Oil, gas & coalOil, gas and coal companies and pipelines, with their PACs and trade groups.Business › EnergyPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACTrade associationWashington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Interstate Natural Gas Association of America
The Interstate Natural Gas Association of America lobbied on 8 issues. See lobbying
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$118.5K to 49 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $118,500
Republican 63%
Democratic 19%
Other or unresolved 18%
Support by the party of the candidate
Party of the candidate
Candidates
Direct
Independent
Amount
Share
Republican
32
$75,000
$0
$75,000
63%
Democratic
9
$22,000
$0
$22,000
19%
Other or unresolved
8
$21,500
$0
$21,500
18%
Shown support
49
$118,500
$0
$118,500
100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$164,000 in 90 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
9
$22K · 13%
Republican candidates
31
$74K · 45%
Other or unresolved candidates
9
$22.5K · 14%
Other PACs and committees
14
$45.5K · 28%
All recipients
63
$164K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
Ohio
4
$13K
North Carolina
3
$8.5K
Texas
3
$8.5K
Colorado
3
$8K
West Virginia
2
$7.5K
Arkansas
2
$6K
Louisiana
2
$6K
California
5
$6K
The largest 8 of 29 states.
Recipients 63
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Robert Edward Latta3 receipts, latest Jul 13, 2026Latta for Congress · H8OH05036$7.5K
S. Brett Brett Guthrie2 receipts, latest May 29, 2026Guthrie for Congress · H8KY02031$5.5K
Martin Heinrich1 receipt, latest Jul 13, 2026Martin Heinrich for Senate · S2NM00088$5K
Bruce Westerman2 receipts, latest Jun 1, 2026Westerman for Congress · H4AR04048$5K
David Rouzer2 receipts, latest Jun 30, 2026David Rouzer for Congress · H2NC07096$5K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$39,23625%
Largest donors
Amy Andryszak Campbell21 contributions, latest Sep 30, 2026 · PRESIDENT AND CEO · INGAA · WASHINGTON, DC$8,736
Khary Cauthen2 contributions, latest Apr 1, 2026 · VP, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS · CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. · WASHINGTON, DC$6,500
Michael McMahon2 contributions, latest Mar 20, 2026 · SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL · BOARDWALK PIPELINE PARTNERS · SUGAR LAND, TX$5,000
Robert John Mosher2 contributions, latest Feb 17, 2026 · VICE PRESIDENT, GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS · INGAA · WASHINGTON, DC$5,000
Mark Bering2 contributions, latest Mar 20, 2026 · PRESIDENT · MILLENNIUM PIPELINE COMPANY · GROSSE POINTE SHORES, MI$3,000
Albert GirgisOne contribution on Apr 15, 2026 · HEAD OF GROWTH, MIDSTREAM · EQT CORPORATION · HOUSTON, TX$2,500
Rob JohnsonOne contribution on Apr 21, 2026 · PRESIDENT · WBI ENERGY, INC. · BISMARK, ND$2,500
Christopher SchindlerOne contribution on Feb 23, 2026 · VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL, CCO · SOUTHERN STAR CENTRAL GAS PIPE · STERLING, VA$2,500
Georgia B. CarterOne contribution on Feb 28, 2025 · VICE PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL · MILLENIUM PIPELINE COMPANY LLC · HENRICO, VA$1,000
Scott RupffOne contribution on Apr 21, 2026 · PRESIDENT · IROQUOIS PIPELINE OPERATING CO · SHELTON, CT$1,000
Paul RuppertOne contribution on Apr 29, 2026 · PRESIDENT · BHE GT&S · GLENN ALLEN, VA$1,000
Melissa MitchellOne contribution on Feb 17, 2026 · DIRECTOR, REGULATORY POLICY · INGAA · WASHINGTON, DC$500
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 36 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $39.2K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Refunds and rebatesMoney coming back to the committee: rebates and refunds of what it spent, contributions it made that were returned, and loans it made that were repaid.$3,5002.3%
Other receiptsInterest, dividends and other income the committee files on a line of its own.$9<0.1%
Total reported receipts $155,245
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $155.2K followed back through up to 3 committees
68% to named individuals, 32% not itemized.
