Democratic & progressive groupsOn the Democratic side by their own words, their main funder, or a published source a reviewer cites. A caucus’s PAC is here. A group with one cause is filed under that cause instead.Political groupsPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
$5M raised, $3.9M spent, $1.3M cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
63% from PACs and other committees · 20% from donors giving over $200 · largest donor Defend Democracy NOW PAC, $230K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$583.5K given to candidates and committees, the largest to DCCC ($30K) · 99.8% of its support to Democrats. See where it goes
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
Why this committee exists In its own words
“The NewDem Action Fund exists to do one thing: win the House majority and keep it in the hands of Democrats who actually deliver. We elect and re-elect pragmatic, pro-growth, pro-innovation advocates in the toughest districts in America. We’re focused on lowering costs, tackling America’s greatest challenges, and rooting out corruption in Washington DC. When the majority comes down to a handful of races, New Dems are in the trenches fighting to win with the most electable, battle tested, authentic candidates.
In 2024, New Dems protected 20 Frontline members and stopped the red wave cold. New Dems flipped 9 seats from Red to Blue and were the only ideological House PAC to grow House Democrats ranks. In 2026, we know this is a must-win cycle, and we're built for this fight.”
Describes itself as “pragmatic, pro-growth, pro-innovation”
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Its site sums up what it stands for in the statement above, and publishes no list of positions beyond it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$424K to 95 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $424,000
Democratic 99.8%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$583,500 in 266 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving. These are its own contributions. It also passed on $212,000 of people’s earmarked gifts, listed by recipient under Spending.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
139
$528.5K · 91%
Other or unresolved candidates
1
$1K · 0.2%
Other party committees
1
$30K · 5.1%
Other PACs and committees
20
$24K · 4.1%
All recipients
161
$583.5K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
California
17
$59.5K
Texas
10
$41K
New York
12
$40.5K
Virginia
8
$38K
Florida
6
$30K
Arizona
5
$28.5K
Iowa
4
$25K
Michigan
6
$23.5K
The largest 8 of 35 states.
Recipients 161
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $4,958,564 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$3,111,48563%
The 10 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$1,006,44720%
Largest donors
Jose Fernandez4 contributions, latest May 29, 2026 · SAN JUAN, PR$20,000
Jon Stryker4 contributions, latest Jul 27, 2026 · NEW YORK, NY$20,000
Steven Bills3 contributions, latest Jun 29, 2026 · SAN FRANCISCO, CA$15,000
Kimberly Shirley3 contributions, latest Jun 30, 2026 · MEDINA, WA$15,000
AK-Chin Indian Community2 contributions, latest Jun 26, 2026 · Organization · MARICOPA, AZ$10,000
Roger Altman2 contributions, latest Jul 9, 2026 · BANKER · EVERCORE · NEW YORK, NY$10,000
John Arnold2 contributions, latest Mar 23, 2026 · CO-FOUNDER · ARNOLD VENTURES · HOUSTON, TX$10,000
Laura Arnold2 contributions, latest Mar 23, 2026 · CO-FOUNDER · ARNOLD VENTURES · HOUSTON, TX$10,000
Reginald M. Ballantyne III2 contributions, latest May 12, 2026 · HEALTHCARE EXEC · RMB III CONSULTANCY · PARADISE VALLEY, AZ$10,000
Ann Doerr2 contributions, latest Apr 23, 2026 · PHILANTHROPIST · SELF EMPLOYED · SAN CARLOS, CA$10,000
John Doerr2 contributions, latest Apr 23, 2026 · VENTURE CAPITALIST · KLEINER PERKINS · SAN CARLOS, CA$10,000
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 954 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
TransfersMoney moved in from affiliated committees.$686,00014%
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$117,4262.4%
Other receiptsInterest, dividends and other income the committee files on a line of its own.$29,4040.6%
Where it came from
Amalgamated Bank16 receipts, latest Sep 30, 2026 · Washington, District of Columbia$29,396
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$7,8020.2%
Total reported receipts $4,958,564
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $5M followed back through up to 3 committees
34% to named individuals, 1.5% to organizations, 60% not itemized.
Gave directly$747.1K 15%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Not itemized by this committee14%
$717,683
Amalgamated BankOrganization · 0.6%
$29,396
Through Defend Democracy NOW PAC$600.1K 12%
Through Defend Democracy NOW PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Defend Democracy NOW PAC12%
$600,124
18899 smaller sources, $3.4M in all (69%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $1,032,747 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $9.1K
$9.1K+
$36.4K+
$81.9K+
$145.7K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California252 contributions · 22%
$227,625
New York101 contributions · 16%
$168,150
Illinois119 contributions · 9.5%
$98,400
District of Columbia60 contributions · 6.6%
$68,300
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $3,920,437 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$3,087,14179%
Its own contributions to candidates and committeesMoney given to federal candidates, party committees and other PACs.$583,50015%
Paid to
Earmarked gifts it passed onPeople’s own contributions that the committee collected and sent to the candidates and committees they named. Filed on the same line as its own contributions.$212,0005.4%
Sent to
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$37,4281%
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$367<0.1%
Paid to
Amalgamated Bank7 payments · latest Jul 29, 2026 · UNREALIZED LOSS IN INVESTMENT VALUE$6,430
US Department of the Treasury1 payment · latest Jan 13, 2026 · DISGORGEMENT OF OVER-LIMIT CONTRIBUTION FROM WILLIAM LITTLE$225
Total reported disbursements $3,920,437
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $3,669,412 itemized
The $212,000 in earmarked gifts it passed on is not in this list: it is people’s money, listed by recipient under “Earmarked gifts it passed on” above.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$973,08226%
Filed as
PAC FUNDRAISING CONSULTING SERVICES$572,000
Spending over time
$3.9M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $335.6K, May 2026.
