Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › WI-07 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, WI-07
Has not served in Congress
12 priorities from alfonsoforwisconsin.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Young Americans shouldn’t be priced out of homeownership. Michael Alfonso will rein in spending, cut red tape, and make it possible for young families to own homes again and build secure, hopeful futures.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfonsoforwisconsin.com/issues
Strong farms mean strong families, and strong families mean a strong America. Michael Alfonso will cut burdensome restrictions, support local agriculture, and make healthy food affordable so we can fight chronic illness and prevent childhood obesity. #MAHA
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfonsoforwisconsin.com/issues
Parents — not bureaucrats — should decide what’s best for their children. Michael Alfonso will support school choice, boost homeschooling protections, and end Marxist race and gender indoctrination in classrooms.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfonsoforwisconsin.com/issues
Like our Founding Fathers, Michael believes every person has an inherent right to life—from conception to natural death. He applauds President Trump, without whom Roe v. Wade would not have been overturned, restoring states’ ability to protect the unborn. Michael strongly opposes Democrats’ efforts to expand dangerous mail-in abortion pills. With a sister-in-law who has Down syndrome, he understands how the abortion industry increasingly operates as a eugenics movement. He rejects efforts to expand assisted suicide. Michael believes a Christian society responds to suffering with care, not death, and fights to ensure every human life is protected, valued, and defended.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfonsoforwisconsin.com/issues
Instead of helping Americans at home, Washington poured billions of dollars into forever wars and foreign aid. Meanwhile, thousands of people are homeless and suffering in Wisconsin alone. Michael Alfonso will put America First, fix problems here, and stop wasteful foreign spending.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfonsoforwisconsin.com/issues
The Founders never intended for the federal government to become a bloated, dysfunctional monstrosity. Michael Alfonso will return power to the states and reduce the size of government.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfonsoforwisconsin.com/issues
Immigration policy must serve the people of this country — not corporations. Mass immigration, including programs like H-1B, hurts American workers and undercuts wages. Michael Alfonso will protect our workers and national identity.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfonsoforwisconsin.com/issues
During the pandemic, politicians trampled on our right to worship. This must never happen again. Michael Alfonso will hold the line on religious liberty and block government overreach.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfonsoforwisconsin.com/issues
Public service should be about serving, not getting rich. Michael Alfonso will fight to ban members of Congress from trading stocks.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfonsoforwisconsin.com/issues
Our right to bear arms is non-negotiable. Michael Alfonso will protect the Second Amendment against any attempt to weaken it. He backs constitutional carry and our right to defend ourselves.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfonsoforwisconsin.com/issues
Too many working families can’t afford medical care. Michael Alfonso will lower costs, increase transparency, and prioritize patients — not bureaucrats and insurers.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfonsoforwisconsin.com/issues
Gen Z is shifting right in record numbers. More conservative. More Christian. But Washington doesn’t represent them right now. In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Michael Alfonso is stepping up to fight for the next generation of Americans, their values, and their future.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · alfonsoforwisconsin.com/issues
FEC filings, Oct 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00924902
76¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 6 reports ($1.3M of $1.8M). Cash on hand went from $279.4K on Dec 31, 2025 to $426.9K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $313,070 | $33,671 | $279,398 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $601,291 | $148,870 | $731,819 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $338,996 | $364,720 | $706,095 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 22, 2026 | $98,189 | $140,876 | $663,408 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $397,080 | $520,063 | $540,425 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $21,415 | $134,902 | $426,939 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Tap a row with to see who gave.
33 endorsers listed on Michael Alfonso’s own campaign site: 17 officials, 13 organizations, 3 people.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 49,663 votes (49%) · 1 of 5 · Full results ↗
Won · 193,911 votes (57%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 777 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.2M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 167 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $418K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 2 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 3 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $83.4K.
Total reported receipts $1,770,041
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
30% of the money placed by state came from inside Wisconsin: $361.9K of $1.2M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 201 contributions · 30% | $361,909 |
| 132 contributions · 14% | $175,499 |
| 85 contributions · 13% | $161,910 |
| 70 contributions · 9.3% | $112,328 |
| 29 contributions · 6.8% | $82,038 |
| 72 contributions · 4.1% | $49,182 |
| 29 contributions · 3.6% | $43,801 |
| 12 contributions · 3.6% | $43,551 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 43 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 353 contributions · 18% of ranked | $212,763 |
| Written instead of an employer · 55 contributions · 11% of ranked | $123,599 |
| Written instead of an employer · 14 contributions · 5.9% of ranked | $68,750 |
| 9 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $32,746 |
| 4 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $28,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 16 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $15,540 |
| 6 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $14,500 |
A further $39,708 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($69,840) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
What the committees giving to Alfonso’s campaign or spending on ads about Alfonso are: a company or industry, a union, a cause, a party or politician. Money from individual donors is not included.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
Tap a slice or a name to open it.
“Proposed” marks money from groups whose place is not yet reviewed by a person. Each group is placed by its filings and its own words, never by which party it backs. Every interest · How groups are placed
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Each group that spent in this race is followed to where its own money came from, and what it spent is split by those shares: a group whose money was 60% one person's counts as 60% of its spending theirs. Of what traced, 52% to named individuals, 7.7% to organizations, 2.8% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 5.9% to committees nothing more could be followed from, 31% not itemized in the filings.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Person · CEO, Uline · behind Northwoods PAC | $1.5M |
| Person · CEO & Owner, Uline · behind Northwoods Future PAC | $888.4K |
| Organization · tax-exempt: need not name its donors · behind American Future Fund Political Action | $129.6K |
| Organization · behind Northwoods Future PAC and Americans 4 Security PAC and 1 more | $112.5K |
| Organization · behind Northwoods Future PAC | $111.1K |
| Person · Investor, O-Corp Investments · behind Northwoods Future PAC | $111.1K |
| Organization · behind American Future Fund Political Action | $77.8K |
| Person · President, Neal Land & Neighborhoods LLC · behind Northwoods Future PAC | $44.4K |
| Organization · behind Americans 4 Security PAC | $38.5K |
| Person · Attorney, Robinhood Markets Inc · behind Northwoods Future PAC | $22.2K |
| Person · CEO, Neal Communites · behind Northwoods Future PAC | $22.2K |
| Person · CEO, Palantir · behind Americans 4 Security PAC | $6.7K |
Read for the 10 largest groups of 11, 99.8% of the $5M spent. Shares are of what each group received, not a record of which dollar went where; an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail; a person who gave by more than one route is counted once here. It shows who stood behind the money, not what it was for.
The campaign also refunded $34,739 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Total itemized disbursements $1,307,950
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 471 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
10 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $96,882 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments · 33% of all spending | $439,747 |
| 5 payments · 12% of all spending | $157,429 |
| 33 payments · 8.4% of all spending | $113,285 |
| 6 payments · 7% of all spending | $94,472 |
| 4 payments · 5.2% of all spending | $70,163 |
| 9 payments · 4.1% of all spending | $55,486 |
| 1 payment · 2.9% of all spending | $39,068 |
| 2 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $30,781 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 350 contributions · 18% of ranked | $212,478 |
| 29 contributions · 9.4% of ranked | $109,982 |
| 27 contributions · 8.7% of ranked | $102,291 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 15 contributions · 5.9% of ranked | $69,750 |
| 25 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $57,291 |
| 32 contributions · 4% of ranked | $47,022 |
| 11 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $37,664 |
| 13 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $33,870 |
A further $41,708 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($69,840) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.