Groups spending on one raceGroups set up for one candidate or one race: no parent organization, and 80% or more of their spending on that race, for a candidate, against their rival, or both. A group that is part of an older organization (a trade, union or caucus PAC, or a party leaders’ super PAC shell) stays in its own place even when it spends on one race, and one that has spread across races is filed by its side.Political groups
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
$11.3M raised, $11.4M spent, $262.5K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
54% filed as other receipts · 32% from donors giving $200 or less · largest donor United Democracy Project, $1.7M. See who funds it
Where it goes
$161.5K spent for candidates, most on VA-11 ($161.5K) · $564K given to candidates and committees, the largest to DSCC ($30K) · 98% of its support to Democrats. See where it goes
Where it spendsWhich races and candidates is its money for or against?
“Save Democracy 2026 is running a nationwide effort to confront and defeat Republican extremism up and down the ballot in the 2026 midterm election. To the halls of Congress, Governors mansions, Lieutenant Governorships, Secretaries of State, and State Legislative Chambers, Save Democracy 2026 will be investing millions of dollars to elect strong Democratic leaders who will protect our right to vote, ensure the security of our elections and reform our broken campaign finance system.
At every turn, we have witnessed Donald Trump and Republicans delegitimize our elections, purge millions of Americans from the voter rolls, impose burdensome voting restrictions, cripple the postal service, and block communities of color from their fundamental right to vote.”
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Its site sums up what it stands for in the statement above, and publishes no list of positions beyond it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$610.5K to 60 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $610,498
Democratic 98%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$564,000 in 106 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
61
$454K · 80%
Other or unresolved candidates
1
$10K · 1.8%
Other party committees
1
$30K · 5.3%
Other PACs and committees
7
$75K · 13%
All recipients
70
$569K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
North Carolina
5
$42K
California
6
$40K
Pennsylvania
4
$40K
Florida
6
$40K
Texas
4
$35K
Michigan
3
$25K
Virginia
3
$25K
Maine
2
$20K
The largest 8 of 25 states.
Recipients 70
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $11,330,520 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$6,164,19654%
Where it came from
HMP2 receipts, latest Sep 10, 2026 · Washington, District of Columbia$2,510,000
United Democracy Project2 receipts, latest Aug 4, 2026 · Washington, District of Columbia$1,650,000
Marcia Grand4 contributions, latest Oct 9, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · SAN FRANCISCO, CA$900,000
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $4.6M from 14 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$3,602,01132%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$1,540,25914%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$14,0540.1%
Committees that gave
ActBlue2 receipts, latest Jan 5, 2026 · Hybrid pac (nonqualified)$9,054
The 3 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports. Here they come to $14.1K, more than the $14.1K this committee's own reports show on the line.
Refunds and rebatesMoney coming back to the committee: rebates and refunds of what it spent, contributions it made that were returned, and loans it made that were repaid.$10,000<0.1%
Total reported receipts $11,330,520
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $11.3M followed back through up to 3 committees
24% to named individuals, 7% to organizations, 13% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 55% not itemized.