$3.9M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$95,484
September 2026$267,584
August 2026$164,584
July 2026$201,217
June 2026$270,258
May 2026$335,591
April 2026$202,053
March 2026$165,949
February 2026$209,492
January 2026$176,891
December 2025$232,744
November 2025$172,035
October 2025$155,472
September 2025$125,011
August 2025$110,299
July 2025$124,108
June 2025$186,753
May 2025$206,278
April 2025$158,594
March 2025$171,503
February 2025$81,623
January 2025$106,914
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
Other disbursements $430
Amalgamated Bank7 payments, latest Jul 29, 2026UNREALIZED LOSS IN INVESTMENT VALUE$6.4K
US Department of the Treasury1 payment, latest Jan 13, 2026DISGORGEMENT OF OVER-LIMIT CONTRIBUTION FROM WILLIAM LITTLE$225
Little, William1 payment, latest Jan 13, 2026VOID OF UNCASHED REFUND CHECK ORIGINALLY SENT 2/13/23-$225
Making a Real Change - Marc PAC1 payment, latest Jan 13, 2026VOID OF UNCASHED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION ORIGINALLY DATED 4/28/2025-$1K
Emilia Sykes for Congress1 payment, latest Jan 13, 2026VOID OF UNCASHED CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION ORIGINALLY SENT 6/6/2024-$2.5K
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 12 payments totaling $430.
A name search for “NEW DEMOCRAT COALITION ACTION FUND” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
New Democrat Coalition Action Fund is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names Defend Democracy NOW PAC as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
New Democrat Coalition Action Fund is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Structured organization facts
Identity match
Exact FEC committee ID in LittleSis
Match confidence
high
Source coverage
Official pages captured
20
LittleSis classifications
Organization, Political Fundraising Committee, Other Campaign Committee
CBChristina BohannanDemocratic · U.S. House · IA-01 · via Christina Bohannan For Congress3 payments, latest Jun 3, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Jun 3, 2026$10K
RCRebecca CookeDemocratic · U.S. House · WI-03 · via Cooke For Congress3 payments, latest Jun 3, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Jun 3, 2026$10K
SLSusie LeeDemocratic · U.S. House · NV-03 · via Susie Lee For Congress5 payments, latest Nov 24, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Nov 24, 2025$8.5K
HCHenry CuellarDemocratic · U.S. House · TX-28 · via Texans For Henry Cuellar Congressional Campaign3 payments, latest Nov 24, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Nov 24, 2025$7.5K
VGVicente GonzalezDemocratic · U.S. House · TX-34 · via Vicente Gonzalez For Congress3 payments, latest Nov 24, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Nov 24, 2025$7.5K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Committees funding this one
Name
Amount
Defend Democracy NOW PACPAC (nonqualified) · Connected to NEW DEMOCRAT COALITION ACTION FUND · 1 payment
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Arizona35 contributions · 6.6%
$67,915
Washington58 contributions · 4.8%
$49,473
Massachusetts46 contributions · 4.5%
$46,700
Connecticut33 contributions · 4.3%
$44,694
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 542 contributions · 20% of ranked
$190,197
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 48 contributions · 6.1% of ranked
$59,410
Anthropic10 contributions · 5.1% of ranked
$50,000
Anthropic PBC5 contributions · 2.6% of ranked
$25,000
Arnold Ventures4 contributions · 2.1% of ranked
$20,000
Openai9 contributions · 1.9% of ranked
$18,002
Andreessen Horowitz3 contributions · 1.5% of ranked
$15,000
Inclusive Abundance Initiative3 contributions · 1.5% of ranked
$15,000
A further $60,500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($117,426) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 395 contributions · 14% of ranked
$139,685
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 149 contributions · 6% of ranked
$58,012
Investor13 contributions · 5% of ranked
$49,000
Attorney18 contributions · 4.1% of ranked
$39,650
CEO11 contributions · 3.3% of ranked
$31,750
Member Of Technical Staff6 contributions · 3.1% of ranked
$30,000
Finance6 contributions · 2.8% of ranked
$27,500
Banker5 contributions · 2.6% of ranked
$25,000
A further $58,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($117,426) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$285,6967.8%
Filed as
PAC COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING SERVICES$114,545
PAC ACCOUNTING SERVICES$73,292
