FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00774844 · files quarterly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$1.1M raised, $1.1M spent, $67.5K cash on hand (through Sep 30, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
81% from donors giving over $200 · 13% from PACs and other committees · largest donor Sherman McLeod, $13K. See who funds it
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $1,112,839 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$905,51981%
Largest donors
Sherman McLeodOne contribution on Dec 31, 2025 · BUSINESS OWNER · PTTI · PHILADELPHIA, PA$13,000
Mark R. Nicoletti3 contributions, latest Sep 30, 2025 · PRESIDENT · PSDC · KING OF PRUSSIA, PA$8,000
Joseph S. Zuritsky3 contributions, latest Mar 15, 2026 · PHILADELPHIA, PA$7,400
Michael Barley2 contributions, latest Sep 30, 2025 · CHIEF PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICER · PACE-O-MATIC · SUWANEE, GA$7,000
Jeffrey Brown2 contributions, latest Aug 11, 2025 · EXECUTIVE · BROWN'S SUPER STORES · WESTVILLE, NJ$7,000
John Graham2 contributions, latest Dec 9, 2025 · INSURANCE EXECUTIVE · FOUNDATION RISK PARTNERS · VERONA, NJ$7,000
Matt HaverstickOne contribution on Sep 23, 2025 · ATTORNEY · KLEINBARD · WYNNEWOOD, PA$7,000
Chase LenfestOne contribution on Jul 23, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · WAYNE, PA$7,000
Michael PaceOne contribution on Sep 25, 2025 · CHAIRMAN · PACEOMATIC · CHATTANOOGA, TN$7,000
Gregory SegallOne contribution on Apr 16, 2026 · CEO · VERSA CAPITAL GROUP LLC · PHILADELPHIA, PA$7,000
Lisa Solomon2 contributions, latest Sep 30, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · PHILADELPHIA, PA$7,000
David L. Cohen2 contributions, latest Dec 30, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · PHILADELPHIA, PA$6,989
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 979 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $827.3K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$145,90013%
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$2,8600.3%
Total reported disbursements $1,097,923
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
What the payments were for $1,071,860 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$318,22930%
Filed as
COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING$75,400
FIELD AND CONSTITUENCY OUTREACH CONSULTING$60,000
POLITICAL CONSULTING$38,171
DIGITAL CONSULTING
Spending over time
$1.1M spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $461.9K, Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026.
$1.1M
Jan 2025Sep 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No Lobbying Disclosure Act filings were matched to this committee. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Sharif Street for US is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a House campaign committee. It is a principal campaign committee. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
$7,000
Matt HaverstickPerson · Attorney, Kleinbard · Wynnewood, PA · 0.6%
$7,000
Chase LenfestPerson · Wayne, PA · 0.6%
$7,000
Michael PacePerson · Chairman, Paceomatic · Chattanooga, TN · 0.6%
$7,000
Show 7 more sources
Gave directly, more
Name
Amount
Gregory SegallPerson · CEO, Versa Capital Group LLC · Philadelphia, PA · 0.6%
$7,000
Lisa SolomonPerson · Philadelphia, PA · 0.6%
$7,000
David L. CohenPerson · Philadelphia, PA · 0.6%
$6,989
Anna BoniPerson · EVP & CAO, Parkway Corp. · Philadelphia, PA · 0.5%
$6,000
Tony ElebahPerson · Principal, Larry's Steaks · Villanova, PA · 0.5%
$6,000
Thomas J. KnoxPerson · CEO, Pinpoint Health Benefits · Philadelphia, PA · 0.5%
$6,000
Roger SperlbaumPerson · CFO, Republic Amusements · Parker, CO · 0.5%
$6,000
Through Plumbers Union Local 690 PACBuilding trades (proposed)$13.4K 1.2%
Through Plumbers Union Local 690 PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Plumbers Union Local 690 PAC1.2%
$13,375
Through Composition Roofers Local Union #30 Political Action & Education FundBuilding trades (proposed)$7.1K 0.6%
Through Composition Roofers Local Union #30 Political Action & Education Fund
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Composition Roofers Local Union #30 Political Action & Education Fund0.6%
$7,064
Through Iuoe Operating EngineersBuilding trades (proposed)$5.7K 0.5%