Barbara StiefelPerson · Retired · Coral Gables, FL · 1.1%
$120,000
Florida Research AllianceOrganization · 0.9%
$107,500
Building A Remarkable Virginia PACOrganization · 0.7%
$84,500
Joseph FalkPerson · Miami, FL · 0.6%
$70,000
Through HMPDemocratic leaders' super PACs 11%
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $3,348,432 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $51K
$51K+
$204K+
$459K+
$816.1K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California14,607 contributions · 38%
$1,275,083
Florida4,337 contributions · 16%
$523,800
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $11,367,966 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Transfers to affiliated committeesMoney moved to a committee under the same sponsor or party.$4,701,88441%
Paid to
SD 20267 payments · latest Oct 13, 2026 · TRANSFER TO AFFILIATED COMMITTEE$3,017,229
SP251 payment · latest Sep 22, 2026 · TRANSFER TO AFFILIATED COMMITTEE$800,000
Safer Alameda County PAC4 payments · latest Oct 14, 2026 · TRANSFER TO AFFILIATED COMMITTEE$476,875
Alameda Come Together PAC2 payments · latest Aug 10, 2026 · TRANSFER TO AFFILIATED COMMITTEE$320,000
Blue Florida Majority3 payments · latest Oct 14, 2026 · TRANSFER TO AFFILIATED COMMITTEE$87,780
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$4,364,74338%
Paid to
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$1,414,22012%
Paid to
Contributions to candidates and other committeesMoney given to federal candidates, party committees and other PACs.$564,0005%
Paid to
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$161,6201.4%
Independent expendituresSpending to support or oppose a candidate, made without coordinating with them.$161,4981.4%
Spent for or against
Stella PekarskySupport · 7 records · latest Jun 17, 2025$161,498
Total reported disbursements $11,367,966
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $11,205,471 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
TransfersMoney moved to an affiliated or authorised committee.$4,701,88442%
Filed as
TRANSFER TO AFFILIATED COMMITTEE$4,701,884
Paid to
SD 2026$3,017,229
SP25$800,000
Safer Alameda County PAC$476,875
Alameda Come Together PAC$320,000
Blue Florida Majority$87,780
Spending over time
$11.4M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $2.8M, September 2026.
$11.4M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$423,001
September 2026$2,786,935
August 2026$1,839,754
July 2026$722,120
June 2026$231,413
May 2026$311,091
April 2026$190,254
March 2026$193,184
February 2026$140,053
January 2026$149,102
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$1,662,863
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$2,718,196
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
This committee’s name carries no organization we could search for in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
SD PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names Crush Maga PAC as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
HCHenry CuellarDemocratic · U.S. House · TX-28 · via Texans For Henry Cuellar Congressional Campaign2 payments, latest Sep 23, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Sep 23, 2025$10K
PAPete AguilarDemocratic · U.S. House · CA-33 · via Pete Aguilar For Congress1 payment, latest Jan 31, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Jan 31, 2025$10K
CPChris PappasDemocratic · U.S. Senate · NH · via Chris Pappas For Senate2 payments, latest Sep 30, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Sep 30, 2025$10K
Bars drawn to $30K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Raymond Edward Smith Jr.2 receipts, latest Jan 12, 2026Raymond Smith for North Carolina · H6NC03229$10K
Jamie Ager2 receipts, latest Dec 19, 2025Ager for Congress · H6NC11248$10K
Don Davis2 receipts, latest May 9, 2025Don Davis for NC · H2NC02287$10K
T. Jonathan Ossoff1 receipt, latest Jan 10, 2025Jon Ossoff for Senate · S8GA00180$10K
Janelle Stelson2 receipts, latest Aug 27, 2025Friends of Janelle Stelson · H4PA10104$10K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
$1.3M
Through HMP
Name
Amount
House Majority ForwardOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 7%
$798,796
Not itemized by HMP2.5%
$279,955
Michael BloombergPerson · Founder, Bloomberg Inc. · New York, NY · also behind 16 other groups · 1.2%
$136,401
Reid G. HoffmanPerson · Partner, Greylock Partners · Menlo Park, CA · also behind 21 other groups · 0.6%
$72,463
Through United Democracy ProjectPro-Israel$1.1M 9.9%
Through United Democracy Project
Name
Amount
Not itemized by United Democracy Project6.1%
$686,970
