Other political groupsClearly political, but nothing yet shows a cause or a side: not their own words, their funders or a published source.Political groupsPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
Why this committee exists In its own words
“We’re building a movement to save democracy and defeat authoritarianism. That work requires more than tactics—it requires shared values that guide how we show up, who we fight for, and what we’re building together.”
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Its site sums up what it stands for in the statement above, and publishes no list of positions beyond it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$495.6K to 42 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $495,638
Democratic 100%
Against candidates $60,048
Republican 52%Other or unresolved 26%Democratic 23%
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$94,435 in 19 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
9
$19.4K · 21%
Other PACs and committees
3
$75K · 79%
All recipients
12
$94.4K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
Washington
1
$10K
Minnesota
1
$2.1K
New York
2
$2.1K
Massachusetts
1
$1K
California
1
$1K
Tennessee
1
$1K
Hawaii
1
$1K
Georgia
1
$1K
Recipients 12
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $10,923,517 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$10,788,67899%
Where it came from
Wayne JordanOne contribution on Aug 6, 2026 · OAKLAND, CA$250,000
Hilary Perkins3 contributions, latest Aug 6, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · SAN RAFAEL, CA$106,000
Long Ridge Action Fund1 receipt, latest Jan 13, 2026 · San Francisco, California$100,000
ActBlue1 receipt, latest Dec 9, 2025 · West Somerville, Massachusetts$6,656
Indivisible NY1 receipt, latest Feb 11, 2025 · Washington, District of Columbia$273
The 14 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $296.5K from 6 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$91,9860.8%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$42,8530.4%
Total reported receipts $10,923,517
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $10.9M followed back through up to 3 committees
10% to named individuals, 1.8% to organizations, 0.9% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 87% not itemized.
Gave directly$10.2M 93%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Not itemized by this committee87%
$9,504,577
Wayne JordanPerson · Oakland, CA · 2.3%
$250,000
Hilary PerkinsPerson · San Rafael, CA · 1%
$106,000
Long Ridge Action FundOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 0.9%
$100,000
Movement Voter PacOrganization · 0.9%
$100,000
Stefania MallettPerson · Weston, MA · 0.7%
$77,500
John MirskyPerson · Ann Arbor, MI · 0.5%
$60,000
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $5,080,473 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $66K
$66K+
$263.8K+
$593.7K+
$1.1M+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California8,496 contributions · 32%
$1,649,031
Massachusetts2,454 contributions · 11%
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $6,114,115 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$5,604,35892%
Paid to
Indivisible Project3 payments · latest Dec 17, 2025 · NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - STAFF TIME PREIMBURSEMENT$2,500,000
Blue State Digital, Inc17 payments · latest Oct 13, 2026 · NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - DIGITAL AD CONSULTING$524,219
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $6,103,127 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$5,669,81293%
Filed as
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - STAFF TIME PREIMBURSEMENT$2,500,000
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - SOFTWARE$625,660
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - DIGITAL ADS$413,530
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - PROCESSING FEE$387,251
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - SMS MESSAGING$386,556
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - CONTRIBUTION$218,850
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - PAC MERCHANDISE
Spending over time
$6.1M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.2M, July 2025.
$6.1M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$206,314
September 2026$122,182
August 2026$454,366
July 2026$339,583
June 2026$319,243
May 2026$211,526
April 2026$156,596
March 2026$211,682
February 2026$122,399
January 2026$179,250
December 2025$880,657
November 2025$123,990
October 2025$145,705
September 2025$32,968
August 2025$67,590
July 2025$1,210,936
June 2025$118,337
May 2025$80,386
April 2025$109,274
March 2025$110,452
February 2025$80,725
January 2025$829,953
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “INDIVISIBLE ACTION” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Bars drawn to $40K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Pramila Jayapal2 receipts, latest May 18, 2026Pramila for Congress · H6WA07458$10K
