FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00925784 · files quarterly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$309.9K raised, $101K spent, $208.9K cash on hand (through Sep 30, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
57% filed as other receipts · 29% from donors giving $200 or less · largest donor Ross Boucher, $100K. See who funds it
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
$10K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $309,850 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$177,37257%
Where it came from
Ross BoucherOne contribution on Jul 21, 2026 · N/A · NOT EMPLOYED · SAN FRANCISCO, CA$100,000
David White9 contributions, latest Jun 25, 2026 · MUSICIAN · CHURCH OF ASCENSION · CHICAGO, IL$1,770
Mackenzie BrayOne contribution on Dec 5, 2025 · ARCHITECT · SELF-EMPLOYED · PARADISE VLY, AZ$1,000
Ford JohnsonOne contribution on Feb 21, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · N/A · OAKLAND, CA$1,000
Daniel Lobo-Lewis2 contributions, latest Feb 26, 2026 · DALLAS, TX$814
Paul Edwards3 contributions, latest Aug 5, 2026 · SELF-EMPLOYED · FOUNDER CEO · TUCSON, AZ$781
The 13 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$88,49029%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$33,97311%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$10,0003.2%
Refunds and rebatesMoney coming back to the committee: rebates and refunds of what it spent, contributions it made that were returned, and loans it made that were repaid.$16<0.1%
Total reported receipts $309,850
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Where the money traces to $309.9K followed back through up to 3 committees
55% to named individuals, 1.4% to organizations, 43% not itemized.
Gave directly$240.5K 78%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Not itemized by this committee33%
$103,173
Ross BoucherPerson · San Francisco, CA · also behind 2 other groups · 32%
$100,000
William ConnellPerson · Board of Trustees, Lake Forest College · Lake Forest, IL · 3.2%
$10,000
Marc KatzPerson · Missoula, MT · 3.2%
$10,000
Jeme BrelinPerson · 1.6%
$5,000
Lendri PurcellPerson · President/co-Founder, Families Advocating for Chemic · Petaluma, CA · 1.6%
$5,000
Tessa LewisPerson · Retired · Astoria, NY · 1%
$3,028
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $149,044 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $4.3K
$4.3K+
$17.3K+
$38.8K+
$69K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California20 contributions · 72%
$107,860
Illinois14 contributions · 8.4%
$12,543
Montana2 contributions · 6.9%
$10,250
New York12 contributions · 2.2%
$3,323
Massachusetts13 contributions · 2.2%
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $100,969 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$53,31253%
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$47,65747%
Paid to
Total reported disbursements $100,969
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
What the payments were for $100,083 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$40,69341%
Filed as
SOFTWARE - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$7,640
SALARY - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$6,337
CAMPAIGN FINANCE CONSULTING - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$4,825
COMPLIANCE SERVICES - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$3,600
PAYROLL TAXES - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$2,407
IT CONUSLTING - NON - CONTRIBUTION$2,000
IT CONUSLTING - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$2,000
Spending over time
$101K spent from Jul 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $45.3K, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
$101K
Jul 2025Sep 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$45,336
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$33,243
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$16,405
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$5,986
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “POLITICAL INTEGRITY” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
93 smaller sources, $34.3K in all (11%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
$3,269
Texas10 contributions · 1.6%
$2,354
Arizona5 contributions · 1.4%
$2,031
Indiana6 contributions · 0.6%
$875
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 5 contributions · 77% of ranked
$100,798
Lake Forest College2 contributions · 7.6% of ranked
$10,000
Families Advocating For Chemic1 contribution · 3.8% of ranked
$5,000
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 7 contributions · 1.9% of ranked
$2,510
American Physical Society7 contributions · 1.6% of ranked
$2,100
Church Of Ascension9 contributions · 1.4% of ranked
