Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted.Find your ballot →
PACs › Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) › 2025–2026
CA
Casa in Action PAC
Democratic & progressive groupsOn the Democratic side by their own words, their main funder, or a published source a reviewer cites. A caucus’s PAC is here. A group with one cause is filed under that cause instead.Political groupsPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
Super PAC (independent expenditure-only)Hyattsville, MarylandActive
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00685693 · files quarterly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$1.4M raised, $1.4M spent, $581.8K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
50% from PACs and other committees · 49% from donors giving over $200 · largest donor Casa in Action, $361.7K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$90.3K spent for candidates and $10.6K against them, most on PA-10 ($23.4K) · 81% of its support to Democrats, 19% to candidates of other or unresolved parties. See where it goes
Audits and penalties
2 administrative fines, published by the FEC
Where it spendsWhich races and candidates is its money for or against?
For or against 8 candidates$100,929
In regular reports
$53.2K
8 candidates, through Oct 14, 2026
Newer notices
$47.8K
21 notices since Oct 14, 2026
Janelle Stelson▲ For · House, PA-10$29.7K of it in newer notices, latest Oct 31, 2026 · FEC filing$47K
Kamala Harris▲ For · President7 records, latest Jan 6, 2025 · FEC filing$11.6K
Elaine Luria▲ For · House, VA-02All in newer notices, latest Oct 31, 2026 · FEC filing$9.5K
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$90.3K to 7 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $90,349
Democratic 81%Other or unresolved 19%
Against candidates $10,580
Republican 72%Democratic 28%
Support by the party of the candidate
Party of the candidate
Candidates
Direct
Independent
Amount
Share
Democratic
4
$0
$72,914
$72,914
81%
Other or unresolved
3
$0
$17,435
$17,435
19%
Shown support
7
$0
$90,349
$90,349
100%
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Vote Save America2 receipts, latest Aug 31, 2026 · Pac (qualified)$30,000
The 5 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$679,65549%
Largest donors
Casa in Action4 contributions, latest Feb 24, 2026 · Organization · 501(c)(4) social welfare organization · does not disclose its donors · HYATTSVILLE, MD$361,747
Allen ErenbaumOne contribution on Aug 12, 2025 · ATTORNEY · ERENBAUM LEGAL STRATEGIES · LOS ANGELES, CA$500
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 75 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $679.7K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$9,1510.7%
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$755<0.1%
Total reported receipts $1,384,560
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $1.4M followed back through up to 3 committees
11% to named individuals, 22% to organizations, 33% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 33% not itemized.
Gave directly$776.7K 56%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Casa in ActionOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 26%
$361,747
Children's Equity FundOrganization · 20%
$275,000
Wellness Advocacy FundOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 7.2%
$100,000
Elizabeth Allison ThomasPerson · Philanthropist, Self-Employed · Los Angeles, CA · also behind 1 other group · 2.2%
$30,000
Not itemized by this committee0.7%
$9,906
Through Communications Workers of America-COPE Political Contributions CommitteeService, health-care & other unions (including the AFL-CIO) (proposed)$246.1K 18%
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $679,654 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $14.7K
$14.7K+
$58.8K+
$132.3K+
$235.1K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Maryland27 contributions · 54%
$367,372
District of Columbia23 contributions · 41%
$278,941
California5 contributions · 4.6%
$31,516
Virginia8 contributions · 0.2%
$1,225
Massachusetts12 contributions · <0.1%
$600
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $1,355,846 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$1,091,49281%
Paid to
Casa in Action3 payments · latest Feb 23, 2026 · DEBT PAYMENTS - STAFF TIME$476,212
Base Builder27 payments · latest Nov 21, 2025 · CANVASSING SERVICES (NONFEDERAL)$221,072
Angela AlsobrooksSupport · 1 record · latest Jan 6, 2025$274
Total reported disbursements $1,355,846
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $1,343,452 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Field and canvassingDoor-to-door canvassing, phone banks and calls to voters, petition and signature gathering, and get-out-the-vote work.$21.9K of it was independent spending for Janelle Stelson and for T. Jonathan Ossoff$370,98128%
Filed as
CANVASSING SERVICES (NONFEDERAL)$221,072
CANVASSING SERVICES - NON - FEDERAL$94,623
Spending over time
$1.4M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $731.5K, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
$1.4M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$30,357
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$118,928
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$87,020
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$224,804
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$731,503
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$163,235
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Nov 8, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
LobbyingWhat does its sponsor lobby on?
