Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted.Find your ballot →
PACs › Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) › 2025–2026
SCA
Senate Conservatives Action
Republican & conservative groupsOn the Republican side by their own words, their main funder, or a published source a reviewer cites. A group with one cause is filed under that cause instead.Political groupsPlaced by our rules or a model’s suggestion, and not yet checked by a person. The money still counts here; a person may move it.
Super PAC (independent expenditure-only)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
$1.3M raised, $1.6M spent, $372.1K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
85% from donors giving over $200 · largest donor Michael Rydin, $500K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$823.4K spent for candidates, most on FL-SEN ($115.2K) · 70% of its support to Republicans, 30% to candidates of other or unresolved parties. See where it goes
Where it spendsWhich races and candidates is its money for or against?
For or against 25 candidates$823,406
In regular reports
$783.4K
25 candidates, through Oct 14, 2026
Newer notices
$40K
8 notices since Oct 14, 2026
Ashley Moody▲ For · Senate, FL$5K of it in newer notices, latest Oct 15, 2026 · FEC filing$97.3K
Bill Hagerty▲ For · Senate, TN$5K of it in newer notices, latest Oct 15, 2026 · FEC filing$79K
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
Why this committee exists In its own words
“SCA is the Super PAC arm of the Senate Conservatives Fund (SCF), which is a national organization that promotes conservative policies and helps elect principled candidates to the United States Senate.
SCA helps candidates by running hard-hitting, independent ads to promote them while SCF helps raise money directly for their campaigns by bundling contributions from thousands of freedom-loving Americans across the country.”
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. Any side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Its site sums up what it stands for in the statement above, and publishes no list of positions beyond it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$823.4K to 25 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $823,406
Republican 70%Other or unresolved 30%
Support by the party of the candidate
Party of the candidate
Candidates
Direct
Independent
Amount
Share
Republican
16
$0
$580,484
$580,484
70%
Other or unresolved
9
$0
$242,922
$242,922
30%
Shown support
25
$0
$823,406
$823,406
100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Committees funding this one
Name
Amount
Lummis for Wyoming Inc.Senate campaign committee · Connected to FINANCIAL INNOVATION VICTORY COMMITTEE · 1 payment
$50K
$50K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $1,270,645 reported receipts
Tap a row with to see who gave.
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$1,083,87585%
Bernard Koether23 contributions, latest Oct 11, 2026 · RETIRED · FORT LAUDERDALE, FL$23,000
John D. Scott20 contributions, latest Aug 11, 2026 · RETIRED · LAKE DELTON, WI$20,000
Emmanuel ZuluetaOne contribution on Feb 24, 2026 · RETIRED · APEX, NC$20,000
Norman RogersOne contribution on Dec 29, 2025 · HOUSTON, TX$10,000
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 206 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.1M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$97,7377.7%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$50,0003.9%
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings and this committee's lines for them, whichever is larger, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$39,0003.1%
Where it came from
Raymond James22 receipts, latest Sep 30, 2026 · ATHENS, Georgia$39,000
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$33<0.1%
Total reported receipts $1,270,645
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Where the money traces to $1.3M followed back through up to 3 committees
86% to named individuals, 3.1% to organizations, 9.1% not itemized.
Gave directly$1.2M 92%
Gave directly
Name
Amount
Michael RydinPerson · Retired · Houston, TX · also behind 2 other groups · 39%
$500,000
Arthur B. ChoatePerson · Investor, Self · Coral Gables, FL · 12%
$155,000
Not itemized by this committee8.7%
$110,810
Sarah RindlaubPerson · Retired · Nokomis, FL · 6.7%
$85,000
Werner MinshallPerson · Real Estate, MDC Inc · Teton Village, WY · 3.9%
Independent expendituresSpending to support or oppose a candidate, made without coordinating with them.$783,40650%
Spent for or against
Total reported disbursements $1,573,452
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $1,572,683 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized, including its independent expenditures, which are filed against the candidate each was for or against rather than as payments to a vendor. Open a category to see which candidates its independent spending went to, and in support or opposition.
Tap a row with to see what was paid for.
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$702.2K of it was independent spending for Ashley Moody and for Bill Hagerty and 10 more$702,20645%
Filed as
IE-MOODY-DIRECT MAIL PRODUCTIONIndependent spending in support of Ashley Moody$77,065
IE-HAGERTY-DIRECT MAIL PRODUCTIONIndependent spending in support of Bill Hagerty$67,293
IE-SCHMITT-DIRECT MAIL PRODUCTION
Spending over time
$1.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $265.9K, August 2026.
$1.6M1
Jan 2025Oct 2026
1Aug 18, 2026 primary, FL-SEN$86.4K of its independent spending was aimed at it
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending.
A name search for “SENATE CONSERVATIVES ACTION” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Senate Conservatives Action is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Super PAC (independent expenditure-only). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Senate Conservatives Action is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
R. ScheidemanPerson · CPA, Self · Fort Worth, TX · 0.8%
$10,000
345 smaller sources, $76.4K in all (6%), are not listed.
Each committee that gave is followed to where its own money came from, in proportion to what it received: a committee that got half its money from one person is counted as passing half of what it gave on to that person. Each channel shows the committee the money came through and its place in the money tree. It shows who stood behind the money, not what that money was for, and an organization that need not name its donors ends the trail. It stops at a person, an organization, a committee with nothing on file here, or 3committees deep. A person who gave by more than one route appears under each, a name filed two ways may appear twice, and a person's job and city are as they filed them. "Also behind" counts the other groups, among those that moved $100,000 or more into races, in which $100,000 or more traces to the same person, other than those this money came through or went on to.
