Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › NE-02 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, NE-02
Has not served in Congress
2 priorities from brinkerharding.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
- Grow our economy, increase wages, and keep inflation in check
- Pass year-round E-15 to help lower gas prices and support Nebraska agriculture
- Take on Big Pharma and Big Insurance to guarantee Americans pay the same low prices for prescription drugs as other developed countries
- Protect critical programs like Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare for single moms, veterans, the elderly, and disabled – NOT illegal immigrants or able-bodied adults
- Make healthcare, including IVF, more accessible and affordable for Nebraska families
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · brinkerharding.com/vision
Heading as listed on brinkerharding.com ↗ (opens brinkerharding.com at this heading)
- Support term limits, ban congressional stock trading, and halt congressional salaries during government shutdowns
- Promote body cameras and identifiable uniforms for ICE agents like we do with the Omaha Police
- Deport criminal illegal immigrants who commit violent crimes
- Pass nationwide Voter ID to ensure only American citizens can vote
- Stand up to career politicians, crack down on waste and fraud, and make government truly accountable to the people
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · brinkerharding.com/vision
Heading as listed on brinkerharding.com ↗ (opens brinkerharding.com at this heading)
FEC filings, Jul 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00909515
89¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 7 reports ($2.4M of $2.7M). Cash on hand went from $437.8K on Sep 30, 2025 to $291.2K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $561,528 | $123,698 | $437,830 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $315,401 | $209,235 | $543,996 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $359,186 | $166,010 | $737,172 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 22, 2026 | $34,304 | $122,790 | $648,686 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $621,353 | $221,417 | $1,048,623 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $625,436 | $1,093,644 | $580,414 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $190,755 | $479,942 | $291,227 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
36 endorsers listed on Brinker Harding’s own campaign site: 35 officials, 1 person.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
U.S. Senator
U.S. Senator
Congressman
Congressman
Congressman
Governor
Fmr. Governor
Fmr. Rep. and Mayor
Fmr. Omaha Police Officers Assoc. President
Advanced · 37,020 votes (100%) · 1 of 1 · Full results ↗
Lost · 103,494 votes (41%) · 2 of 3 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · SurveyUSA, Sep 13, 2026 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,930 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.5M.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 6 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 21 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $617K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 169 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $521.3K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $2,850,577
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
82% of the money placed by state came from inside Nebraska: $1.3M of $1.5M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 814 contributions · 82% | $1,270,145 |
| 331 contributions · 4.2% | $64,448 |
| 17 contributions · 2.4% | $36,500 |
| 288 contributions · 2.1% | $32,355 |
| 10 contributions · 1.4% | $22,000 |
| 6 contributions · 0.9% | $14,500 |
| 12 contributions · 0.8% | $11,951 |
| 4 contributions · 0.6% | $10,000 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 34 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,193 contributions · 28% of ranked | $371,267 |
| Written instead of an employer · 28 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $43,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 8 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $31,400 |
| 8 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $28,000 |
| 6 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $24,500 |
| 4 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1% of ranked | $13,500 |
A further $102,200 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($90,817) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Harding’s campaign or spending on ads about Harding are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 26% to named individuals, 30% to organizations, 20% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 23% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind HMP | $470.1K |
| Organization · behind New Democrat Majority and Bold America and 1 more | $404K |
| Organization · behind Lead Left PAC | $366.8K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind CLF | $351.9K |
| Person · Investor, Self Employed · behind Fight for Nebraska PAC and EDW Action Fund and 1 more | $321.1K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Fight for Nebraska PAC | $267.5K |
| Organization · behind Fight for Nebraska PAC | $256.7K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind New Democrat Majority | $245.9K |
| Person · Investment Counselor, Cohen Klingenstein LLC · behind Civic Renewal Fund Inc. | $170.5K |
| Organization · behind Civic Renewal Fund Inc. | $170.5K |
| Person · CEO, Space Exploration Technologies Corp. · behind CLF and NO Going Back PAC Inc. | $166.1K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Cffe PAC and HMP | $158.6K |
Read for the 19 largest groups of 43, 96% of the $10.3M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $17,000 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $2,401,476
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 458 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
16 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $71,030 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 6 payments · 47% of all spending | $1,198,732 |
| 18 payments · 10% of all spending | $264,200 |
| 24 payments · 7.3% of all spending | $184,449 |
| 3 payments · 3.8% of all spending | $96,500 |
| 15 payments · 3.1% of all spending | $78,851 |
| 20 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $57,277 |
| 10 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $48,180 |
| 10 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $39,900 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,191 contributions · 26% of ranked | $369,267 |
| 51 contributions · 7.5% of ranked | $108,200 |
| 49 contributions · 7.1% of ranked | $102,200 |
| 62 contributions · 7% of ranked | $101,750 |
| 67 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $74,018 |
| 20 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $35,999 |
| 17 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $33,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 8 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $31,400 |
A further $101,450 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($90,817) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.