Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
Drug makers & biotechDrug and biotech companies, with their PACs and trade groups. Pharmacies and distributors are under Other health companies.Business › HealthPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
PAC (nonqualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACCorporationSausalito, CaliforniaActive
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00850339 · files quarterly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 6 | $12,700 | $0 | $12,700 | 59% |
| Democratic | 6 | $7,000 | $0 | $7,000 | 32% |
| Other or unresolved | 2 | $2,000 | $0 | $2,000 | 9.2% |
| Shown support | 14 | $21,700 | $0 | $21,700 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 11 | $13K · 27% |
| Republican candidates | 11 | $19.7K · 41% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 2 | $2K · 4.2% |
| Other PACs and committees | 5 | $13K · 27% |
| All recipients | 29 | $47.7K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Ohio | 5 | $7K |
| Kentucky | 2 | $4.7K |
| Oklahoma | 2 | $4.5K |
| California | 3 | $4K |
| Pennsylvania | 2 | $3.5K |
| Massachusetts | 2 | $3K |
| Florida | 2 | $2K |
| Washington | 1 | $1K |
The largest 8 of 13 states.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $4.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to LANGWORTHY LEADERSHIP & ACCOUNTABILITY FUND · 3 payments | $3.7K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to MULLIN VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $3.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to FRIENDS OF KENNEDY · 2 payments |
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 631 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $51.5K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $54,648
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
92% to named individuals, 1.2% to organizations, 6.5% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Exec. DIR., GOV. Affairs, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 16% | $8,832 |
| Person · Exec. VP, Head of R&D, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 16% | $8,832 |
| Person · Exec. VP, Chief People Officer, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 13% | $6,912 |
| Person · SEN. VP, US Market Access, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 9.9% | $5,405 |
| Person · Chief Tech. OPS. Officer, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 6.7% | $3,648 |
| 6.5% | $3,530 |
| Person · Chief Information Officer, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 4.9% |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 633 contributions · 100% | $51,118 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 631 contributions · 100% of ranked | $51,502 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,903) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $48,575
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $48,190
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 86 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
$48.6K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $21.1K, Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Besides giving through its PAC, Sarepta Therapeutics pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $282.5K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “SAREPTA THERAPEUTICS”, found by searching “SAREPTA THERAPEUTICS”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Nov 9, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (nonqualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
Bars drawn to $5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
| $3.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to MORE DEMOCRATIC DISTRICTS · 3 payments | $3K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TEAM JOYCE FOR PENNSYLVANIA · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BALDERSON VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $2.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to JAKE AUCHINCLOSS VICTORY FUND · 4 payments | $2K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to SHORING UP REPUBLICAN FUTURES FUND (SURF FUND) · 2 payments | $2K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $1.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $1K |
$47.7K across 25 recipient committees, or 98% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $2,679 |
| Person · Exec. DIR., Corp. Transactions, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 3.3% | $1,786 |
| Person · Director, Federal Affairs, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 2.6% | $1,400 |
| Person · Exec. VP, Chief General Counsel, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 2.5% | $1,344 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Head of Investor Relations, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 2.5% | $1,344 |
| Person · SEN. DIR., US Market Access, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 2.2% | $1,189 |
| Person · SEN. DIR., SCI. & REG. Policy, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 2.1% | $1,148 |
| Person · Senior DIR., National Accounts, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 2.1% | $1,148 |
| Person · Global Medical Affairs, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 2.1% | $1,140 |
| Person · Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 1.4% | $779 |
| Person · SEN. DIR., Vector BIO., Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 1.4% | $756 |
| Organization · 1.2% | $660 |
| Person · Associate Director, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 1% | $560 |
| Person · Director, Laboratory Systems, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 0.9% | $500 |
| Person · Associate Director in RNA Process Deve, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 0.7% | $380 |
| Person · VP, Patient Affairs, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 0.6% | $342 |
| Person · Senior Director, State Government Affa, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. · Cambridge, MA · 0.6% | $304 |
1 smaller source, $30 in all (<0.1%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| $9,024 |
| 47 contributions · 18% of ranked | $9,024 |
| 36 contributions · 14% of ranked | $6,912 |
| 47 contributions · 11% of ranked | $5,405 |
| 19 contributions · 7.2% of ranked | $3,648 |
| 47 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $2,679 |
| 36 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $2,060 |
| 47 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $1,786 |
A further $395 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,903) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 10% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 3 payments · 9.3% of all spending | $4,500 |
| 3 payments · 7.6% of all spending | $3,700 |
| 2 payments · 7.2% of all spending | $3,500 |
| 2 payments · 7.2% of all spending | $3,500 |
| 3 payments · 6.2% of all spending | $3,000 |
| 1 payment · 5.1% of all spending | $2,500 |
| 2 payments · 5.1% of all spending | $2,500 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.