Other political groupsClearly political, but nothing yet shows a cause or a side: not their own words, their funders or a published source.Political groupsPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00738039 · files quarterly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$516.9K raised, $311.5K spent, $373.8K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
93% filed as other receipts · largest donor Mijente, $300K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$158.3K spent for candidates, most on TX-09 ($54.6K) · $16K given to candidates and committees, the largest to Battleground California ($15K) · 100% of its support to Democrats. See where it goes
Where it spendsWhich races and candidates is its money for or against?
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$159.3K to 4 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $159,348
Democratic 100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$16,000 in 2 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
1
$1K · 6.3%
Other PACs and committees
1
$15K · 94%
All recipients
2
$16K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
DRDelia C. RamirezDemocratic · U.S. House · IL-03 · via United With Delia For Congress1 payment, latest Sep 30, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Sep 30, 2025$1K
Bars drawn to $15K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Delia Ramirez1 receipt, latest Sep 30, 2025United With Delia for Congress · H2IL03162$1K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
Where the money came from $516,875 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$482,37293%
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $422.5K from 6 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$27,9425.4%
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$4,2010.8%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$2,3600.5%
Total reported receipts $516,875
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $516.9K followed back through up to 3 committees
17% to named individuals, 9.6% to organizations, 58% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 15% not itemized.
Gave directly$437.8K 85%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
MijenteOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 58%
$300,000
Willow ActionOrganization · 9.1%
$46,800
Not itemized by this committee7%
$36,039
Johanna MahonPerson · Teacher & Author, Self Employed · Arlington, VA · 6.8%
$35,000
Becky SilversteinPerson · Rabbi, Svara · Jamaica Plain, MA · also behind 1 other group · 3.9%
$20,000
Through Progressive ERA PAC$45.1K 8.7%
Through Progressive ERA PAC
Name
Amount
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $405,385 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $12K
$12K+
$48K+
$108K+
$192K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Arizona1 contribution · 74%
$300,000
California3 contributions · 12%
$47,550
Virginia1 contribution · 6.2%
$25,000
Massachusetts10 contributions · 5%
$20,225
District of Columbia10 contributions · 2.5%
$10,225
New York28 contributions · 0.2%
$985
Washington18 contributions · 0.2%
$900
Georgia10 contributions · <0.1%
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $311,500 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$157,65351%
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $325,049 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$1.4K of it was independent spending for James Talarico and for Leticia Gutierrez$130,08640%
$311.5K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $105.1K, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
$311.5K1
Jan 2025Nov 2026
1Nov 3, 2026 general election, CA-22, TX-09, TX-SEN$139.6K of its independent spending was aimed at it
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending. The line stops at the latest report, through Oct 14, 2026, at the dashed rule; elections after it are marked where they fall.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$100,943
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$105,102
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$34,521
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$12,702
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$34,532
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$23,700
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “MIJENTE” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
$16K across 2 recipient committees, or 5.1% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Not itemized by Progressive ERA PAC5.6%
$28,802
Quinn DelaneyPerson · Philanthropist, Self · Oakland, CA · also behind 1 other group · 1.6%
$8,271
Wayne JordanPerson · Philanthropist · Oakland, CA · also behind 1 other group · 1.6%
$8,033
Through Movement Voter PAC$14.4K 2.8%
Through Movement Voter PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Movement Voter PAC2.8%
$14,398
73 smaller sources, $19.5K in all (3.8%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
$250
