Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › NY-13 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, NY-13
Has not served in Congress
2 priorities from jmw4congress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Robust vetting process to ensure legal status candidates align with American civic values and do not hold subverted or anarchist ideologies.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jmw4congress.com/page/2
Heading as listed on jmw4congress.com/page/2 ↗ (opens jmw4congress.com/page/2 at this heading)
Trigger data-driven local pauses when unemployment, housing shortages, or displacement of working-class citizens spike.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jmw4congress.com/page/2
Heading as listed on jmw4congress.com/page/2 ↗ (opens jmw4congress.com/page/2 at this heading)
Accept and pass community-driven addenda proposals by public quorum vote during district meetings.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jmw4congress.com/page/2
Heading as listed on jmw4congress.com/page/2 ↗ (opens jmw4congress.com/page/2 at this heading)
Honors the 58.6% (~59%) majority vote for Statehood in Puerto Rico’s self-determination referendum
➢ Guarantees equal constitutional rights, full U.S. citizenship, complete congressional representation, and sovereign debt resolution
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jmw4congress.com/page/2
Heading as listed on jmw4congress.com/page/2 ↗ (opens jmw4congress.com/page/2 at this heading)
Transition former U.S. TPS beneficiaries into compensated leadership roles in Haiti to lead local governance and infrastructure rebuilding.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jmw4congress.com/page/2
Heading as listed on jmw4congress.com/page/2 ↗ (opens jmw4congress.com/page/2 at this heading)
Bilateral U.S.–Haiti Development Fund focused on structural capacity-building, economic mobility, and energy infrastructure.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jmw4congress.com/page/2
Heading as listed on jmw4congress.com/page/2 ↗ (opens jmw4congress.com/page/2 at this heading)
Prosecute non-disclosure of transgender history or biological birth sex as sexual assault (aligned with UK & Israel standards)
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jmw4congress.com/page/2
Heading as listed on jmw4congress.com/page/2 ↗ (opens jmw4congress.com/page/2 at this heading)
Heading as listed on jmw4congress.com/page/2 ↗ (opens jmw4congress.com/page/2 at this heading)
83% Bipartisan National Support for Voter ID & Proof of Citizenship ↗ (opens jmw4congress.com/page/5 at this heading)
Opponents claim Voter ID laws cause disenfranchisement, but history proves otherwise. As part of our court filings, we presented an official copy of my grandmother’s historical NYC Voter ID card used over 50 years ago in New York City.
“If New York City successfully administered physical Voter IDs 50 years ago, there is no technical or legal reason why a far more technologically advanced state cannot issue secure Voter IDs today.”
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jmw4congress.com/page/5
Heading as listed on jmw4congress.com/page/5 ↗ (opens jmw4congress.com/page/5 at this heading) · “SAVE ACT & ELECTION INTEGRITY” on jmw4congress.com/page/5 ↗ (opens jmw4congress.com/page/5 at this heading)
Campaign committee · 2025–2026 · latest available filing · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00954800
No receipts reported
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 43% to named individuals, 27% to organizations, 6.2% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 3% to committees nothing more could be followed from, 21% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · behind Progressive Unity Fund | $997K |
| Organization · behind Bold America | $790.6K |
| Organization · behind Latino Victory Fund | $413.1K |
| Person · President, New Consensus · behind Justice Democrats PAC and Citizens Against AIPAC Corruption | $406.4K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Project 218 | $344.7K |
| Organization · behind Bold America |
No itemized payments
No endorsements page
Lost · 18,308 votes (11%) · 2 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
The FEC counts someone as a candidate once they raise or spend more than $5,000.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
| $307.2K |
| Organization · behind Bold America and Latino Victory Fund | $286.4K |
| Organization · behind Justice Democrats PAC | $179.8K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind Bold America | $176K |
| Person · CEO, Showcase Commerce Inc. · behind American Priorities | $171.5K |
| Person · Retired · behind American Priorities | $163.3K |
| Person · CEO, MEI Group · behind American Priorities | $151.1K |
Read for the 12 largest groups of 16, 97% of the $9.5M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.