$1.8M raised, $3.1M spent, $1.2M cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
99.6% filed as other receipts · largest donor Suzanne Duca, $325K. See who funds it
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
Why this committee exists In its own words
“Tech for Campaigns’ (TFC) mission is to fight extremism and help Democrats win at scale by using advanced commercial digital marketing and data techniques.
To do that, we look for the highest ROI opportunities to utilize digital marketing and data to change electoral outcomes. Our program, The Lab, is our new model for evolving Democratic playbooks to win, designed to push the Democratic ecosystem into the modern age. It’s where Democrats can finally test ideas the way commercial organizations do, replacing a long-standing resistance to experimentation with a structure that forces learning and iteration.”
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Its site sums up what it stands for in the statement above, and publishes no list of positions beyond it.
Who it gives to
Which candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
$40K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $1,846,696 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$1,839,55699.6%
Where it came from
Suzanne Duca3 contributions, latest Feb 5, 2026 · RETIRED · N/A · EL PRADO, NM$325,000
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $481.7K from 14 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$6,5500.4%
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$545<0.1%
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$45<0.1%
Total reported receipts $1,846,696
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $1.8M followed back through up to 3 committees
72% to named individuals, 22% to organizations, 1.3% to tax-exempt organizations that need not name their donors, 4.3% not itemized.
Gave directly$1.7M 92%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Suzanne DucaPerson · Retired · El Prado, NM · 18%
$325,000
Christopher StoltePerson · Retired · Seattle, WA · 6.8%
$125,000
AFSCME Special AccountOrganization · 5.4%
$100,000
AFSCME Working Families FundOrganization · 5.4%
$100,000
Bruce GoldenPerson · Tech Investor, Self-Employed · San Francisco, CA · 5.4%
$100,000
Jocelyn GoldfeinPerson · Managing Director, Zetta Partner Ventures · Los Altos, CA · 5.4%
$100,000
Steve NewmanPerson · Software Engineer, Scalyr · Portola Valley, CA · 5.4%
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $1,732,795 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $25.3K
$25.3K+
$101.2K+
$227.7K+
$404.8K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California143 contributions · 36%
$632,459
New Mexico13 contributions · 19%
$325,445
District of Columbia4 contributions · 12%
$202,750
Washington6 contributions · 10%
$180,000
New York32 contributions · 5.5%
$95,737
Connecticut3 contributions · 3.7%
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $3,095,497 reported
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$3,094,41699.9%
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$25<0.1%
Total reported disbursements $3,095,497
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $3,094,615 itemized
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Payroll and staffSalaries, wages, benefits, and payroll services.$1,050,80334%
Filed as
SALARY$982,215
TEMPORARY STAFFING SERVICES$35,669
VOLUNTEER STAFFING$27,810
Spending over time
$3.1M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.1M, Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025.
$3.1M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026$114,944
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$249,173
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$188,053
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$435,980
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$988,686
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$1,118,661
Show other payments: transfers, refunds and the rest
A name search for “TECH FOR CAMPAIGNS” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Fund for Policy ReformOrganization · tax-exempt organization that need not name its donors · 1.2%
$22,438
Then Services Employees International Union Committee on Political EducationService, health-care & other unions (including the AFL-CIO)$10.3K 0.6%
Then Services Employees International Union Committee on Political Education