American Israel Public Affairs CommitteeOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 3.9%
$438,749
1014 smaller sources, $2.4M in all (21%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Arizona4,095 contributions · 7.2%
$240,580
New York5,839 contributions · 3.1%
$102,897
Texas4,581 contributions · 2.9%
$95,615
Virginia2,841 contributions · 2.4%
$78,846
Illinois2,456 contributions · 2.3%
$77,576
Washington4,190 contributions · 2.1%
$69,235
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 72,016 contributions · 85% of ranked
$2,544,919
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 2,453 contributions · 3.9% of ranked
$118,411
Global Strategic Investment Solutions3 contributions · 1% of ranked
$30,000
Little Cottage Boutique1 contribution · 0.8% of ranked
$25,000
Icsi1 contribution · 0.7% of ranked
$20,000
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 0.7% of ranked
$20,000
Fenway Summer LLC3 contributions · 0.6% of ranked
$18,500
Ecofi1 contribution · 0.3% of ranked
$10,500
A further $299,704 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,602,011) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 70,057 contributions · 61% of ranked
$1,846,423
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 1,689 contributions · 24% of ranked
$713,481
Attorney428 contributions · 1.4% of ranked
$42,952
Owner150 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$33,675
Managing Partner3 contributions · 1% of ranked
$30,000
Physician343 contributions · 0.8% of ranked
$24,104
Scientist1 contribution · 0.7% of ranked
$20,000
Investment Management3 contributions · 0.6% of ranked
$18,500
A further $299,704 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,602,011) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Mothership Strategies83 payments · latest Oct 5, 2026 · TEXT MESSAGING SERVICES$3,224,689
Bluebird Technologies LLC4 payments · latest May 6, 2026 · TEXT MESSAGING SERVICES$338,772
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$161.5K of it was independent spending for Stella Pekarsky$635,3435.7%
Filed as
MEDIA PRODUCTION$321,696
ONLINE ADVERTISING$152,149
Direct Mail AdvertisingIndependent spending in support of Stella Pekarsky$76,998
TV AdvertisingIndependent spending in support of Stella Pekarsky$72,500
TV ProductionIndependent spending in support of Stella Pekarsky$12,000
Paid to
DK Strategies$319,696
Mothership Strategies$152,149
Mission Control IncIndependent spending: $77K in support of Stella Pekarsky$78,998
Waterfront StrategiesIndependent spending in support of Stella Pekarsky$72,500
Mvar Media LLCIndependent spending in support of Stella Pekarsky$12,000
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$203,6921.8%
Filed as
MERCHANT FEE$201,465
BANK FEE$2,027
REGISTRATION FEE$200
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$193,274
Numero$8,191
Bank of America$2,027
California Secretary of State$200
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$186,3511.7%
Filed as
DIGITAL CONSULTING$97,704
LEGAL CONSULTING$44,347
COMPLIANCE SERVICES$36,301
COMMUNICATION CONSULTING$3,000
COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING$3,000
COMPLIANCE CONSULTING$2,000
Paid to
Mothership Strategies$97,704
Blue Wave Political Partners LLC$38,087
Olson Remcho LLP$37,864
POD 3 Strategies$6,000
Ashurst Perkins Coie$3,519
Taveras, Angel$2,500
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$121,5821.1%
Filed as
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING$121,582
Paid to
Mothership Strategies$55,535
Waldon, Benjamin$52,047
Hine, Lexi$6,340
Carroll Consulting Group, LLC$6,250
Kennedy, Joseph$1,410
Polling and researchSurveys, opposition research, voter file work, and analytics.$106,6931%
Filed as
RESEARCH$74,218
RESEARCH CONSULTING$32,475
Paid to
Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, Inc.$32,167
Global Strategy Group LLC$31,625
Spiros Consulting$22,121
ALG Polling, Inc.$10,780
MB Public Affairs, Inc.$9,500
WSBS Strategies LLC$500
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$75,3190.7%
Filed as
DIRECT MAIL SERVICES$75,309
POSTAGE$10
Paid to
Mission Control Inc$75,309
Blue Wave Political Partners LLC$10
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$4,894<0.1%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD FEES$4,894
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$4,404
Numero$491
Total itemized disbursements $11,205,471
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 741 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Mothership Strategies101 payments · 36% of all spending
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Mothership Strategies18 payments, latest Oct 9, 2026TEXT MESSAGING SERVICES$869.7K
