Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Other political groupsClearly political, but nothing yet shows a cause or a side: not their own words, their funders or a published source.Political groupsPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Phoenix, ArizonaActive
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00814152 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“Turning Point PAC works to support nationwide candidates who are dedicated to saving our country. TPPAC was established in 2022 by Turning Point Founder and CEO Charlie Kirk. TPPAC strives to support America First candidates who work endlessly to save America.”
Turning Point PAC Inc., on its own site, tppac.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Republican candidates | 8 | $40K · 89% |
| Other PACs and committees | 1 | $5K · 11% |
| All recipients | 9 | $45K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona | 1 | $5K |
| Ohio | 1 | $5K |
| Colorado | 1 | $5K |
| Texas | 1 | $5K |
| Iowa | 1 | $5K |
| Pennsylvania | 1 | $5K |
| Michigan | 1 | $5K |
| Wisconsin | 1 | $5K |
Tap a row with to see who gave.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $17.5M from 23 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $29,502,738
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
7.9% to named individuals, 59% to organizations, 33% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Organization · 57% | $16,889,000 |
| 33% | $9,850,208 |
| Person · CEO, Sasco · Essex, NY · 4% | $1,167,000 |
| Person · CEO, Woodforest National Bank · The Woodlands, TX · also behind 3 other groups · 0.5% | $150,000 |
109 smaller sources, $1.4M in all (4.9%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,680 contributions · 72% | $17,375,295 |
| 682 contributions · 5.4% |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $28,863,260
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$28.9M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $19.2M, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Besides giving through its PAC, Turning Point Brands pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $476.5K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “TURNING POINT BRANDS”, found by searching “TURNING POINT”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Nov 9, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Turning Point PAC Inc. is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (qualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
No approved organization identity yet
Bars drawn to $5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $150K |
$150K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NRCC ARIZONA VICTORY · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to MERRIN VICTORY COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to GROW THE MAJORITY · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to MILLER-MEEKS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to PROTECT THE HOUSE 2024 · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to AMERICAN BATTLEGROUND FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to 2A DEFENSE FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
$45K across 9 recipient committees, or 0.2% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $1,307,834 |
| 3,039 contributions · 3.7% | $894,577 |
| 3,246 contributions · 2.6% | $625,299 |
| 2,221 contributions · 2.5% | $603,377 |
| 787 contributions · 0.9% | $207,401 |
| 753 contributions · 0.8% | $194,803 |
| 869 contributions · 0.8% | $185,545 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 16,260 contributions · 58% of ranked | $3,148,772 |
| 8 contributions · 22% of ranked | $1,167,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,339 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $285,652 |
| 3 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $150,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $75,000 |
| 3 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $50,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 112 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $22,917 |
| 2 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $20,833 |
A further $17,964,058 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,873,870) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 16,275 contributions · 55% of ranked | $3,145,282 |
| 99 contributions · 24% of ranked | $1,362,242 |
| 187 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $108,761 |
| 4 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $75,000 |
| 255 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $45,307 |
| 168 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $41,864 |
| 155 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $38,612 |
| 81 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $33,151 |
A further $17,991,812 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,873,870) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $28,859,340
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 933 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 15 payments · 65% of all spending | $18,870,000 |
| 338 payments · 23% of all spending | $6,776,833 |
| 45 payments · 3% of all spending | $865,051 |
| 1 payment · 0.9% of all spending | $250,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.7% of all spending | $200,000 |
| 6 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $196,824 |
| 8 payments · 0.6% of all spending | $179,991 |
| 2 payments · 0.5% of all spending | $132,500 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 209 payments totaling $20.8M.