Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00692897 · files quarterly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. · 2 payments | $60K |
| PAC (qualified) · 3 payments | $30K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY · 4 payments | $20K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS · 4 payments | $20K |
| PAC (qualified) · 4 payments | $20K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to ALZHEIMER'S IMPACT MOVEMENT · 3 payments | $20K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA) · 5 payments | $18.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION · 4 payments | $17.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS · 6 payments | $17.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC. · 4 payments | $17K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to LEIDOS, INC. · 4 payments | $15K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $15K |
$2.2M from 469 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to COLLINS VICTORY COMMITTEE · 15 payments | $3.9M |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 11 payments | $731K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to COLLINS VICTORY COMMITTEE · 8 payments | $659.8K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to COLLINS VICTORY COMMITTEE · 8 payments | $462.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to HUMANE WORLD ACTION FUND · 1 payment | $1.5K |
$5.8M across 5 recipient committees, or 88% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,359 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $4.9M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $7,112,328
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
32% to named individuals, 0.6% to organizations, 60% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 47% | $3,340,207 |
| Person · Retired · Piedmont, CA · 2.8% | $200,000 |
| Person · Consultant, Civic Service Inc. · Saint Louis, MO · 1% | $70,000 |
| Person · Chairman & CEO, General Atomics · La Jolla, CA · 0.7% | $50,000 |
| Person · Chairman, Duquesne Family Office LLC · New York, NY · 0.7% | $50,000 |
| Person · Owner, Capital Funding Group · Melbourne Beach, FL · 0.7% | $50,000 |
| Person · Winery Executive, Millbrook Capital · Palm Beach, FL · 0.7% |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 120 contributions · 20% | $982,777 |
| 138 contributions · 15% | $753,398 |
| 108 contributions · 14% |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $6,571,577
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
A conduit collects money that is legally someone else’s: the donor picks the recipient, and the conduit passes it on. The recipient is named in the filing’s memo line with its FEC committee id, so each row below is matched on that id rather than on the committee name the filer typed.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · 31 receipts · latest Aug 27, 2026 | $44.8K |
$44.8K across 31 receipts that named a destination, out of the 1,359 largest read. Receipts filed without a committee id in the memo are not counted here.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$6.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.9M, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Collins Victory Committee is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (nonqualified). It is a joint fundraiser. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
| $50,000 |
| Person · CIO, Oaktree CAP · Los Angeles, CA · 0.7% | $50,000 |
| Person · Retired · Los Angeles, CA · also behind 1 other group · 0.7% | $50,000 |
| Person · Chairman Emeritus, COX Enterprises, Inc. · Atlanta, GA · 0.7% | $50,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Inventor, Spring Tide Partners · Larkspur, CA · 0.7% | $50,000 |
| Person · Managing Partner, Paradigm · San Franciso, CA · 0.7% | $50,000 |
| Person · Owner, TL Management · New York, NY · 0.7% | $50,000 |
| Person · Founder, World Wide Technology · Maryland Heights, MO · 0.7% | $50,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.8% | $54,005 |
10697 smaller sources, $2.4M in all (33%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| $659,518 |
| 239 contributions · 7.4% | $359,200 |
| 36 contributions · 4.6% | $223,750 |
| 46 contributions · 4.4% | $214,900 |
| 156 contributions · 4.3% | $212,250 |
| 28 contributions · 3% | $146,729 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 217 contributions · 29% of ranked | $1,126,167 |
| Written instead of an employer · 46 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $144,485 |
| 18 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $95,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $70,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 13 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $60,729 |
| 1 contribution · 1.3% of ranked | $50,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $50,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.3% of ranked | $50,000 |
A further $11,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($6,289) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 219 contributions · 24% of ranked | $1,134,167 |
| 107 contributions · 9.3% of ranked | $446,400 |
| 106 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $225,750 |
| 24 contributions · 4.4% of ranked | $209,000 |
| 66 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $184,750 |
| 26 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $161,900 |
| 21 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $153,250 |
| 22 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $139,750 |
A further $18,500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($6,289) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $6,569,999
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,192 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 15 payments · 60% of all spending | $3,927,290 |
| 11 payments · 11% of all spending | $731,049 |
| 8 payments · 10% of all spending | $659,826 |
| 8 payments · 7% of all spending | $462,473 |
| 15 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $259,105 |
| 21 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $160,352 |
| 22 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $142,414 |
| 1,067 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $114,182 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.