Gave directly$42.2K 27%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Amy Andryszak CampbellPerson · President and CEO, Ingaa · Washington, DC · 5.6%
$8,736
Khary CauthenPerson · VP, Federal Government Affairs, Cheniere Energy, Inc. · Washington, DC · 4.2%
$6,500
Michael McMahonPerson · Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Boardwalk Pipeline Partners · Sugar Land, TX · 3.2%
$5,000
Robert John MosherPerson · Vice President, Government Affairs, Ingaa · Washington, DC · 3.2%
$5,000
Not itemized by this committee2.3%
$3,509
Mark BeringPerson · President, Millennium Pipeline Co. · Grosse Pointe Shores, MI · 1.9%
$3,000
Albert GirgisPerson · Head of Growth, Midstream, EQT Corp. · Houston, TX · 1.6%
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $39,236 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $829
$829+
$3.3K+
$7.5K+
$13.3K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
District of Columbia26 contributions · 53%
$20,736
Texas3 contributions · 19%
$7,500
Virginia3 contributions · 11%
$4,500
Michigan2 contributions · 7.6%
$3,000
North Dakota1 contribution · 6.4%
$2,500
Connecticut1 contribution · 2.5%
$1,000
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $167,680 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Contributions to candidates and other committeesMoney given to federal candidates, party committees and other PACs.$167,50099.9%
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$1800.1%
Total reported disbursements $167,680
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $164,000 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$164,000100%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$164,000
Paid to
New Democrat Coalition Action Fund$10,000
Lobo PAC$10,000
Latta for Congress$7,500
Lead Encourage Elect PAC$6,000
Guthrie for Congress$5,500
Common Values PAC$5,000
Total itemized disbursements $164,000
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 90 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
$167.7K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $22K, September 2025.
$167.7K
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
What The Interstate Natural Gas Association of America lobbies on 2026 reports
Besides giving through its PAC, The Interstate Natural Gas Association of America pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Spent on lobbying in 2026
$868K
Quarterly reports read
11
Bills it named
22
Topics it lobbied on
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Energy/Nuclearin 9 report entries · 6 bills named
In its own words
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, provisions relating to natural gas infrastructure permitting and ratemaking.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, provisions relating to the new natural gas certificate and greenhouse gas policy statements (Docket No. PL 18-1 & Docket No. PL 21-3).
H.R. 1, One Big Beautiful Bill Act (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline infrastructure sector).
H.R. 3061, Promoting Cross-Border Energy Infrastructure Act (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
H.R. 3668, Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
H.R. 1949, Unlocking our Domestic LNG Potential Act of 2025 (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
S. 5653, Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026 (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
Pipeline safety and security bills;
PHMSA reauthorization regulations and actions related to the natural gas pipeline industry;
Nationwide permit issues and regulations;
Bills and regulations related to the Natural Gas Act;
EPA Clean Water Act and Clean Air Act regulations and actions.
Issues important to the Natural Gas Industry. Monitor permitting reform, Pipeline Safety reauthorization. S. 2975 - Pipeline Safety Act of 2025.
Issues important to the Natural Gas Industry including: permitting reform; Pipeline Safety reauthorization; S. 2975 Pipeline Safety Act of 2025
Environment/Superfundin 9 report entries · 7 bills named
In its own words
Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emissions Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources Review (EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0317).
Implementation Plan for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (EPA-HQ-OAR-2021-0668;
FRL 8670-02-OAR).
Request for Information - Inflation Reduction Act Provisions for the Office of Air and Radiation Implementation (EPA-HQ-OAR-2022-0875;
EPA-HQ-OAR-2022-0878).
Federal policy relating to the role of natural gas infrastructure in achieving sustainability goals, including measures to lessen methane intensity and promote innovation and investment.
H.R. 4776, Standardizing Permitting and Expediting Economic Development (SPEED) Act (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
H.R. 1, One Big Beautiful Bill Act (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
H.R. 161, New Source Review (NSR) Permitting Improvement Act (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
H.R. 4218, Clean Air and Economic Advancement Reform Act (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
H.R. 6398, Reducing and Eliminating Duplicative Environmental Regulations Act (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
H.R. 6409, Foreign Emissions and Nonattainment Clarification for Economic Stability Act (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
Clean Air and Water (quality)in 6 report entries · 3 bills named
In its own words
Federal policy relating to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (P.L. 92-500).
H.R. 3898, Promoting Efficient Review for Modern Infrastructure Today (PERMIT) Act (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
H.R. 1, One Big Beautiful Bill Act (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
S. 5653, Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026 (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
EPA Clean Water Act and Clean Air Act regulations and actions.
Homeland Securityin 6 report entries · 6 bills named
In its own words
Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Enhancing Surface Cyber Risk Management (TSA-2022-0001).
