Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
ConstructionBuilding and heavy-construction contractors, engineering and design firms, and their associations. Home builders are under Real estate.BusinessPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACCorporationOmaha, NebraskaActive
Connected organization: HDR, Inc.
Political fund of HDR, Inc.
HDR, Inc. is an American design and engineering company based in Omaha, Nebraska. (Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00103903 · files monthly
“HDR is a 100% employee-owned, global professional services firm specializing in architecture, engineering, environmental and construction services.”
HDR, Inc., the organization this committee is the political fund of, hdrinc.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 54 | $215,000 | $0 | $215,000 | 55% |
| Democratic | 25 | $108,000 | $0 | $108,000 | 27% |
| Other or unresolved | 19 | $71,250 | $0 | $71,250 | 18% |
| Shown support | 98 | $394,250 | $0 | $394,250 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 25 | $108K · 14% |
| Republican candidates | 54 | $215K · 27% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 20 | $81.3K · 10% |
| Democratic party committees | 1 | $5.5K · 0.7% |
| Other party committees | 3 | $135K · 17% |
| Other PACs and committees | 47 | $252.6K · 32% |
| All recipients | 150 | $797.4K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 14 | $64.5K |
| Nebraska | 7 | $54.5K |
| Texas | 5 | $18.5K |
| Illinois | 7 | $18.5K |
| New York | 4 | $18K |
| South Dakota | 3 | $17.5K |
| Kansas | 3 | $16.5K |
| Florida |
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
$5K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLORADO SENATE VICTORY 2016 · 2 payments | $60K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $60K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $20K |
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 14,793 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $1,605,141
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,935 contributions · 15% | $157,361 |
| 2,066 contributions · 15% | $152,456 |
| 1,230 contributions · 7.7% |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $1,565,820
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$1.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $150.9K, February 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
HDR, Inc. is an American design and engineering company based in Omaha, Nebraska. Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
HDR, Inc. Employee Owners PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| 4 |
| $15.5K |
The largest 8 of 35 states.
Bars drawn to $60K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $20K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $20K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 1 payment | $15K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BRITT · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to FISCHER · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PADILLA · 2 payments | $10K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to FREE STATE PAC · 2 payments | $10K |
From the 157 largest of 158 recipient committees: $797.4K, or 51% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $80,803 |
| 1,045 contributions · 7.3% | $76,928 |
| 625 contributions · 4.4% | $46,200 |
| 677 contributions · 4.1% | $42,611 |
| 545 contributions · 3.5% | $36,330 |
| 514 contributions · 3.4% | $35,795 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10,664 contributions · 71% of ranked | $741,356 |
| 1,086 contributions · 8% of ranked | $83,915 |
| 1,184 contributions · 8% of ranked | $83,877 |
| 609 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $40,203 |
| 475 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $33,322 |
| 178 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $25,987 |
| 191 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $14,915 |
| 174 contributions · 1% of ranked | $10,323 |
A further $2,184 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($525,968) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 158 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $20,325 |
| 339 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $17,949 |
| 244 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $15,715 |
| 185 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $12,525 |
| 131 contributions · 2% of ranked | $11,390 |
| 93 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $10,550 |
| 22 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $8,226 |
| 78 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $6,840 |
A further $2,184 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($525,968) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $1,543,246
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 594 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 9 payments · 5.4% of all spending | $85,000 |
| 2 payments · 3.8% of all spending | $60,000 |
| 2 payments · 3.8% of all spending | $60,000 |
| 7 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $43,000 |
| 3 payments · 2% of all spending | $30,800 |
| 2 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $20,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $20,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $20,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 309 payments totaling $765.6K.