No lobbying disclosures matched
A name search for “CASA IN ACTION” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Casa in Action PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Super PAC (independent expenditure-only). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
$585K from 5 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Through Communications Workers of America-COPE Political Contributions Committee
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Communications Workers of America-COPE Political Contributions Committee18%
Gregg OppenheimerPerson · Writer/consultant, Self-Employed · Santa Monica, CA · 0.5%
$7,542
Through Vote Save AmericaOther political groups (proposed)$21.5K 1.6%
Through Vote Save America
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Vote Save America1.6%
$21,547
238 smaller sources, $127.8K in all (9.2%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 9 contributions · 88% of ranked
$30,800
Luger Trust2 contributions · 2.9% of ranked
$1,000
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked
$516
Erenbaum Legal Strategies1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked
$500
Inline LLC2 contributions · 1.4% of ranked
$500
Klein Hornig LLP1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked
$500
Tcam LLC2 contributions · 1% of ranked
$350
Thousand Currents6 contributions · 0.9% of ranked
$300
A further $644,830 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($9,151) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Philanthropist2 contributions · 70% of ranked
$30,000
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 27 contributions · 18% of ranked
$7,833
Attorney2 contributions · 2.3% of ranked
$1,000
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 2 contributions · 1.8% of ranked
$766
Consultant2 contributions · 1.2% of ranked
$500
Consulting1 contribution · 1.2% of ranked
$500
Non-profit Manager1 contribution · 1.2% of ranked
$500
Trust Director1 contribution · 1.2% of ranked
$500
A further $636,747 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($9,151) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Base Builder33 payments · latest Oct 9, 2026 · NON-FEDERAL -SALARY$132,783
Pendulum Creative Group LLC2 payments · latest Sep 29, 2026 · CANVASSING LITERATURE - NON FEDERAL$14,714
CN4 Partners2 payments · latest Jun 29, 2026 · STRATEGIC CONSULTING - NON - FEDERAL$9,100
Facebook7 payments · latest Jul 17, 2026 · DIGITAL ADVERTISING - NON - FEDERAL$9,000
GRF Cpas & Advisors3 payments · latest Jun 29, 2026 · FINANCIAL SERVICES - NON -FEDERAL$7,124
Ravenna Strategies1 payment · latest May 30, 2025 · NON-FEDERAL DIGITAL ADVERTISING$7,000
Katz Compliance3 payments · latest Jun 29, 2026 · COMPLIANCE SERVICES - NON - FEDERAL$6,968
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$264,06120%
Filed as
SALARIES, PAYROLL TAXES, AND UTILITIES,$196,109
STAFF SALARIES (ADMIN/NONFED), PAYROLL TAXES, AND UTILITIES$62,095
FILING FEE$5,000
BANK FEES$858
Paid to
Casa in Action$258,203
Maryland State Board of Elections$5,000
Amalgamated Bank$858
Payroll and staffSalaries, wages, benefits, and payroll services.$20.7K of it was independent spending for Kamala Harris and for Robert P. Casey Jr. and 3 more$260,38819%
Filed as
DEBT PAYMENTS - STAFF TIME$218,009
NON-FEDERAL -SALARY$21,664
Staff Time - IE Debt Payment - 48H Report filed 2024 Q3Independent spending: $11.6K in support of Kamala Harris · $5.6K in support of Robert P. Casey Jr. and 3 more$20,715
Paid to
Casa in ActionIndependent spending: $11.6K in support of Kamala Harris · $5.6K in support of Robert P. Casey Jr. and 3 more$238,724
Base Builder$21,664
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$3.1K of it was independent spending against Scott Perry$150,72611%
Filed as
DIGITAL ADVERTISING (NONFEDERAL)$64,519
TV ADVERTISING (NONFEDERAL)$48,939
DIGITAL ADVERTISING - NON - FEDERAL$9,000
VIDEOGRAPHY SERVICES$8,032
NON-FEDERAL DIGITAL ADVERTISING$7,000
VIDEO PRODUCTION - PARTIAL PRE-PAYMENT OF IE$5,861
NON-FEDERAL VIDEOGRAPHY$2,823
Billboards AdvertisingIndependent spending in opposition to Scott Perry$1,622
Video ProductionIndependent spending in opposition to Scott Perry$1,465
NONFEDERAL - VIDEO PRODUCTION$1,465
Paid to
Ravenna Strategies$50,728
Univision Communications$48,939
Imagination MediaIndependent spending: $1.5K in opposition to Scott Perry$19,646
Facebook$17,029
Nordeast Digital LLC$12,000