H.R. 4213, Fiscal Year 2026 Homeland Security Appropriations Act (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline infrastructure sector).
Discussion draft realting to Transportation Security Administration (TSA) reauthorization (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
H.R. 5079, Widespread Information Management for the Welfare of Infrastructure and Government Act (provisions relating to the interstate nautral gas pipeline sector).
H.R. 5061, Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
H.R. 5371, Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2026 (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
S. 2983, Extending Expired Cybersecurity Authorities Act (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
H.R. 8800, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
Lobbied generally on critical infrastructure cybersecurity issues.
Pipeline safety and security bills; PHMSA reauthorization and actions related to the natural gas pipeline industry; Bills and regulations related to the Natural Gas Act.
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SENATE
Transportationin 3 report entries · 5 bills named
In its own words
Federal policy relating to 2023 reauthorization of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).
H.R. 5301, Promoting Innovation in Pipeline Efficiency and Safety (PIPES) Act of 2025 (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
S. 2975, Pipeline Integrity, Protection, and Enhancement for Leveraging Investments in the Nation's Energy to assure Safety (PIPELINE Safety) Act of 2025 (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
H.R. 9338, Pipeline Safety Authorization Act of 2026 (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
H.R. 7655, Pipeline Safety, Modernization, and Expansion Act of 2024 (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
H.R. 2613, Next Generation Pipelines Research and Development Act (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
Class Location Change Requirements (RIN 2137-AF29).
Amendments to Parts 192 and 195 to require Valve installation and Minimum Rupture Detection Standards (RIN 2137-AF06).
Safety of Gas Transmission Pipelines, Repair Criteria, Integrity Management Improvements, Cathodic Protection, Management of Change, and Other Related Amendments (RIN 2137-AF39).
Pipeline Safety Authorization Act of 2026 (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
Agriculturein 1 report entry
In its own words
Agriculture Foreign Investment Disclosure Act.
Offices it contacted
Agriculture, Dept of (USDA)
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SENATE
Who did the lobbying
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Interstate Natural Gas Association of AmericaIts own staff · 3 reports$868K
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $115.3K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Byron Donalds$13K
Banks for Senate$7K
Mike Rogers$7K
Banks PAC$5K
Jim Jordan$5K
Sen. Mike Crapo$5K
Tom Cotton$5K
Julia Letlow$4.5K
John Moolenaar$3.5K
Lindsey Graham$3.5K
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “THE INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA”, found by searching “INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Nov 9, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
INTERSTATE NATURAL GAS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
Filings covered
Through Oct 14, 2026
Data source
FEC bulk filing data
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names Interstate Natural Gas Association of America as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
BGBrett GuthrieRepublican · U.S. House · KY-02 · via Guthrie For Congress2 payments, latest May 29, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, May 29, 2026$5.5K
DRDavid RouzerRepublican · U.S. House · NC-07 · via David Rouzer For Congress2 payments, latest Jun 30, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Jun 30, 2026$5K
RLRick LarsenDemocratic · U.S. House · WA-02 · via Citizens To Elect Rick Larsen2 payments, latest Aug 31, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Aug 31, 2026$5K
$164K across 65 recipient committees, or 98% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
$2,500
Rob JohnsonPerson · President, WBI Energy, Inc. · Bismark, ND · 1.6%
$2,500
Christopher SchindlerPerson · Vice President, General Counsel, CCO, Southern Star Central Gas Pipe · Sterling, VA · 1.6%
$2,500
Georgia B. CarterPerson · Vice President and General Counsel, Millenium Pipeline Co. LLC · Henrico, VA · 0.6%
$1,000
Show 2 more sources
Gave directly, more
Name
Amount
Scott RupffPerson · President, Iroquois Pipeline Operating Co · Shelton, CT · 0.6%
$1,000
Paul RuppertPerson · President, BHE GT&S · Glenn Allen, VA · 0.6%
$1,000
Through DT Midstream Holdings, LLC PACOil, gas & coal$7.9K 5.1%