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 11 contributions · 60% of ranked
$35,225
Svara1 contribution · 34% of ranked
$20,000
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 46 contributions · 3.2% of ranked
$1,885
Center For Empowered Politics Educatio1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked
$500
Aristocrat INC10 contributions · 0.4% of ranked
$250
Liuna10 contributions · 0.4% of ranked
$250
Freed Bodyworks9 contributions · 0.4% of ranked
$225
A further $347,050 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,201) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Teacher & Author2 contributions · 60% of ranked
$35,000
Rabbi1 contribution · 34% of ranked
$20,000
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 46 contributions · 3.2% of ranked
$1,885
Director1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked
$500
IT Professional10 contributions · 0.4% of ranked
$250
Organizer10 contributions · 0.4% of ranked
$250
Administrative Assistant9 contributions · 0.4% of ranked
$225
Music Teacher9 contributions · 0.4% of ranked
$225
A further $347,050 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,201) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
$6,448
NON-FEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$5,000
NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: SOFTWARE$2,555
Non-Contribution Account: Campaign LiteratureIndependent spending: $709 in support of James Talarico · $709 in support of Leticia Gutierrez$1,418
Payroll and staffSalaries, wages, benefits, and payroll services.$47.7K of it was independent spending for Leticia Gutierrez and for Randy Villegas and 1 more$58,43818%
Filed as
Staff Time, Campaign, Field, Comms and Data ConsultingIndependent spending: $21.5K in support of Leticia Gutierrez · $10.7K in support of James Talarico$32,245
Staff Time, Campaign, Field and Data ConsultingIndependent spending in support of Randy Villegas$15,471
NON-FEDERAL INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE: STAFF TIME, CAMPAIGN, FIELD, COMMS AND DATA CONSULTING$10,721
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$50.7K of it was independent spending for Randy Villegas and for James Talarico and 1 more$56,79517%
Filed as
Digital AdvertisingIndependent spending in support of Randy Villegas$30,000
Billboard AdvertisingIndependent spending in support of Randy Villegas$8,585
Partial Payment and Partial Actual Cost for Digital Advertising Disclosed on 10/11 48-Hour ReportIndependent spending: $2.1K in support of James Talarico · $2.1K in support of Leticia Gutierrez$4,140
NON-FEDERAL INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE: VIDEO PRODUCTION$4,000
NON-FEDERAL INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE: DIGITAL ADVERTISING$2,070
Paid to
Middle Seat ConsultingIndependent spending in support of Randy Villegas$30,000
Field and canvassingDoor-to-door canvassing, phone banks and calls to voters, petition and signature gathering, and get-out-the-vote work.$38.6K of it was independent spending for Leticia Gutierrez and for James Talarico$52,34216%
Filed as
Partial Payment and Partial Actual Cost for Canvassing Services Disclosed on 9/23 48-Hour ReportIndependent spending: $25.7K in support of Leticia Gutierrez · $12.9K in support of James Talarico$38,624
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$4,0851.3%
Filed as
CATERING$4,085
Paid to
Tiny Tapp & Tiny Cafe$4,085
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$1.1K of it was independent spending for James Talarico and for Leticia Gutierrez$3,3881%
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$2,5490.8%
Filed as
SOFTWARE$1,650
TEXTING SERVICES$825
TEXT MESSAGING$75
Paid to
Quickbooks$1,650
Scale to Win$900
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$9000.3%
Filed as
TRAVEL - GAS$900
Paid to
GIFTCARDS.COM$900
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$8130.2%
Filed as
MANAGEMENT FEES$692
BANK FEES$120
Paid to
Mijente$692
Amalgamated Bank$120
Total itemized disbursements $325,049
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 145 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
1 payment was reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $4,085 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Pocketbook Strategies22 payments · 21% of all spending
$66,616
Mijente8 payments · 21% of all spending
$65,579
Brennand Consulting, LLC3 payments · 17% of all spending
$51,499
Middle Seat Consulting1 payment · 9.6% of all spending
$30,000
Nepantla Strategies1 payment · 9% of all spending
$27,942
Battleground California1 payment · 4.8% of all spending
Love Chain Productions3 payments · 3.9% of all spending
$12,000
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Pocketbook Strategies20 payments, latest Oct 9, 2026NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: COMPLIANCE SERVICES$60.6K
Nepantla Strategies1 payment, latest Jun 15, 2026NON-CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNT: IT CONSULTING$27.9K