Margaret Flanagan2 receipts, latest Aug 6, 2026Peggy Flanagan for Minnesota · S6MN00440$2.1K
Jarrett Keohokalole1 receipt, latest Jul 30, 2026Keohokalole for Hawaii · H6HI01311$1K
Patrick Thomas Roath1 receipt, latest Aug 13, 2026Friends of Patrick Roath · H6MA08307$1K
Randy Villegas1 receipt, latest May 7, 2026Villegas for Congress · H6CA22190$1K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Jasmine Clark for GeorgiaHouse campaign committee · Connected to DR. JASMINE CLARK SCIENCE VICTORY FUND · 1 payment
$1K
$94.4K across 15 recipient committees, or 1.5% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $1K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
46 smaller sources, $725.4K in all (6.6%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
$574,648
New York2,690 contributions · 6.3%
$317,816
Washington2,732 contributions · 5.2%
$264,894
Maryland1,220 contributions · 3.3%
$168,506
District of Columbia439 contributions · 2.9%
$149,340
Colorado1,178 contributions · 2.8%
$144,250
Illinois1,271 contributions · 2.7%
$137,505
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 18,693 contributions · 70% of ranked
$2,644,449
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 3,328 contributions · 11% of ranked
$425,045
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 578 contributions · 2.1% of ranked
$78,467
Therapy 200018 contributions · 1% of ranked
$36,000
University Of Pennsylvania16 contributions · 0.7% of ranked
$26,168
Google55 contributions · 0.5% of ranked
$17,995
Georgetown University5 contributions · 0.4% of ranked
$14,000
Netflix27 contributions · 0.3% of ranked
$12,125
A further $686,920 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($91,986) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 18,591 contributions · 62% of ranked
$2,565,832
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 1,217 contributions · 5.2% of ranked
$216,632
Physician630 contributions · 2.1% of ranked
$88,658
Engineer356 contributions · 1.5% of ranked
$61,122
Professor486 contributions · 1.3% of ranked
$53,458
Attorney478 contributions · 1.3% of ranked
$52,404
Software Engineer396 contributions · 1.2% of ranked
$51,080
Consultant398 contributions · 1.2% of ranked
$50,090
A further $609,030 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($91,986) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Julie GonzalesSupport · 12 records · latest Jul 20, 2026$46,020
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$288.4K of it was independent spending for Margaret Flanagan and for Julie Gonzales and 10 more$288,4234.7%
Filed as
Billboard (actual; see estimate on 10/7 48 hr report)Independent spending: $16.8K in support of Angela Nixon · $12.3K in support of Jamie Ager and 2 more$52,478
DIGITAL ADS - PREPAYMENT$46,617
Digital AdsIndependent spending: $15.5K in opposition to Joni K. Ernst · $15.5K in opposition to Dan Sullivan and 1 more$46,428
BillboardIndependent spending: $13.8K in support of Jasmine Clark · $12.8K in support of Aftyn Behn$26,574
Digital ads (Actual; estimate reported 8/7)Independent spending: $13.5K in support of Justin J. Pearson · $13K in support of Margaret Flanagan$26,500
Digital ads (actual; estimate reported 6/2)Independent spending in support of Randy Villegas$18,000
Digital ads (Actual; estimate reported 8/3)Independent spending in support of Margaret Flanagan$12,000
Digital ads (estimate)Independent spending in support of Patrick Thomas Roath$11,617
Digital ads (actual; estimate reported 6/27)Independent spending in support of Julie Gonzales$11,383
Billboard (Actual; estimate reported 8/17)Independent spending in support of Patrick Thomas Roath$10,000
Digital ads (actual; estimate reported 6/20)Independent spending in support of Darializa Avila Chevalier$10,000
Digital ads (actual; estimate reported 6/12)Independent spending in support of Julie Gonzales$10,000
Paid to
Good InfluenceIndependent spending: $31K in support of Margaret Flanagan · $28.3K in support of Julie Gonzales and 4 more$140,000
Lamar AdvertisingIndependent spending: $16.8K in support of Angela Nixon · $13.8K in support of Jasmine Clark and 4 more$100,172
Blue State DigitalIndependent spending: $15.5K in opposition to Joni K. Ernst · $15.5K in opposition to Dan Sullivan and 1 more$46,428
Blue State Digital, IncIndependent spending: $456 in support of Jasmine Clark · $456 in support of Brad Lander and 2 more$1,824
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$47.7K of it was independent spending for Brad Lander and against Adriano Espaillat and 1 more$50,6040.8%
Filed as
Posters (partial payment for IE reported 6.12.26)Independent spending: $13.6K in opposition to Adriano Espaillat · $13.6K in support of Darializa Avila Chevalier$27,240
