Democratic & progressive groupsOn the Democratic side by their own words, their main funder, or a published source a reviewer cites. A caucus’s PAC is here. A group with one cause is filed under that cause instead.Political groupsPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: 2024 Voter Mobilization Fund
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00833103 · files quarterly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$843.1K raised, $777.6K spent, $190.6K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
85% filed as other receipts · largest donor Stephen Schuler, $40K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$260K spent for candidates and $5K against them, most on VA-05 ($7.3K) · $500 given to candidates and committees, the largest to Maxwell Frost ($500) · 100% of its support to Democrats. See where it goes
Where it spendsWhich races and candidates is its money for or against?
For or against 8 candidates$265,080
In regular reports
$8.9K
3 candidates, through Oct 14, 2026
Newer notices
$256.2K
115 notices since Oct 14, 2026
Josh Turek▲ For · Senate, IAAll in newer notices, latest Oct 31, 2026 · FEC filing$147.6K
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$260K to 7 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $260,043
Democratic 100%
Against candidates $5,038
Democratic 99%
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$500 in 1 payment
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
1
$500 · 100%
All recipients
1
$500
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
Florida
1
$500
Recipients 1
MFMaxwell FrostDemocratic · U.S. House · FL-10 · via Maxwell Alejandro Frost for Congress1 payment, latest Sep 30, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION$500
Bars drawn to $500, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Where the money came from $843,118 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$720,11285%
Where it came from
Movement Voter PAC1 receipt, latest Aug 28, 2026 · Northampton, Massachusetts$50,000
Stephen Schuler8 contributions, latest Sep 29, 2026 · INVESTOR · FINAL FINISH PROPERTIES · OAK PARK, IL$40,000
Pac To The Future2 receipts, latest Apr 29, 2026 · WASHINGTON, District of Columbia$20,000
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $110K from 5 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$55,5756.6%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$31,9943.8%
TransfersMoney moved in from affiliated committees.$18,4012.2%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$17,0352%
ActBlue1 receipt, latest Dec 10, 2025 · Hybrid pac (nonqualified)$35
The 3 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $843,118
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $843.1K followed back through up to 3 committees
19% to named individuals, 0.8% to organizations, 80% not itemized.
Gave directly$641.6K 76%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Not itemized by this committee70%
$588,060
Stephen SchulerPerson · Investor, Final Finish Properties · Oak Park, IL · 4.7%
$40,000
Karon MeyerPerson · Monroe, OH · 0.8%
$7,047
Russell IsaiaPerson · Brookline, MA · 0.8%
$6,500
Through Movement Voter PAC$28.8K 3.4%
Through Movement Voter PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Movement Voter PAC3.4%
$28,795
Through Pac To The Future
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $145,753 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $1.8K
$1.8K+
$7K+
$15.9K+
$28.2K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Illinois25 contributions · 30%
$44,062
California209 contributions · 13%
$18,755
Massachusetts49 contributions · 7.7%
$11,252
Florida73 contributions · 7.4%
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $777,609 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$614,53779%
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $766,663 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$585,58476%
Filed as
DIGITAL FUNDRAISING SERVICES - NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$332,601
SALARIES, PAYROLL TAXES, AND UTILITIES - NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$120,000
PREPAYMENT FOR INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES - NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$26,080
DIGITAL ADVERTISING - NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT
Spending over time
$777.6K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $209.2K, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
$777.6K
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$23,052
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$209,198
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$204,093
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$97,395
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$92,787
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$151,084
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “VOTERS OF TOMORROW” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Voters of Tomorrow PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names 2024 Voter Mobilization Fund as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