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Services Employees International Union Committee on Political Education0.6%
$10,313
Through Midwest Values PACPoliticians' PACs$35.8K 1.9%
Through Midwest Values PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by Midwest Values PAC1.3%
$23,925
Then AFS PAC$11.9K 0.6%
Then AFS PAC
Name
Amount
Not itemized by AFS PAC0.6%
$11,878
137 smaller sources, $59.3K in all (3.2%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
$63,398
Florida8 contributions · 3.2%
$55,125
Virginia2 contributions · 2.8%
$48,500
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 22 contributions · 24% of ranked
$149,742
Scalyr1 contribution · 16% of ranked
$100,000
Zetta Partner Ventures1 contribution · 16% of ranked
$100,000
Bessemer Venture Partners1 contribution · 8.1% of ranked
$50,000
Netflix INC2 contributions · 7.2% of ranked
$45,000
Y Combinator11 contributions · 6.3% of ranked
$39,000
Northeastern University2 contributions · 5.6% of ranked
$35,000
Salesforce3 contributions · 4.2% of ranked
$26,000
A further $1,111,878 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($545) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 59 contributions · 50% of ranked
$677,695
Software Engineer18 contributions · 7.5% of ranked
$101,345
Managing Director1 contribution · 7.4% of ranked
$100,000
Tech Investor1 contribution · 7.4% of ranked
$100,000
Partner12 contributions · 6.6% of ranked
$89,000
Community Volunteer1 contribution · 3.7% of ranked
$50,000
Product Management3 contributions · 3.4% of ranked
$45,250
Professor2 contributions · 2.6% of ranked
$35,000
A further $384,183 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($545) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
PAYROLL SERVICES
$5,110
Paid to
Savransky, Julie$184,876
Levinson, Nora$175,805
Sanders, Jessica$158,067
YEE, KA-Ping$124,284
Alter, Jessica$94,626
Cashel, Alice$82,599
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$594,04319%
Filed as
PAYROLL TAXES$589,082
BANK FEE$3,536
BUSINESS TAX$857
BROKERAGE FEES$469
REGISTERED AGENT FEE$98
Paid to
Gusto Financial Services, Inc.$589,082
Amalgamated Bank$3,536
California Franchise Tax Board$857
Osaic Institutions$469
Corporate Filings LLC$98
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$315,36210%
Filed as
STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICES$100,522
COMPLIANCE SERVICES$69,012
LEGAL SERVICES$68,537
ACCOUNTING SERVICES$58,319
WEBSITE CONSULTING SERVICES$9,000
FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICES$8,472
DIGITAL CONSULTING SERVICES$1,500
Paid to
Premier Political Compliance Inc.$69,012
Elias Law Group$58,600
Najar, Jennifer$54,110
PAK, Gina$38,000
Scholl, Diana$29,214
Hong, Jeong$15,600
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$246,1118%
Filed as
RETIREMENT PLAN$188,213
VOTER TURNOUT PROGRAM$42,576
RECRUITING SERVICES$10,000
GRASSROOT MANAGEMENT SERVICES$8,903
SPONSORSHIP$6,000
MARKETING SERVICES$4,440
RETIREMENT PLAN SERVICES$2,865
VOTER INFORMATION SERVICES$2,500
NONFEDERAL INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE SUPPORTING SUSAN CRAWFORD$1,820
CAR RENTAL$695
REGISTERED AGENT SERVICES$684
PO BOX RENTAL$476
Paid to
Guideline$190,566
Nextgen America$42,576
Booksa, Steven$10,000
Pixiebug Marketing Services LLC$8,903
Higher Ground Labs$6,000
Stephens, Desiree$4,440
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$237,2817.7%
Filed as
SOFTWARE$219,707
TEXT MESSAGES$7,425
DATABASE SERVICES$6,250
TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICES$3,340
SUBSCRIPTION$399
WEBSITE HOSTING SERVICES$161
Paid to
Hubspot, Inc.$53,993
Flashpoint AI$50,000
NGP VAN, Inc.$20,215
CUSTOMER.IO$11,461
Zapier Inc.$10,767
Zanger Digital$8,416
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$216,7067%
Filed as
DONATION$105,206
NONFEDERAL CONTRIBUTION$99,000
NONFEDERAL INKIND CONTRIBUTION-6/2 WEBSITE SERVICES, FRIENDS OF JAMES MALONE$2,270
NONFEDERAL INKIND CONTRIBUTION-6/2 WEBSITE SERVICES, FRIENDS OF EILEEN ALBILAR$2,270
NONFEDERAL INKIND CONTRIBUTION-6/2 WEBSITE SERVICES, FRIENDS OF CHRISTOPHER THOMAS$2,270
NONFEDERAL INKIND CONTRIBUTION-6/2 WEBSITE SERVICES, FRIENDS OF BRIAN WRIGHTSON$1,520
NONFEDERAL INKIND CONTRIBUTION-6/2 WEBSITE SERVICES. FRIENDS OF BRIAN WRIGHTSON$750
NONFEDERAL INKIND CONTRIBUTION-7/1 WEBSITE EXPENSES, FRIENDS OF BRIAN WRIGHTSON$250
