Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Electing women's & communities' candidatesGroups whose purpose is electing, or mobilizing voters for, candidates from a shared community: women, or Black, Latino, Asian American and Pacific Islander candidates, among others. The community has to be an identity people share, not an age bracket or a political stance.Causes
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
The Latino Victory Fund is the super PAC of the Latino Victory Project — a nonpartisan organization devoted to supporting Latino candidates and increasing turnout of Latino voters — and it plans to aggressively push back against candidates, nationally and locally, whose policies it believes will harm the Latino population. (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00562777 · files monthly
“The First Latinas program aims to increase Latina representation at all government levels...”
Latino Victory Fund, on its own site, firstlatinas.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 35 | $65K · 62% |
| Democratic party committees | 1 | $5K · 4.8% |
| Other PACs and committees | 5 | $35K · 33% |
| All recipients | 41 | $105K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 5 | $11K |
| New Jersey | 3 | $10.5K |
| Arizona | 2 | $10K |
| Texas | 8 | $9.5K |
| Nebraska | 1 | $5K |
| Florida | 4 | $4K |
| New Mexico | 3 | $3K |
| New York | 3 | $3K |
The largest 8 of 14 states.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $3M from 24 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
The 3 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $3,570,391
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
12% to named individuals, 84% to organizations, 4.2% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · 56% | $2,000,000 |
| Organization · 14% | $500,000 |
| 3.9% | $137,960 |
| Organization · 3.6% | $130,000 |
| Organization · 2.8% | $100,000 |
| Person · West Palm Beach, FL · 1.6% | $58,333 |
| Organization · 1.4% | $50,000 |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 13 contributions · 73% | $2,570,788 |
| 38 contributions · 7.5% | $265,083 |
| 157 contributions · 7.1% | $250,843 |
| 54 contributions · 6.7% | $236,500 |
| 5 contributions · 2% | $71,916 |
| 1 contribution · 1.1% |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $3,614,994
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$3.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $2.3M, June 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending.
No lobbying disclosures matched
The Latino Victory Fund is the super PAC of the Latino Victory Project — a nonpartisan organization devoted to supporting Latino candidates and increasing turnout of Latino voters — and it plans to aggressively push back against candidates, nationally and locally, whose policies it believes will harm the Latino population. Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Latino Victory Fund is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $25K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC. · 4 payments | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND THE VOTE LEADERSHIP FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $250 |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $250 |
$15.5K from 4 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $25K |
| House campaign committee · 4 payments | $7.5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE STATE PARTY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to JFW CHALLENGERS · 2 payments | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 2 payments | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CALIFORNIA HOUSE MAJORITY FUND · 2 payments | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments |
$105K across 36 recipient committees, or 2.9% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| Organization · 1.4% |
| $50,000 |
| Organization · 1.1% | $40,000 |
| Person · CIO, Garcia Hamilton & Associates · Houston, TX · 1% | $35,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Attorney, Angel Reyes & Associates PC · Dallas, TX · 0.8% | $30,000 |
| Person · Sessa Capital · New York, NY · 0.8% | $29,000 |
| Organization · 0.7% | $25,000 |
| Organization · 0.7% | $25,000 |
| Person · Government Affairs Consultant, EK, Sunkin, & BAI · Pasadena, CA · 0.7% | $25,000 |
| Person · Attorney, Regina T. Montoya PLLC · Dallas, TX · 0.6% | $21,043 |
| Organization · 0.6% | $20,000 |
| Person · Executive, Airman Services, Inc. · Dallas, TX · 0.6% | $20,000 |
| Person · Attorney, Greenberg Traurig Law · Houston, TX · 0.6% | $20,000 |
188 smaller sources, $254K in all (7.1%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| $40,000 |
| 54 contributions · 0.8% | $27,850 |
| 1 contribution · 0.4% | $15,000 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 73 contributions · 22% of ranked | $112,033 |
| 1 contribution · 6.7% of ranked | $35,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 25 contributions · 6% of ranked | $31,200 |
| 4 contributions · 5.8% of ranked | $30,000 |
| 2 contributions · 5.6% of ranked | $29,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.8% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 5 contributions · 4% of ranked | $21,043 |
| 6 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $20,000 |
A further $2,998,788 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($14,017) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 60 contributions · 23% of ranked | $115,593 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 26 contributions · 16% of ranked | $77,733 |
| 1 contribution · 7.1% of ranked | $35,000 |
| 1 contribution · 5.1% of ranked | $25,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 42 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $23,800 |
| 8 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $23,000 |
| 8 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $22,750 |
| 3 contributions · 3% of ranked | $15,000 |
A further $3,027,288 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($14,017) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $3,593,184
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 285 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
1 payment was reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $1,478 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 8 payments · 55% of all spending | $2,000,000 |
| 3 payments · 13% of all spending | $475,000 |
| 8 payments · 6.1% of all spending | $221,677 |
| 11 payments · 5.1% of all spending | $185,000 |
| 5 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $80,000 |
| 4 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $80,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $70,000 |
| 30 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $60,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 119 payments totaling $416.6K.
| $3.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to IMPOSSIBLE TO INEVITABLE · 2 payments | $3.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |