Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › Illinois U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
I Independent nominee for U.S. Senate, Illinois
Has not served in Congress
No campaign site or public profiles are attached to this record yet.
Whitfield Harrington Jr.’s words are not shown
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00931428
86¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 4 reports ($123.9K of $143.4K). Cash on hand went from $24K on Mar 31, 2026 to $19.5K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $31,662 | $7,627 | $24,036 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $69,040 | $89,324 | $3,751 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $37,247 | $18,700 | $22,299 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $5,432 | $8,247 | $19,484 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 124 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $41.7K.
Total reported receipts $143,382
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
7.9% of the money placed by state came from inside Illinois: $3.3K of $41.7K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5 contributions · 28% | $11,600 |
| 17 contributions · 10% | $4,190 |
| 8 contributions · 9.8% | $4,100 |
| 10 contributions · 7.9% |
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 59% to named individuals, 37% to organizations, 0.8% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 0.9% to committees nothing more could be followed from, 1.6% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Governor of Illinois, State of Illinois · behind Illinois Future PAC | $9.6M |
| Organization · behind Fairshake and Protect Progress | $3.5M |
| Organization · behind Fairshake | $2M |
| Organization · behind Fairshake | $1.8M |
| Person · Philanthropist, Self Employed · behind Illinois Future PAC | $1M |
| Person · Partner, AH Capital Management · behind Fairshake |
The campaign also refunded $80 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 14% of all spending | $17,500 |
| 10 payments · 12% of all spending | $14,496 |
| 4 payments · 8.7% of all spending | $10,749 |
| 17 payments · 6.6% of all spending | $8,156 |
| 1 payment · 4.6% of all spending | $5,669 |
| 1 payment · 4% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 3 payments · 3.6% of all spending | $4,461 |
| 1 payment · 3.2% of all spending | $3,985 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Not read yet
Lost · 64,578 votes (1.6%) · 3 of 3 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
| $3,300 |
| 12 contributions · 5% | $2,090 |
| 5 contributions · 4.7% | $1,950 |
| 5 contributions · 4.3% | $1,800 |
| 12 contributions · 3.6% | $1,500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 22 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 27 contributions · 21% of ranked | $8,370 |
| 1 contribution · 8.7% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 8.7% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 8.7% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 8 contributions · 7.7% of ranked | $3,100 |
| 5 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $1,130 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $1,000 |
A further $1,600 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($24,926) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 27 contributions · 21% of ranked | $8,370 |
| 2 contributions · 11% of ranked | $4,500 |
| 1 contribution · 8.8% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 8.8% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 8 contributions · 7.8% of ranked | $3,100 |
| 5 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $1,130 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 4 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $1,000 |
A further $2,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($24,926) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| $860.8K |
| Person · Partner, AH Capital Management · behind Fairshake | $860.8K |
| Organization · behind Fairshake | $825.5K |
| Organization · behind Protect Progress | $424.5K |
| Person · Co-Founder and Managing Director, Westbridge Capital · behind The Impact Fund | $289.9K |
| Person · Business Owner, Chicago Cubs · behind Illinois Future PAC | $239.6K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Progressive Values Illinois and The Impact Fund | $143.4K |
Read for all 9 groups that spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
Total itemized disbursements $118,859
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 175 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.