NONFEDERAL INKIND CONTRIBUTION-7/1 WEBSITE EXPENSES, FRIENDS OF EILEEN ALBILLAR$250
NONFEDERAL INKIND CONTRIBUTION-7/1 WEBSITE EXPENSES, FRIENDS OF JAMES MALONE$250
NONFEDERAL INKIND CONTRIBUTION-7/1 WEBSITE EXPENSES, FRIENDS OF CHRISTOPHER THOMAS$250
NONFEDERAL INKIND CONTRIBUTION- 8/1 WEBSITE EXPENSES, FRIENDS OF BRIAN WRIGHTSON$250
Paid to
For Michigan$80,000
A Better Wisconsin Together Political Fund$60,000
Half Court Political Fund$30,000
Wisconsin Ideas Project$25,000
The Prompting Co.$7,000
Brit Crampsie Communications, LLC$5,500
Office and administrativeRent, utilities, phones, supplies, equipment, security, food, and campaign merchandise.$156,7285.1%
Filed as
INSURANCE$150,223
OFFICE SPACE RENTAL$5,865
OFFICE SUPPLIES$327
MEALS$313
Paid to
Covered California for Small Business$106,251
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield$20,141
Beam Dental$13,251
Employer Insurance$7,244
The Yard$5,865
Thatch$2,117
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$150,9834.9%
Filed as
NONFEDERAL DIGITAL ADVERTISING$124,799
SOCIAL MEDIA CONSULTING$13,250
SOCIAL MEDIA SERVICES$12,750
DIGITAL ADVERTISING$184
Paid to
Meta Platforms, Inc.$124,983
Annie Rubin Consulting$13,250
Andrews, Ashley$12,000
Nevermind Productions Corp.$250
Crow, Jordan$250
Williams, Mariah$250
Polling and researchSurveys, opposition research, voter file work, and analytics.$59,9901.9%
Filed as
DATA STORAGE & SOFTWARE$18,575
DATA STORAGE SERVICES$15,913
DATA SCIENCE CONSULTING$10,000
DATA ANALYTICS SERVICES$6,600
SOFTWARE & DATA STORAGE$6,517
RESEARCH$1,665
DATA ENTRY$370
DATA CONSULTING SERVICES$350
Paid to
Google Inc.$25,092
Amazon WEB Services$15,913
Jancsy, Michael$10,000
Sloan, Jeffrey$6,600
Sabio, Magat$1,665
Pinto, Neha$370
Field and canvassingDoor-to-door canvassing, phone banks and calls to voters, petition and signature gathering, and get-out-the-vote work.$36,5701.2%
Filed as
GOTV ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES$36,570
Paid to
Bell, Samantha$20,000
Russell, Euphemia$12,430
Daby, Calandra$2,280
Feldman, Jackie$1,860
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$10,8990.4%
Filed as
TRAVEL$10,749
REIMBURSEMENT, TRAVEL$150
Paid to
Alaska Airlines$2,743
American Airlines$1,682
United Airlines$1,277
Hyatt$1,115
Uber$861
American Express Travel$822
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$6,2440.2%
Filed as
DESIGN SERVICES$3,648
WEBSITE DESIGN SERVICES$2,369
SHIPPING$227
Paid to
Rigby, Sian$2,678
Crowley, Brian$1,500
Pinto, Neha$970
Sanders, Jessica$869
Fedex Office$227
Not broken out by the committeeReported as a lump sum, with memo entries pointed to for the detail. Where those entries were filed and read, this page counts the payees they name instead; what is left here was never itemised.$6,0710.2%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PAYMENT, SEE BELOW$6,015
REIMBURSEMENT, SEE BELOW$56
Paid to
American Express$5,923
Cardmember Services$92
Savransky, Julie$44
YEE, KA-Ping$13
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$4,8740.2%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEES$4,061
CREDIT CARD PAYMENT, SOFTWARE$399
CREDIT CARD FEE$375
CREDIT CARD PAYMENT - SOFTWARE$38
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$3,784
Cardmember Services$437
American Express$375
Stripe, Inc.$277
Refunds and redesignationsContributions returned to donors or reassigned to another election.$1,950<0.1%
Filed as
REFUND$1,950
Paid to
Koegel, Erin$1,300
Finke, Leigh$650
Total itemized disbursements $3,094,615
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,411 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
79 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $375,074 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Gusto Financial Services, Inc.87 payments · 19% of all spending
$594,705
American Express54 payments · 11% of all spending
$353,378
Guideline42 payments · 6.2% of all spending
$190,566
Levinson, Nora18 payments · 6.1% of all spending
$189,746
Savransky, Julie19 payments · 6% of all spending
$185,936
Sanders, Jessica15 payments · 5.1% of all spending
$158,936
YEE, KA-Ping16 payments · 4% of all spending
$124,939
Covered California for Small Business12 payments · 3.4% of all spending
$106,251
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Gusto Financial Services, Inc.87 payments, latest Oct 6, 2026PAYROLL TAXES$594.7K
Guideline42 payments, latest Oct 5, 2026RETIREMENT PLAN$190.6K