Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › NY-03 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, NY-03
Representative since 2017
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
6 priorities from suozziforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Get rid of irresponsible tariffs that are driving up prices on groceries, cars, building materials, and everyday goods — while fighting for trade deals that bring manufacturing jobs back to America.
- Support the Stop Global Tariffs Act as a co-sponsor, which would roll back Trump’s tariff authority, refund businesses that paid them, and prevent them from coming back.
- As a member of the Ways and Means Committee, work to ensure that any renegotiation of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) trade agreement protects American interests while maintaining strong relationships with our allies.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · suozziforcongress.com/tom-suozzis-five-point-american-affordability-plan
- Stop pouring taxpayer money into a reckless war. Focus on smart diplomacy, modern defense spending that addresses today's threats, and stronger alliances that share the cost of keeping us safe.
- Exercise congressional oversight and reinforce the Constitution's limits on a president's ability to use our military to enter into conflict without congressional authorization.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · suozziforcongress.com/tom-suozzis-five-point-american-affordability-plan
Rein in federal spending so the government pays less in interest, reducing pressure on interest rates that affect mortgages, car loans, and credit card debt.
- Enact the Problem Solvers Caucus’ Fiscal Stability Framework:
- Fiscal Commission Act, which creates a bipartisan commission focused on reducing the debt.
- House Resolution, which would reduce the federal deficit to 3% from the current 6%, so we can fully fund safety-net programs while reducing wasteful spending.
- Sustainable Budget Act, which would establish a bipartisan process aimed at putting the federal budget on a sustainable long-term path.
- As a co-author, will fight to enact the bipartisan First-Time Homebuyers Affordability Act, which gives more first-time, low-income, and middle-income buyers access to low-interest mortgages.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · suozziforcongress.com/tom-suozzis-five-point-american-affordability-plan
Cut red tape so we can build energy projects faster — clean energy, natural gas, nuclear, transmission, and storage — to produce more energy, lower costs, and build a cleaner future.
- Enact the Problem Solvers Caucus’ Permitting Framework to make it easier to build energy projects and boost production
- Cutting red tape for linear infrastructure projects
- Meeting growing energy demand across sectors
- Reforming outdated and duplicative NEPA requirements
- Establishing clear, enforceable permitting deadlines
- Strengthening domestic supply chains
- Co-sponsor the Energy Bills Relief Act, which restores clean energy tax credits, provides incentives for wind and solar, promotes efficiency, and cracks down on price gouging.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · suozziforcongress.com/tom-suozzis-five-point-american-affordability-plan
Protect and strengthen the tax credits that lower your health insurance premiums, invest in prevention and primary care, and pass the WISH Act to make long-term care more affordable so seniors can stay in their homes.
- Pass the Bipartisan HOPE Act, authored by Suozzi, which would extend enhanced ACA premium tax credits for two years while adding income limits and safeguards against fraud.
- Enact the bipartisan WISH Act, authored by Suozzi, which would help seniors afford the care they need as they age.
- Co-authored the bipartisan Supporting Newborn Parents Act, which would give new parents up to a $2,000 baby bonus.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · suozziforcongress.com/tom-suozzis-five-point-american-affordability-plan
As a former Vice Chair of the bipartisan Problem Solvers caucus, Tom knows how to get things done.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · suozziforcongress.com
Heading as listed on suozziforcongress.com ↗ (opens suozziforcongress.com at this heading)
89% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 71 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Ways and Means
House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Suozzi’s 47 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00607200
84¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($6.4M of $7.6M). Cash on hand went from $2.4M on Mar 31, 2025 to $3.2M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $568,533 | $190,912 | $2,411,962 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $825,023 | $187,765 | $3,049,220 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $1,018,145 | $206,687 | $3,860,677 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $834,784 | $214,204 | $4,481,257 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $863,553 | $273,972 | $5,070,839 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jun 3, 2026 | $888,477 | $462,753 | $5,496,563 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $458,184 | $274,796 | $5,679,950 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $1,701,010 | $2,393,118 | $4,987,842 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $441,896 | $2,195,396 | $3,234,342 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
58 endorsers listed on Thomas R. Suozzi’s own campaign site: 2 parties, 30 unions, 25 organizations, 1 newspaper.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 20,820 votes (80%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Won · 141,870 votes (55%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 5,113 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $5M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 989 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.1M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 7 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 18 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $239.2K.
Total reported receipts $7,599,603
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
58% of the money placed by state came from inside New York: $2.9M of $5M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3,094 contributions · 58% | $2,915,129 |
| 434 contributions · 9.7% | $486,433 |
| 215 contributions · 6.1% | $304,718 |
| 126 contributions · 4% | $202,467 |
| 119 contributions · 2.8% | $142,851 |
| 118 contributions · 2.6% | $131,590 |
| 74 contributions · 2.1% | $105,765 |
| 113 contributions · 1.8% | $90,456 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 51 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 2,114 contributions · 40% of ranked | $1,357,454 |
| Written instead of an employer · 508 contributions · 17% of ranked | $560,307 |
| 45 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $51,250 |
| 30 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $28,750 |
| 9 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $28,100 |
| 10 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $22,500 |
| 13 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $20,750 |
| 18 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $17,000 |
A further $101,607 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($312,726) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Suozzi’s campaign or spending on ads about Suozzi are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 41% to named individuals, 46% to organizations, 4.8% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 0.6% to committees nothing more could be followed from, 8% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · behind Article One PAC | $884.1K |
| Organization · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and Maga Inc. | $517.6K |
| Person · Chairman, Hendricks Holding Co Inc. · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and Maga Inc. | $443.7K |
| Organization · behind Article One PAC | $419.1K |
| Person · Director of Community Development, LAS Vegas Sands Corp. · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and CLF and 1 more | $386.3K |
| Organization · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and Maga Inc. | $361.3K |
| Organization · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and Maga Inc. | $314.9K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind HMP | $275.2K |
| Organization · behind Article One PAC | $251.4K |
| Person · Managing Director, Susquehanna International GRP · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and CLF and 1 more | $240K |
| Person · Executive, IJS Investments LLC · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and Maga Inc. | $192.3K |
| Organization · behind NO Going Back PAC Inc. and Maga Inc. | $184.9K |
Read for the 18 largest groups of 24, 97% of the $11M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $79,260 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $6,315,274
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,672 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
125 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $361,215 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 7 payments · 41% of all spending | $2,616,351 |
| 7 payments · 8% of all spending | $512,500 |
| 2 payments · 6.3% of all spending | $402,750 |
| 5 payments · 6.1% of all spending | $392,762 |
| 22 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $237,072 |
| 13 payments · 3.5% of all spending | $221,151 |
| 122 payments · 3.1% of all spending | $196,999 |
| 42 payments · 3% of all spending | $194,801 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,814 contributions · 21% of ranked | $1,023,825 |
| 422 contributions · 7.9% of ranked | $378,322 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 298 contributions · 6.8% of ranked | $326,629 |
| 253 contributions · 6.1% of ranked | $292,993 |
| 114 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $202,753 |
| 91 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $186,752 |
| 97 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $160,493 |
| 91 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $154,100 |
A further $58,082 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($312,726) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.