This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$394,500 in 10 payments
That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic party committees
1
$205K · 52%
Other party committees
1
$190K · 48%
All recipients
2
$395K
By the candidate’s state
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $205K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
$535K across 7 recipient committees, or 23% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 2 are shown. A further $300 was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $2,625,476 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$1,536,82559%
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$908,38835%
The Tulalip Tribes of Washington2 contributions, latest Apr 20, 2026 · Organization · TULALIP, WA$7,000
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,930 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $946.6K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$137,4995.2%
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$42,5241.6%
Other receiptsInterest, dividends and other income the committee files on a line of its own.$241<0.1%
Total reported receipts $2,625,476
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $2.6M followed back through up to 3 committees
32% to named individuals, 1% to organizations, 0.7% to committees we could not follow, 63% not itemized.
Gave directly$845.1K 32%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Not itemized by this committee32%
$845,060
12718 smaller sources, $1.7M in all (64%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $945,006 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $25.1K
$25.1K+
$100.4K+
$225.9K+
$401.5K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Washington1,615 contributions · 66%
$627,364
California53 contributions · 7.7%
$72,446
District of Columbia84 contributions · 6.5%
$61,043
Texas14 contributions · 3.4%
$32,400
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $2,335,437 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$1,754,01075%
Paid to
Brooke Davis Consulting, Inc.22 payments · latest Oct 1, 2026 · STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICES$262,000
Semiahmoo Resort13 payments · latest Oct 1, 2026 · MEALS$167,403
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$571,18824%
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$10,2390.4%
Total reported disbursements $2,335,437
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the earmarked money was headed $25.9K named
A conduit collects money that is legally someone else’s: the donor picks the recipient, and the conduit passes it on. The recipient is named in the filing’s memo line with its FEC committee id, so each row below is matched on that id rather than on the committee name the filer typed.
$25.9K across 36 receipts that named a destination, out of the 1,930 largest read. Receipts filed without a committee id in the memo are not counted here.
What the payments were for $2,282,296 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$607,20327%
Filed as
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING SERVICES
Spending over time
$2.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $468.6K, Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026.
$2.3M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Audit reports
1
Audit findings
2000 cycleReport released Jun 14, 2002
DisclosureFailure to Itemize Expenditures · Failure to Itemize Receipts
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Nov 8, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
LobbyingWhat does its sponsor lobby on?
No lobbying disclosures matched
No Lobbying Disclosure Act filings were matched to this committee. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Citizens to Elect Rick Larsen is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a House campaign committee. It is a principal campaign committee. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
Virginia34 contributions · 3%
$28,150
Maryland36 contributions · 2.9%
$27,517
Florida13 contributions · 1.7%
$16,225
Illinois10 contributions · 1.1%
$10,000
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 101 contributions · 8.5% of ranked
$44,843
Cedar Grove Systems5 contributions · 2.7% of ranked
$14,000
Microsoft12 contributions · 2.6% of ranked
$13,673
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 10 contributions · 2.4% of ranked
$12,623
Anthos Capital2 contributions · 2% of ranked
$10,351
Seacast INC6 contributions · 1.6% of ranked
$8,657
Accelerate Strategies4 contributions · 1.6% of ranked
$8,500
Penn Avenue Partners11 contributions · 1.5% of ranked
$8,000
A further $299,921 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($137,499) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 897 contributions · 31% of ranked
$281,664
Consultant79 contributions · 6.7% of ranked
$61,104
Attorney73 contributions · 5.6% of ranked
$50,991
CEO57 contributions · 5.6% of ranked
$50,537
President40 contributions · 3.8% of ranked
$34,942
Executive21 contributions · 3.1% of ranked
$27,842
Owner28 contributions · 2.1% of ranked
$19,317
Chairman9 contributions · 2% of ranked
$18,500
A further $24,700 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($137,499) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Not broken out by the committeeReported as a lump sum, with memo entries pointed to for the detail. Where those entries were filed and read, this page counts the payees they name instead; what is left here was never itemised.$5,9130.3%
Filed as
REIMBURSEMENT - SEE BELOW$5,861
CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - SEE BELOW$52
Paid to
Davis, Brooke N$2,661
Larsen, Rick$1,456
Davidson, Alex$1,007
Frahs, Jessica$347
Bowditch, Elizabeth$237
Davis, Brooke$154
Field and canvassingDoor-to-door canvassing, phone banks and calls to voters, petition and signature gathering, and get-out-the-vote work.$1,512<0.1%
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,094 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
124 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $176,868 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Premier Fiorello Consulting20 payments · 5.1% of all spending
$120,000
Estep, Andrew35 payments · 4.3% of all spending
$100,336
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.