$500 across 1 recipient committee, or <0.1% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Politicians' PACs
$22K 2.6%
Through Pac To The Future
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Pac To The Future2.6%
$22,044
Through Battleground CaliforniaGroups spending on one race$12.4K 1.5%
Then Progressive ERA PAC$7.4K 0.9%
Then Progressive ERA PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Progressive ERA PAC0.9%
$7,421
Then Movement Voter PAC$4.9K 0.6%
Then Movement Voter PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Movement Voter PAC0.6%
$4,932
Through Progressive Era PAC$8.6K 1%
Through Progressive Era PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Progressive Era PAC1%
$8,641
Through Vote Save AmericaOther political groups (proposed)$7.2K 0.9%
Through Vote Save America
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Vote Save America0.9%
$7,182
723 smaller sources, $122K in all (14%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
$10,722
Ohio25 contributions · 5.9%
$8,594
Washington43 contributions · 4.3%
$6,262
Virginia31 contributions · 3.8%
$5,507
Oregon60 contributions · 3.6%
$5,230
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 527 contributions · 55% of ranked
$67,354
Final Finish Properties4 contributions · 16% of ranked
$20,000
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 110 contributions · 8.3% of ranked
$10,097
Donald Henley3 contributions · 3.1% of ranked
$3,750
Pacific Anesthesia14 contributions · 2.9% of ranked
$3,500
Deltex Royalty Company2 contributions · 1.6% of ranked
$2,000
Emax1 contribution · 0.8% of ranked
$1,000
NEW Venture Fund1 contribution · 0.8% of ranked
$1,000
A further $23,417 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($55,575) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 645 contributions · 60% of ranked
$83,659
Investor5 contributions · 15% of ranked
$20,500
Professional Musician Writer Producer3 contributions · 2.7% of ranked
$3,750
Anesthesiologist14 contributions · 2.5% of ranked
$3,500
Business Owner34 contributions · 2% of ranked
$2,815
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 39 contributions · 1.6% of ranked
$2,180
Mediator Arbitratir3 contributions · 1.4% of ranked
$2,000
Real Estate12 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$1,550
A further $5,885 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($55,575) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
$18,855
TEXTING SERVICES - NON -CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT$12,307
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$81,90511%
Filed as
FUNDRAISING SERVICES$81,905
Paid to
Grassroots Analytics$81,905
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$50,8036.6%
Filed as
SALARIES, PAYROLL TAXES, AND UTILITIES$50,000
BANK FEES$803
Paid to
Voters of Tomorrow Inc.$50,000
Amalgamated Bank$803
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$27,5513.6%
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$11,9001.6%
Filed as
COMPLIANCE SERVICES$11,900
Paid to
Katz Compliance$11,900
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$5K of it was independent spending for Thomas Perriello$5,0000.7%
Filed as
Campus Media, print and digital advertising - EstimateIndependent spending in support of Thomas Perriello$5,000
Paid to
Voters of Tomorrow Inc.Independent spending in support of Thomas Perriello$5,000
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$2.3K of it was independent spending for Thomas Perriello and for Samuel Kelley Forstag$2,3040.3%
Field and canvassingDoor-to-door canvassing, phone banks and calls to voters, petition and signature gathering, and get-out-the-vote work.$1.3K of it was independent spending for Christina Bohannan and for Thomas Perriello and 1 more$1,3410.2%
Phone Banking - EstimateIndependent spending in support of Thomas Perriello$385
Paid to
Voters of Tomorrow Inc.Independent spending: $736 in support of Christina Bohannan · $385 in support of Thomas Perriello and 1 more$1,341
Payroll and staffSalaries, wages, benefits, and payroll services.$275 of it was independent spending for Thomas Perriello$275<0.1%
Filed as
Staff Time - EstimateIndependent spending in support of Thomas Perriello$275
Paid to
Voters of Tomorrow Inc.Independent spending in support of Thomas Perriello$275
Total itemized disbursements $766,663
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 158 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Goodman Campaigns LLC15 payments · 43% of all spending
$332,601
Voters of Tomorrow Inc.22 payments · 26% of all spending
$205,000
Grassroots Analytics15 payments · 12% of all spending
$92,616
Katz Compliance18 payments · 3.8% of all spending
$29,900
ActBlue Technical Services47 payments · 3.5% of all spending
$27,059
Authentic Campaigns5 payments · 3.4% of all spending
$26,738
Switchboard Public Benefit Corp10 payments · 3% of all spending
$23,045
Join Projects LLC1 payment · 2.4% of all spending
$18,855
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.