Through DT Midstream Holdings, LLC PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by DT Midstream Holdings, LLC PAC1.4%
$2,178
Jeffrey A. JewellPerson · Chief Financial Officer, DT Midstream · Detroit, MI · 0.9%
$1,472
Wendy EllisPerson · General Counsel & Corporate Secretary, DT Midstream · Detroit, MI · 0.8%
$1,232
Katherine A. PanczakPerson · Vice President, Business Development, DT Midstream · Detroit, MI · 0.7%
$1,095
Garrett J. MehlPerson · Vice President, Northern Region, DT Midstream · Detroit, MI · 0.6%
$986
Kenneth D. MagyarPerson · Vice President, Business Development N, DT Midstream · Detroit, MI · 0.6%
$980
Through Williams Companies, Inc. PAC, theOil, gas & coal$7.5K 4.8%
Through Williams Companies, Inc. PAC, the
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Williams Companies, Inc. PAC, the4.8%
$7,451
Through National Fuel Gas Co. Federal PACUtilities$6K 3.9%
Through National Fuel Gas Co. Federal PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by National Fuel Gas Co. Federal PAC3.9%
$6,029
Through Berkshire Hathaway Energy Co. PACUtilities (proposed)$5.7K 3.7%
Through Berkshire Hathaway Energy Co. PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Berkshire Hathaway Energy Co. PAC3.7%
$5,698
Through Transcanada USA Services, Inc. PACOil, gas & coal (proposed)$5.5K 3.5%
Through Transcanada USA Services, Inc. PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Transcanada USA Services, Inc. PAC3.5%
$5,451
Through Spire Inc. Federal PACUtilities (proposed)$3.8K 2.5%
Through Spire Inc. Federal PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Spire Inc. Federal PAC1.9%
$3,004
Joseph B. HamptonPerson · SVP & President Southeast, Spire Services Inc · Pelham, AL · 0.5%
$810
Through Sempra Energy Employees PACUtilities (proposed)$2.9K 1.9%
Through Sempra Energy Employees PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Sempra Energy Employees PAC1.9%
$2,934
Through PG&E Corp. Employees EnergypacUtilities$2.6K 1.7%
Through PG&E Corp. Employees Energypac
Name
Amount
Not itemized by PG&E Corp. Employees Energypac1.7%
$2,609
Through Enbridge Inc. PACOil, gas & coal (proposed)$2.6K 1.7%
Through Enbridge Inc. PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Enbridge Inc. PAC1.7%
$2,578
Through Southern Co. Gas PAC, Inc.Utilities (proposed)$2.2K 1.4%
Through Southern Co. Gas PAC, Inc.
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Southern Co. Gas PAC, Inc.1.4%
$2,230
Through Nextera Energy, Inc. PACUtilities$2.1K 1.3%
Through Nextera Energy, Inc. PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Nextera Energy, Inc. PAC1.3%
$2,094
Through UGI Corp. PACUtilities (proposed)$1.6K 1%
Through UGI Corp. PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by UGI Corp. PAC1%
$1,602
Through MDU Resources Group Good Government FundUtilities$1.1K 0.7%
Through MDU Resources Group Good Government Fund
Name
Amount
Not itemized by MDU Resources Group Good Government Fund0.7%
$1,148
677 smaller sources, $61.4K in all (40%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Ingaa24 contributions · 36% of ranked
$14,236
Cheniere Energy INC2 contributions · 17% of ranked
$6,500
Boardwalk Pipeline Partners2 contributions · 13% of ranked
$5,000
Millennium Pipeline Company2 contributions · 7.6% of ranked
$3,000
EQT Corporation1 contribution · 6.4% of ranked
$2,500
Southern Star Central GAS Pipe1 contribution · 6.4% of ranked
$2,500
WBI Energy INC1 contribution · 6.4% of ranked
$2,500
BHE GT&S1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked
$1,000
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
President And CEO21 contributions · 22% of ranked
$8,736
President5 contributions · 19% of ranked
$7,500
VP Federal Government Affairs2 contributions · 17% of ranked
$6,500
Senior Vice President General Counsel2 contributions · 13% of ranked
$5,000
Vice President Government Affairs2 contributions · 13% of ranked
$5,000
Head Of Growth Midstream1 contribution · 6.4% of ranked
$2,500
Vice President General Counsel CCO1 contribution · 6.4% of ranked
$2,500
Vice President And General Counsel1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked
$1,000
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
S. 5653, Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026 (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
Federal policy relating to the role of natural gas infrastructure in achieving climate goals, including measures to promote innovation and investment in hydrogen, renewable natural gas and carbon capture, utilization, and storage.
Federal policy relating to reducing methane emissions.
H.R. 161, H.R. 161, New Source Review (NSR) Permitting Improvement Act (provisions relating to the interstate natural gas pipeline sector).
Issues related to the use of Nationwide Permits for the natural gas industry; EPA Regulations generally.
Monitor environmental regulation important to the natural gas industry.