Through Iuoe Operating Engineers
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Iuoe Operating Engineers0.5%
$5,676
1709 smaller sources, $246.9K in all (22%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
North Carolina5 contributions · 1%
$8,500
Colorado2 contributions · 0.8%
$7,000
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 149 contributions · 16% of ranked
$106,956
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 82 contributions · 9.1% of ranked
$59,755
Parkway Corporation7 contributions · 2.7% of ranked
$17,785
Ptti2 contributions · 2.1% of ranked
$14,000
Paceomatic3 contributions · 1.7% of ranked
$11,500
Temple University17 contributions · 1.4% of ranked
$9,500
The Sheller Family Foundation3 contributions · 1.3% of ranked
$8,500
PSDC3 contributions · 1.2% of ranked
$8,000
A further $14,700 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($53,800) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Attorney117 contributions · 10% of ranked
$79,855
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 111 contributions · 9.5% of ranked
$75,107
CEO45 contributions · 6.1% of ranked
$48,010
President28 contributions · 4.8% of ranked
$37,750
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 38 contributions · 4% of ranked
$31,849
Executive21 contributions · 3.8% of ranked
$30,100
Business Owner12 contributions · 3.2% of ranked
$25,100
Consultant28 contributions · 3.1% of ranked
$24,500
A further $14,450 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($53,800) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
$31,513
CAMPAIGN MANAGEMENT SERVICES$29,017
FIELD CONSULTING$25,000
CAMPAIGN CONSULTING$16,129
COMPLIANCE CONSULTING$16,000
ORGANIZING CONSULTING$15,000
CONSTITUENCY OUTREACH CONSULTING$15,000
CONSTITUENCY OUTREACH CONSULTING - VOID. ORIGINAL TRANSACTION DATED 3/5/26.-$3,000
Paid to
TML Communications$60,400
SCL4 LLC$60,000
Josh Uretsky Analytics$45,146
TSE LLC$38,171
New Blue Interactive$31,513
BEE Compliance LLC$16,000
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$206,05219%
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$21,8212%
Filed as
SOFTWARE$21,358
TEXTING$463
Paid to
NGP VAN Inc$14,574
NGP VAN, Inc.$6,477
New Blue Interactive$463
Google$308
Office and administrativeRent, utilities, phones, supplies, equipment, security, food, and campaign merchandise.$15,6611.5%
Filed as
OFFICE RENT$4,709
OFFICE SUPPLIES$4,623
PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES$4,500
OFFICE MANAGEMENT SERVICES$1,000
OFFICE EQUIPMENT$193
FOOD AND BEVERAGE$176
MEETING MEALS$155
FOOD & BEVERAGE$153
MEALS$151
Paid to
Resonance Campaigns$4,500
Susquehana Village$3,709
Call ME First$2,725
PA Democratic Party$1,000
Beard, Ontonio$1,000
Staples$817
Refunds and redesignationsContributions returned to donors or reassigned to another election.$10,0000.9%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION REFUND TO COMMITTEE$10,000
Paid to
Plumbers Union Local 690 PAC$5,000
Purpose PAC$5,000
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$2,6930.3%
Filed as
TRAVEL$2,693
Paid to
Hilton New York$2,257
Amtrak$436
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$1,3270.1%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEE$1,327
Paid to
Democracy Engine LLC$1,327
Not broken out by the committeeReported as a lump sum, with memo entries pointed to for the detail. Where those entries were filed and read, this page counts the payees they name instead; what is left here was never itemised.$1,2200.1%
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 459 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
9 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $13,390 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Ampersand Strategies2 payments · 15% of all spending
$160,000
TML Communications4 payments · 5.5% of all spending
$60,400
SCL4 LLC2 payments · 5.5% of all spending
$60,000
Rittenhouse Political Partners7 payments · 5.1% of all spending
$56,082
Resonance Campaigns9 payments · 4.6% of all spending
$50,580
Josh Uretsky Analytics9 payments · 4.2% of all spending
$45,944
New Blue Interactive8 payments · 3.8% of all spending
$41,977
Lake Research2 payments · 3.8% of all spending
$41,778
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.