTEREST$145
EARMARK PROCESSING FEES$8
Paid to
Insperity$34,998
Chain Bridge Bank$25,019
Republican Party of Texas$10,000
Reservation Management Solutions Inc$3,335
Conservative Political Action Conference$2,293
Club for Growth PAC$1,413
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$14,795<0.1%
Filed as
COLLATERAL MATERIALS - TSHIRTS$4,592
COLLATERAL MATERIALS - SWAG/SHIRTS/HATS$4,002
COLLATERAL MATERIALS - LETTERHEAD$1,648
INTERNET SERVICE$1,627
COLLATERAL MATERIALS - LAPEL STICKERS$1,417
CAMPAIGN EXPENSE$1,309
TELECOMMUNICATIONS/INTERNET$200
Paid to
Axiom Strategies$7,657
Supreme Discount Uniforms$4,002
Starlink$1,222
Uptown Glencoe$1,000
AT&T$605
GS-JJ$309
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$5,000<0.1%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION - NON FEDERAL$5,000
Paid to
Republican Party of Texas$5,000
Total itemized disbursements $17,417,392
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 2,257 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
9 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $304,764 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Rockwell Solutions65 payments · 26% of all spending
$4,625,059
Axmedia6 payments · 14% of all spending
$2,495,000
WinRed Technical Services, LLC25 payments · 11% of all spending
$1,856,209
The Prosper Group19 payments · 7.5% of all spending
$1,322,435
Axcapital LLC4 payments · 4.5% of all spending
$792,645
WinRed Technical Services LLC307 payments · 4.2% of all spending
$739,607
Solutions for Texas in Fundraising LLC11 payments · 3.4% of all spending
$601,033
Axiom Strategies30 payments · 3.2% of all spending
$564,710
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.