Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › House campaign committee › 2025–2026
Other candidates' campaignsAnother candidate’s own campaign committee, or a joint fundraising committee. Money one campaign gives another counts here.Parties & politicians
House campaign committeePrincipal campaign committeeThousand Oaks, CaliforniaActive
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00933630 · files quarterly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 7 | $7K · 7.2% |
| Other party committees | 1 | $90K · 93% |
| All recipients | 8 | $97K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 2 | $2K |
| Nevada | 2 | $2K |
| New Jersey | 2 | $2K |
| Arizona | 1 | $1K |
Bars drawn to $90K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO. 12 · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to CALIFORNIA CITRUS MUTUAL · 5 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL UNION OF HEALTHCARE WORKERS · 2 payments | $8.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS · 2 payments | $7.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION · 4 payments | $7K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BRANCH 193 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE (AAJ) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS · 1 payment | $5K |
$303.3K from 93 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 3 payments | $90K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CALIFORNIA HOUSE MAJORITY FUND · 1 payment | $1K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to ELECT TERESA VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $1K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 1 payment | $1K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $1K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 1 payment | $1K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to SUSIE LEE VICTORY FUND 2024 · 1 payment |
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 725 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $902.5K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $1,170,990
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
31% to named individuals, 1.8% to organizations, 64% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 47% | $550,965 |
| Person · Camarillo, CA · 0.7% | $8,100 |
| Person · Real Estate, IMT Residential · Thousand Oaks, CA · 0.7% | $8,000 |
| Person · Software, Vitu · Newbury Park, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Nurse Practitioner, Coastal Kids · Newbury Park, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Entrepreneur, Self-Employed · Los Angeles, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Park City, UT · 0.6% | $7,000 |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 647 contributions · 87% | $784,072 |
| 21 contributions · 3.4% | $30,750 |
| 7 contributions · 1.8% | $16,000 |
| 5 contributions · 1.6% | $14,500 |
| 3 contributions · 1.1% | $9,500 |
| 6 contributions · 0.8% |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $713,179
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$713.2K spent from Jan 2026 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $239K, May 14 – Jun 30, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Jacqui Irwin for Congress is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a House campaign committee. It is a principal campaign committee. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
| $1K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BLUE DOG VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $1K |
$97K across 9 recipient committees, or 14% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 8 are shown. A further $635 was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
| Person · TV Director, Porpoise Productions Ltd · Santa Rosa Valley, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Executive, Patagonia Works · Ventura, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Management, Servicenow · Atlanta, GA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · Chair, One Reef · Palo Alto, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Writer, Self-Employed · Santa Monica, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Public Safety, Covered 6 · Moorpark, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · CEO, Globalwide Media · Westlake Village, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · President, Haas Automation Inc · Henderson, NV · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Managing Director, Medley Partners LLC · Atherton, CA · also behind 2 other groups · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · CEO, Western Pacific MED-Corp · San Francisco, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Housewife · Thousand Oaks, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Retired · Thousand Oaks, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Retail Consultant, Tiger Capital Group LLC · Westlake Village, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Retired · Malibu, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Beverly Hills, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Bald Head Island, NC · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · CEO, Meissner Corp. · Camarillo, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Executive Director of QA, Meissner Corp. · Camarillo, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Real Estate Asset Manager, The Ring Group · Los Angeles, CA · also behind 1 other group · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Founder, Raynor Cerebellum Project · Fort Worth, TX · also behind 1 other group · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Fort Worth, TX · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Vice Chairman, The Wonderful Co. · Los Angeles, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Chairman, The Wonderful Co. · Los Angeles, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Homemaker · Pacific Palisades, CA · also behind 2 other groups · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Pacific Palisades, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · CEO, Sage Publications Inc · Westlake Village, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Real Estate Developer, Sinclair Co. · Thousand Oaks, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · CEO, Docusign · Menlo Park, CA · 0.6% | $7,000 |
| Person · Berkeley, CA · 0.5% | $6,000 |
| Person · Grantmaker, Retired · Menlo Park, CA · 0.5% | $6,000 |
| Person · Auto Dealer, Shaver Automotive Group, Inc · Westlake Village, CA · 0.5% | $6,000 |
| Person · Engineer, Space Vector Corp. · Simi Valley, CA · 0.5% | $5,900 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.8% | $9,266 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.8% | $9,089 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.8% | $9,063 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.8% | $8,937 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.8% | $8,785 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.7% | $8,345 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 0.6% | $6,761 |
4330 smaller sources, $266.6K in all (23%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| $7,400 |
| 3 contributions · 0.8% | $7,250 |
| 7 contributions · 0.6% | $5,250 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 146 contributions · 19% of ranked | $147,745 |
| Written instead of an employer · 62 contributions · 8.8% of ranked | $69,750 |
| Written instead of an employer · 29 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $42,250 |
| 14 contributions · 3% of ranked | $24,000 |
| 5 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 8 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $10,500 |
A further $56,499 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($23,949) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 139 contributions · 17% of ranked | $142,225 |
| 28 contributions · 6.9% of ranked | $59,600 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 36 contributions · 5% of ranked | $43,270 |
| 33 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $30,100 |
| 34 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $29,327 |
| 12 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $20,500 |
| 9 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $19,000 |
| 9 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $17,750 |
A further $41,499 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($23,949) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $710,779
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 221 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
11 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $34,093 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 9 payments · 30% of all spending | $214,397 |
| 3 payments · 13% of all spending | $90,000 |
| 1 payment · 7% of all spending | $50,000 |
| 3 payments · 7% of all spending | $50,000 |
| 17 payments · 5.5% of all spending | $39,359 |
| 10 payments · 5% of all spending | $35,933 |
| 1 payment · 4.7% of all spending | $33,300 |
| 46 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $27,965 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.