This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$20K to 4 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $20,000
Democratic 100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
$65,000 in 14 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
4
$20K · 31%
Other PACs and committees
8
$45K · 69%
All recipients
12
$65K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
Analilia Mejia1 receipt, latest Nov 25, 2025Analilia Mejia for New Jersey · H6NJ11286$5K
Christian Menefee1 receipt, latest Nov 25, 2025Christian D. Menefee for Congress · H6TX18232$5K
Jordan Wood1 receipt, latest Jul 2, 2025Jordan for Maine · S6ME00332$5K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $195,173 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$145,50075%
Largest donors
Andy Berndt2 contributions, latest May 15, 2025 · VP AND MANAGING DIRECTOR · GOOGLE, INC. · MAPLEWOOD, NJ$45,000
Thomas McDougal2 contributions, latest May 21, 2025 · EDUCATION CONSULTANT · SELF EMPLOYED · CHICAGO, IL$11,780
Carol Winograd2 contributions, latest Apr 11, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · STANFORD, CA$6,000
Elliot BerndtOne contribution on May 15, 2025 · PHILANTHROPIST · N/A · MAPLEWOOD, NJ$5,000
Ross BoucherOne contribution on Jul 1, 2025 · ENGINEER · PLAYGROUND THEORY · SAN FRANCISCO, CA$5,000
Merle ChambersOne contribution on Mar 31, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · DENVER, CO$5,000
Jeffrey GuralOne contribution on Jun 3, 2026 · CHAIRMAN · GFP REAL ESTATE · MANHATTAN, NY$5,000
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 53 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $193.8K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$48,70125%
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$9730.5%
Total reported receipts $195,173
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $193,780 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $2K
$2K+
$8K+
$18K+
$32K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
New Jersey3 contributions · 26%
$50,000
California9 contributions · 17%
$33,500
New York7 contributions · 13%
$25,500
Pennsylvania9 contributions · 8.5%
$16,500
Massachusetts3 contributions · 7.7%
$15,000
Minnesota3 contributions · 7.7%
$15,000
Illinois2 contributions · 6.1%
$11,780
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $176,253 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$98,61456%
Paid to
Tesseract, Inc.26 payments · latest Aug 19, 2026 · REIMBURSEMENT OF OPERATING COSTS PAID ON BEHALF OF ORGANIZATION$64,040
Administrative Business Services LLC18 payments · latest Jun 2, 2026 · ACCOUNTING AND COMPLIANCE SERVICES$18,007
CT Corp.1 payment · latest Oct 27, 2025 · NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - BUSINESS REGISTRATIONS$116
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$10<0.1%
Total reported disbursements $176,253
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
What the payments were for $174,238 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$76,80144%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$65,000
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - EMAIL SERVICES$3,418
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - ACCOUNTING AND COMPLIANCE SERVICES$3,000
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - REIMBURSEMENT OF OPERATING COSTS PAID ON BEHALF OF ORGANIZATION$2,705
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - LODGING$816
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - DATABASE SOFTWARE$520
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - LEGAL FEES$465
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - RENTAL CAR$370
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - WEBSITE$204
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - BANK FEES$188
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - BUSINESS REGISTRATIONS$116
Paid to
Spending over time
$176.3K spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $67.5K, Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025.
$176.3K
Jan 2025Sep 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$16,779
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$17,315
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$16,792
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$57,912
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$67,456
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
1629 K STREET NORTHWESTSUITE 300WASHINGTON, DC, 20006
Audits and penalties
None published by the FEC
LobbyingWhat does its sponsor lobby on?
No lobbying disclosures matched
A name search for “TAXPAC” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
$65K across 12 recipient committees, or 37% of everything this committee reports spending.
Colorado2 contributions · 5.2%
$10,000
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Google INC3 contributions · 25% of ranked
$48,000
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 22 contributions · 25% of ranked
$47,500
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 7 contributions · 17% of ranked
$31,780
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 10 contributions · 10% of ranked
$19,000
Dominium2 contributions · 5.3% of ranked
$10,000
Stanford University2 contributions · 5.3% of ranked
$10,000
Andreessen Horowitz1 contribution · 2.6% of ranked
$5,000
Generation TUX1 contribution · 2.6% of ranked
$5,000
A further $5,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($973) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 22 contributions · 25% of ranked
$47,500
VP And Managing Director2 contributions · 23% of ranked
$45,000
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 9 contributions · 8.5% of ranked
$16,500
Education Consultant2 contributions · 6.1% of ranked
$11,780
Attorney4 contributions · 5.2% of ranked
$10,000
Investor2 contributions · 5.2% of ranked
$10,000
Professor2 contributions · 5.2% of ranked
$10,000
Chairman1 contribution · 2.6% of ranked
$5,000
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($973) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC$10,000
Blue DOG PAC$5,000
New Democrat Coalition Action Fund$5,000
CHC Bold PAC$5,000
Congressional Black Caucus PAC$5,000
Aspire PAC$5,000
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$64,50837%
Filed as
REIMBURSEMENT OF OPERATING COSTS PAID ON BEHALF OF ORGANIZATION$64,040
BUSINESS REGISTRATIONS$468
Paid to
Tesseract, Inc.$64,040
Delaware Division of Corporations$240
CT Corp.$228
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$23,80414%
Filed as
ACCOUNTING AND COMPLIANCE SERVICES$18,007
STRATEGIC CONSULTING$4,225
ACCOUNTING SOFTWARE$1,572
Paid to
Administrative Business Services LLC$18,007
Magalhaes, Chloe$3,225
Intuit$1,572
Summit Campaign Strategies, Inc.$1,000
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$4,7932.8%
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$4,2012.4%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEES$2,341
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEE$1,860
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$4,201
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$130<0.1%
Filed as
DATABASE SOFTWARE$130
Paid to
Integrated Solutions: Political$130
Total itemized disbursements $174,238
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 161 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
3 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $1,572 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Tesseract, Inc.29 payments · 38% of all spending
$66,745
Administrative Business Services LLC24 payments · 13% of all spending
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.