Lamar AdvertisingIndependent spending in opposition to Scott Perry$1,622
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$109,5698.2%
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$1.5K of it was independent spending for Elaine Luria$76,1485.7%
Filed as
FINANCIAL SERVICES$33,904
REIMBURSEMENT$29,838
FINANCIAL SERVICES - NON -FEDERAL$7,124
VEHICLE RENTAL$2,403
Vehicle Rental - EstimateIndependent spending in support of Elaine Luria$1,451
NON-FEDERAL CAR RENTAL$507
TRANSLATION SERVICES$473
INTERPRETATION SERVICES$360
Banners and SignageIndependent spending in support of Elaine Luria$88
Paid to
GRF Cpas & Advisors$41,028
Joya, Hector$15,783
Zelaya, Eduardo$5,573
Allah, Shahada$2,686
Sixt Rental Cars$2,403
Hernandez, Marvin$1,584
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$58,9524.4%
Filed as
PRINTING SERVICES (NONFEDERAL)$41,418
NON-FEDERAL DOOR LITERATURE$6,918
PRINTING AND SHIPPING$5,189
GRAPHIC DESIGN$3,096
DOOR LITERATURE$980
DOOR LITERATURE - NON - FEDERAL$755
PRINTING - NON -FEDERAL$321
GRAPHIC DESIGN - NON -FEDERAL$275
Paid to
Minuteman Press Woodbridge$26,736
Wolf Printing Co.$18,444
The UPS Store 1161$5,189
Wolf Printing$3,911
Jackson Design LCC$2,000
Toledo, Tania$1,371
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$2.8K of it was independent spending for Elaine Luria$33,7582.5%
Filed as
MILEAGE$9,294
TRAVEL$7,108
LODGING$6,987
NON-FEDERAL MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT$3,340
Lodging - EstimateIndependent spending in support of Elaine Luria$1,396
Airfare - EstimateIndependent spending in support of Elaine Luria$1,274
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - NON - FEDERAL$1,200
MILEAGE (MULTIPLE DAYS)$1,000
NON - FEDERAL - MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT$861
NON - FEDERAL MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT$675
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT$524
Airfare - Actual Payment for estimated IE (reported on 10/03/2026)Independent spending in support of Elaine Luria$98
Paid to
AirbnbIndependent spending: $1.4K in support of Elaine Luria$5,557
Air BNB$2,233
Delta Air$1,639
Residence INN$1,469
Cintron, Rosemary$1,447
Travelperk$1,438
Office and administrativeRent, utilities, phones, supplies, equipment, security, food, and campaign merchandise.$3.1K of it was independent spending for Elaine Luria$13,6981%
Filed as
FOOD AND BEVERAGE$6,734
OFFICE SPACE RENTAL - ESTIMATEIndependent spending: $2.9K in support of Elaine Luria$3,126
PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES$1,137
OFFICE SUPPLIES$740
FOOD AND BEVERAGE - NON -FEDERAL$552
FOOD & BEVERAGE - NON - FEDERAL$546
FOOD & BEVERAGE$339
OFFICE RENTAL$250
Office Space Rental - ActualIndependent spending in support of Elaine Luria$250
FOOD AND BEVERAGE - ESTIMATE$24
Paid to
Regus Management Group BCIndependent spending in support of Elaine Luria$2,876
Chipotle$1,419
Panera Bread$1,256
Philip Laubner Photography$1,137
Uber$804
Burch, Derrick$800
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$3,4630.3%
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$1,227<0.1%
Filed as
NON-FEDERAL SUBSCRIPTION$1,227
Paid to
Dspolitical$1,227
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$481<0.1%
Filed as
CATERING$249
EVENT SPACE RENTAL$233
Paid to
Cheddar's Scratch Kitchen$249
Meyera E. Oberndorf Central Library$233
Total itemized disbursements $1,343,452
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 611 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
1 payment was reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $546 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Casa in Action18 payments · 37% of all spending
$496,927
Base Builder66 payments · 28% of all spending
$375,733
Katz Compliance21 payments · 5.4% of all spending
$72,730
Ravenna Strategies3 payments · 3.7% of all spending
$50,728
Univision Communications3 payments · 3.6% of all spending
$48,939
GRF Cpas & Advisors10 payments · 3% of all spending
$41,028
Minuteman Press Woodbridge9 payments · 2% of all spending
$26,824
Sandler, Reiff, Lamb, Rosenstein & Birkenstock, P.C9 payments · 1.8% of all spending
$23,893
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Base Builder33 payments, latest Oct 9, 2026NON-FEDERAL -SALARY$132.8K
Pendulum Creative Group LLC2 payments, latest Sep 29, 2026CANVASSING LITERATURE - NON FEDERAL$14.7K
CN4 Partners2 payments, latest Jun 29, 2026STRATEGIC CONSULTING - NON - FEDERAL$9.1K