$1,770
Farsight7 contributions · 1.3% of ranked
$1,750
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 6 contributions · 1.3% of ranked
$1,701
A further $23,261 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($88,490) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 55 contributions · 43% of ranked
$21,407
Board Of Trustees2 contributions · 20% of ranked
$10,000
President/co-founder1 contribution · 9.9% of ranked
$5,000
Senior Program Manager7 contributions · 4.2% of ranked
$2,100
Musician9 contributions · 3.5% of ranked
$1,770
Strategic Financial Consultant7 contributions · 3.5% of ranked
$1,750
Engineer7 contributions · 2.8% of ranked
$1,400
Architect1 contribution · 2% of ranked
$1,000
A further $103,753 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($88,490) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
COMPLIANCE CONSULTING - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$1,512
RESEARCH - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$1,250
TRAVEL - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$574
Paid to
Cohen, Alexander$4,825
Katz Compliance$4,500
Lobo-Lewis, Daniel$4,267
Madhavan, Sriraman$4,000
Oberoi Consulting LLC$4,000
Agosta, Nicolo$3,878
Payroll and staffSalaries, wages, benefits, and payroll services.$32,15032%
Filed as
SALARY$31,510
PAYROLL REGISTRATION$410
PAYROLL SERVICES$230
Paid to
Lobo-Lewis, Daniel$17,154
Agosta, Nicolo$14,356
Corpnet, Inc$410
Gusto$230
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$12,47612%
Filed as
PAYROLL TAXES$12,339
BANK FEE$136
FOREIGN TRANSACTION FEE$1
Paid to
Gusto$12,339
Amalgamated Bank$136
American Express Co.$1
Not broken out by the committeeReported as a lump sum, with memo entries pointed to for the detail. Where those entries were filed and read, this page counts the payees they name instead; what is left here was never itemised.$10,15810%
Filed as
SALARY - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$4,529
CREDIT CARD PAYMENT, SEE MEMOS BELOW IF ITEMIZED - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$4,357
REIMBURSMENT - NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - SHIPPING, SOFTWARE, WEBSITE SERIVECS-SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$693
CREDIT CARD PAYMENT, - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$372
SALARY - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - - SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$200
CREDIT CARD PAYMENT, SEE MEMOS BELOW IF ITEMIZED - NON- CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$5
Paid to
American Express Co.$4,735
Gusto$4,729
Lobo-Lewis, Daniel$693
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$2,0002%
Filed as
IT CONUSLTING$2,000
Paid to
Oberoi Consulting LLC$2,000
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$1,5971.6%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEES - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$1,000
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEES$811
CREDIT CARD REBATE STATEMENT CREDIT-$38
CREDIT CARD CASH REWARDS - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT-$176
Paid to
Oath$1,000
Stripe$811
American Express Co.-$214
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$9931%
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$2550.3%
Filed as
CAMPAIGN FINANCE CONSULTING$255
Paid to
Cohen, Alexander$255
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$10<0.1%
Filed as
SOFTWARE - NON - CONTRIBUTIN ACCOUNT$10
Paid to
Apple$10
Total itemized disbursements $100,083
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 254 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
33 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $64,390 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Gusto42 payments · 65% of all spending
$65,536
American Express Co.10 payments · 18% of all spending
$18,364
Oberoi Consulting LLC3 payments · 5.9% of all spending
$6,000
Lobo-Lewis, Daniel4 payments · 5.8% of all spending
$5,895
Oath1 payment · 1% of all spending
$1,000
Katz Compliance2 payments · 0.9% of all spending
$900
Stripe9 payments · 0.8% of all spending
$811
Sandler Reiff Lamb Rosenstein & Birkenstock, P.C.1 payment · 0.6% of all spending
$600
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Lobo-Lewis, Daniel6 payments, latest Apr 13, 2026REIMBURSMENT - NON CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT - SHIPPING, SOFTWARE, WEBSITE SERIVECS-SEE BELOW IF ITEMIZED$5K
Cohen, Alexander1 payment, latest Dec 8, 2025CAMPAIGN FINANCE CONSULTING - NON - CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$4.8K
American Express Co.19 payments, latest Sep 28, 2026CREDIT CARD PAYMENT, SEE MEMOS BELOW IF ITEMIZED - NON- CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$4.5K