PAC COMMUNICATION CONSULTING SERVICES$65,454
PAC LEGAL SERVICES$22,977
PAC DIGITAL CONSULTING SERVICES$9,427
Paid to
Kahn Communications$180,000
Political Compliance Management Services$73,292
Elias Law Group$22,977
Momentum Campaigns LLC$9,427
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$193,2055.3%
Filed as
PAC RETREAT EXPENSE$120,490
PAC RETREAT EXPENSES$46,112
PAC COMMUNICATION SERVICES$10,000
UNREALIZED LOSS IN INVESTMENT VALUE$6,430
PAC EMPLOYEE HEALTHCARE$3,658
PAC MERCHANDISE$3,104
PAC PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS$2,395
CAUCUS RETREAT EXPENSE$1,016
PAC JOB LISTING$212
PAC MEETING EXPENSE$207
CREDIT FOR FRAUDULENT CHARGE-$419
Paid to
Hyatt Regency Chesapeake BAY$114,990
NRG Management$46,112
Khan Communications$10,000
Amalgamated Bank$6,430
Reston BUS Travel Co.$5,500
DC Healthlink$3,658
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$126,8883.5%
Filed as
PAC TRAVEL$75,757
PAC RETREAT LODGING$25,851
PAC LODGING$13,785
PAC PARKING$7,228
PAC TRAVEL EXPENSE$2,976
PAC TRAVEL EXPENSES$903
PAC MILEAGE$225
TRAVEL$99
RE-ISSUE OF UNCASHED TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT ORIGINALLY SENT 6/1/2024$63
Paid to
Hyatt Regency Chesapeake BAY$23,679
American Airlines$15,772
Reston Coach Transportation$12,450
United Airlines$9,599
Colonial Parking$7,442
Lansdowne Resort$5,851
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$80,4262.2%
Filed as
PAC SOFTWARE$79,840
PAC WEBSITE EXPENSE$293
PAC WEBSITE HOSTING$293
Paid to
NGP VAN, Inc.$56,247
Mailchimp$7,648
Switchboard Public Benefits Corp$7,600
Hiview Solutions$3,591
Slack Technologies$1,203
Canva$1,025
Office and administrativeRent, utilities, phones, supplies, equipment, security, food, and campaign merchandise.$67,8311.8%
Filed as
PAC RENT$47,365
PAC MEETING FOOD AND BEVERAGE$6,477
PAC OFFICE SUPPLIES$6,100
PAC MEALS$5,627
PAC SUPPORTER GIFTS$1,896
PAC OFFICE MOVING SERVICES$321
PAC OFFICE SUPPLES$45
Paid to
Bernstein Management Group$42,865
Hyatt Regency Chesapeake BAY$5,112
Amazon Inc.$4,574
NRG Management$4,500
National Democratic Club$3,280
Studio Burke$1,548
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$37,1751%
Filed as
PAC CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEE$32,306
PAC CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEES$4,075
PAC CREDIT CARD FEE$750
PAC CREDIT CARD ACTIVATION FEE$44
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$32,590
ActBlue, Inc.$2,566
Democracy Engine, Inc., PAC$825
American Express$794
Democracy Engine$400
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$16,9500.5%
Filed as
PAC PRINTING SERVICES$8,245
PAC MERCHANDISE PRINTING$7,316
PAC POSTAGE, SHIPPING$506
PAC POSTAGE$375
PAC PRINTING$289
PAC POSTAGE AND SHIPPING$194
PAC POSTAGE & SHIPPING$25
Paid to
Thread Logic$7,316
The Blue Deal LLC$3,748
AMS Communications, Inc.$2,375
Printing Specialists$1,643
Customink$479
Fedex$389
Not broken out by the committeeReported as a lump sum, with memo entries pointed to for the detail. Where those entries were filed and read, this page counts the payees they name instead; what is left here was never itemised.$15,9390.4%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED:$11,861
PAC CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED:$3,058
CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$453
PAC EVENT REIMBURSEMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED:$399
MEETING REIMBURSEMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED:$114
PAC TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED:$54
Paid to
American Express$15,372
Andrea Mietus$399
Boyd, Nancy$114
Mietus Events$54
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$419<0.1%
Filed as
PAC SOCIAL MEDIA ADVERTISING$419
Paid to
X Corp$419
Total itemized disbursements $3,669,412
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,622 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
36 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $531,229 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
American Express22 payments · 14% of all spending
$540,744
Helen Milby & Co.23 payments · 12% of all spending
$484,000
Paychex45 payments · 7.4% of all spending
$289,368
Gonin, Jonathan23 payments · 4.6% of all spending
$180,928
Kahn Communications20 payments · 4.6% of all spending
$180,000
Impact Research, Inc9 payments · 3.9% of all spending
$153,861
Harrison, Bridgette16 payments · 2.9% of all spending
$113,534
JBW Consulting LLC22 payments · 2.8% of all spending
$110,000
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 3 payments
