Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Politicians' PACsPACs a politician sponsors or runs: a leadership PAC (the FEC’s designation D), a committee the FEC lists as sponsored by a candidate, or a super PAC the politician’s own team runs and press reports tie to them. One that exists only for that politician’s own race is under Groups spending on one race.Parties & politicians
PAC (qualified)Minneapolis, MinnesotaActive
Connected organization: AFS PAC
"We Fight for Middle Class Values & Democratic Candidates" Senator Al Franken founded Midwest Values PAC (MVP) in the fall of 2005 in order to provide financial and organizational support to progressive candidates and causes in his home state of Minnesota, throughout the Midwest, and around the country. (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00416131 · files monthly
“For over 15 years, Midwest Values PAC has supported progressive Democrats — from legislatures to Congress — who share our values.”
Midwest Values PAC, on its own site, midwestvaluespac.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 32 | $140K · 57% |
| Democratic party committees | 2 | $10K · 4.1% |
| Other PACs and committees | 8 | $95K · 39% |
| All recipients | 42 | $245K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota | 4 | $25K |
| New York | 2 | $15K |
| Michigan | 3 | $15K |
| Pennsylvania | 5 | $12.5K |
| Maine | 2 | $10K |
| Illinois | 3 | $10K |
| Kansas | 2 | $10K |
| Iowa | 3 | $10K |
The largest 8 of 15 states.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $1.2M |
$1.2M from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $40K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $15K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to WOMEN WINNING · 3 payments | $10K |
Tap a row with to see who gave.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 7,143 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $917.5K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $3,803,900
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
7.5% to named individuals, 3% to organizations, 90% not itemized.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 60% | $2,275,210 |
| Organization · 0.7% | $25,156 |
| Person · Carmel, IN · also behind 10 other groups · 0.6% | $22,000 |
| Person · Brooklyn, NY · 0.5% | $20,200 |
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 30% | $1,129,530 |
| Organization · 2.3% |
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,207 contributions · 20% | $189,187 |
| 1,080 contributions · 14% | $134,123 |
Tap a row with to see who was paid.
Total reported disbursements $2,644,231
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
$2.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $752.5K, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Late 30G report, 2006$7.2K assessed
Case 1669 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Nov 1, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
"We Fight for Middle Class Values & Democratic Candidates" Senator Al Franken founded Midwest Values PAC (MVP) in the fall of 2005 in order to provide financial and organizational support to progressive candidates and causes in his home state of Minnesota, throughout the Midwest, and around the country. Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Midwest Values PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $40K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to FIGHT BACK MIDWEST · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to JOSH RILEY VICTORY FUND · 4 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to IMPOSSIBLE TO INEVITABLE · 2 payments | $10K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to MINNESOTA HOUSE DFL CAUCUS · 1 payment | $5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC WI STATE PARTY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $5K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $5K |
$245K across 42 recipient committees, or 9.3% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $88,394 |
48 smaller sources, $243.4K in all (6.4%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
| $111,575 |
| 319 contributions · 4.7% | $44,670 |
| 321 contributions · 4.2% | $40,231 |
| 364 contributions · 3.8% | $35,934 |
| 117 contributions · 3.5% | $33,650 |
| 242 contributions · 2.5% | $24,336 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 4,692 contributions · 70% of ranked | $561,147 |
| Written instead of an employer · 595 contributions · 11% of ranked | $84,895 |
| Written instead of an employer · 171 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $19,805 |
| 3 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $5,005 |
| 1 contribution · 0.6% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 3 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 31 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $3,100 |
A further $144,620 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,561,838) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 4,785 contributions · 62% of ranked | $567,359 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 526 contributions · 13% of ranked | $117,862 |
| 44 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $19,393 |
| 71 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $14,950 |
| 100 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $14,601 |
| 48 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $13,260 |
| 38 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $6,685 |
| 97 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $6,581 |
A further $40,563 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,561,838) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $2,587,354
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 636 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
1 payment was reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $489 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 28 payments · 31% of all spending | $829,885 |
| 28 payments · 12% of all spending | $310,611 |
| 8 payments · 10% of all spending | $268,853 |
| 10 payments · 7.5% of all spending | $198,260 |
| 26 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $103,875 |
| 111 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $73,702 |
| 22 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $59,500 |
| 4 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $55,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Transfers, refunds, and everything else the committee itemized outside candidate giving. 17 payments totaling $224K.