Posters (partial payment for IE reported 6.11.26)Independent spending in support of Brad Lander$20,430
PREIMBURSEMENT; PODCAST PRODUCTION$2,365
PREIMBURSEMENT: PODCAST PRODUCTION$1,100
NON-CONTRIB ACCT - VOID MARCH 2025 PYMT; REISSUE NEXT PERIOD-$130
NON-CONTRIB ACCT - VOID NOV 2024 PYMT; REISSUE MARCH 2025-$400
Paid to
TaskforceIndependent spending: $20.4K in support of Brad Lander · $13.6K in opposition to Adriano Espaillat and 1 more$47,670
Indivisible Project$3,465
Thomas, Joan-$130
Davis, PAM-$400
Field and canvassingDoor-to-door canvassing, phone banks and calls to voters, petition and signature gathering, and get-out-the-vote work.$38.4K of it was independent spending for Aftyn Behn and for Julie Gonzales and 10 more$38,4680.6%
Filed as
Telephone CallsIndependent spending: $1.2K in support of James Talarico · $1K in support of Matt Dunlap and 4 more$7,938
PhonebankingIndependent spending in support of Aftyn Behn$6,870
Telephone Calls - actual (estimate on 9/20/26 report)Independent spending: $1.6K in support of Margaret Flanagan · $834 in support of Patrick Thomas Roath and 4 more$4,922
Phonebanking (actual; estimate reported 12/2/25)Independent spending in support of Aftyn Behn$3,277
Phonebanking (actual; estimate reported11.20.25)Independent spending in support of Aftyn Behn$2,044
Telephone Calls (actual; estimate reported 6/30/26)Independent spending in support of Julie Gonzales$1,587
Telephone Calls (actual; see IE reported 5.28.26)Independent spending in support of Randy Villegas$1,474
Telephone Calls (actual; see IE reported 5.19.26)Independent spending in support of Jasmine Clark$1,371
Telephone Calls (Actual; estimate reported 8/20)Independent spending: $458 in support of Donavan McKinney · $458 in support of Abdul El-Sayed$916
Telephone Calls - actual (estimate on 8/28/26 report)Independent spending in support of Patrick Thomas Roath$743
Telephone Calls - actual (estimate on 8/7/26 report)Independent spending in support of Justin J. Pearson$714
Telephone Calls (actual; estimate reported 6/24/26)Independent spending in support of Julie Gonzales$675
Paid to
Scale to WinIndependent spending: $12.2K in support of Aftyn Behn · $3.5K in support of Julie Gonzales and 4 more$38,468
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$31.4K of it was independent spending for Julie Gonzales and for Abdul El-Sayed and 9 more$31,3780.5%
Filed as
Text MessagesIndependent spending: $4K in support of Abdul El-Sayed · $3.9K in support of Margaret Flanagan and 4 more$10,092
Text Message (actual; estimate reported 6/10)Independent spending in support of Julie Gonzales$9,776
Text Message (actual; estimate reported 6/17)Independent spending: $2.9K in support of Brad Lander · $2.4K in support of Darializa Avila Chevalier$5,288
Text Message (actual; estimate reported 6/30)Independent spending in support of Julie Gonzales$3,981
Text Messages - payment for IE disseminated 4/20/26Independent spending in support of Jasmine Clark$782
Paid to
CivitechIndependent spending: $13.8K in support of Julie Gonzales · $4K in support of Abdul El-Sayed and 4 more$31,378
Refunds and redesignationsContributions returned to donors or reassigned to another election.$18,4760.3%
Filed as
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - REFUND$18,476
Paid to
Heenan, Jane$5,000
Harris, Jonathan$2,800
Muth, Catherine$1,150
Ragatz, Susan$1,010
Dunant, Mary Ann$1,000
Kopra, Andrew$1,000
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$5,338<0.1%
Filed as
PROCESSING FEE$4,008
SERVICE FEES$1,330
Paid to
ActBlue$5,338
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$627 of it was independent spending for Jasmine Clark$627<0.1%
Filed as
LiteratureIndependent spending in support of Jasmine Clark$627
Paid to
Clash GraphicsIndependent spending in support of Jasmine Clark$627
Total itemized disbursements $6,103,127
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 634 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
1 payment was reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $209 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Indivisible Project13 payments · 41% of all spending
$2,503,465
Blue State Digital, Inc21 payments · 8.6% of all spending
$526,042
Upland IX, LLC29 payments · 6.3% of all spending
$386,556
ActBlue147 payments · 6.2% of all spending
$379,615
NGP VAN, Inc25 payments · 4.7% of all spending
$288,510
The Movement Cooperative14 payments · 4.5% of all spending
$277,075
BUMPERACTIVE.COM25 payments · 3.5% of all spending
$214,436
Blue State Digital13 payments · 2.8% of all spending
$170,564
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Indivisible Project3 payments, latest Dec 17, 2025NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - STAFF TIME PREIMBURSEMENT$2.5M
Blue State Digital, Inc17 payments, latest Oct 13, 2026NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - DIGITAL AD CONSULTING$524.2K