Ohio4 contributions · 3.1%
$33,835
Illinois7 contributions · 2.5%
$26,700
Wisconsin24 contributions · 2.1%
$22,900
North Carolina5 contributions · 2%
$21,550
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 108 contributions · 70% of ranked
$733,870
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 15 contributions · 19% of ranked
$198,925
MDC INC1 contribution · 4.8% of ranked
$50,000
Beaman Ventures2 contributions · 3.8% of ranked
$40,000
HomemakerWritten instead of an employer · 4 contributions · 1.9% of ranked
$20,000
Bennett Aerospace INC1 contribution · <0.1% of ranked
$1,000
L3harris13 contributions · <0.1% of ranked
$650
Beach Mart Enterprises1 contribution · <0.1% of ranked
$500
A further $36,681 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($97,737) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 109 contributions · 70% of ranked
$734,110
Investor7 contributions · 19% of ranked
$195,000
Real Estate1 contribution · 4.8% of ranked
$50,000
Landscape Consultant1 contribution · 3.1% of ranked
$32,785
HomemakerWritten instead of an occupation · 4 contributions · 1.9% of ranked
$20,000
CPA1 contribution · 1% of ranked
$10,000
Scientific Consultant1 contribution · <0.1% of ranked
$1,000
Engineer12 contributions · <0.1% of ranked
$600
A further $36,441 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($97,737) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Ashley MoodySupport · 13 records · latest Sep 10, 2026$92,320
Bill HagertySupport · 12 records · latest Sep 10, 2026$74,047
IE-LUMMIS-DIRECT MAIL PRODUCTIONIndependent spending in support of Cynthia Marie Lummis$35,785
IE-TUBERVILLE-DIRECT MAIL PRODUCTIONIndependent spending in support of Thomas H. Tuberville$32,823
IE-MORENO-DIRECT MAIL PRODUCTIONIndependent spending in support of Bernie Moreno$26,855
IE-HERN-DIRECT MAIL PRODUCTIONIndependent spending in support of Kevin Hern$23,118
IE-SCOTT-DIRECT MAIL PRODUCTIONIndependent spending in support of Rick Scott$22,883
Paid to
Allegiance DirectIndependent spending: $77.1K in support of Ashley Moody · $63.5K in support of Bill Hagerty and 4 more$619,641
Envision MarketingIndependent spending: $8.4K in support of Thomas H. Tuberville · $8.4K in support of Mike Lee and 4 more$82,565
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$333,54821%
Filed as
PAC FUNDRAISING SERVICES$300,050
PAC DIRECT MAIL FUNDRAISING$20,000
PAC FUNDRAISING CONSULTING$8,523
PAC FUNDRAISING EXPENSES$4,975
Paid to
Bold Colors Group LLC$189,676
Impact Strategies LLC$115,349
Allegiance Direct$20,000
Kennard Financial Inc.$8,523
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$322,48421%
Filed as
PAC STRATEGY CONSULTING$122,970
PAC DIGITAL CONSULTING$114,152
PAC COMPLIANCE CONSULTING$85,362
Paid to
Concept 278$122,970
Zealous LLC$114,152
Professional Data Services Inc.$85,362
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$25.5K of it was independent spending for Ashley Moody and for Michael A. Collins Jr. and 1 more$63,6164%
Filed as
IN-KIND:NDSN STOCK$32,785
IE-MOODY-DIGITALPRODUCTIONIndependent spending in support of Ashley Moody$8,500
IE-COLLINS-DIGITALPRODUCTIONIndependent spending in support of Michael A. Collins Jr.$8,500
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$55.7K of it was independent spending for Roger W. Marshall and for Bill Hagerty and 7 more$55,7003.5%
Filed as
IE-MARSHALL-DIGITAL ADVERTISINGIndependent spending in support of Roger W. Marshall$5,088
IE-HAGERTY-DIGITAL ADVERTISINGIndependent spending in support of Bill Hagerty$5,088
IE-MOORE-DIGITAL ADVERTISINGIndependent spending in support of Felix Barry Moore$5,088
IE-MOODY-DIGITAL ADVERTISINGIndependent spending in support of Ashley Moody$5,088
IE-COLLINS-DIGITAL ADVERTISINGIndependent spending in support of Michael A. Collins Jr.$5,088
IE-HERN-DIGITAL ADVERTISINGIndependent spending in support of Kevin Hern$5,088
Polling and researchSurveys, opposition research, voter file work, and analytics.$5,0000.3%
Filed as
PAC POLLING$5,000
Paid to
Right Point Research$5,000
Not broken out by the committeeReported as a lump sum, with memo entries pointed to for the detail. Where those entries were filed and read, this page counts the payees they name instead; what is left here was never itemised.$289<0.1%
Filed as
SEE MEMO$170
SEE MEMOS$119
Paid to
American Express$289
Total itemized disbursements $1,572,683
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 348 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
18 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $1,782 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Allegiance Direct69 payments · 41% of all spending
$639,641
Bold Colors Group LLC24 payments · 12% of all spending
$189,676
Concept 27822 payments · 7.8% of all spending
$122,970
Impact Strategies LLC22 payments · 7.3% of all spending
$115,349
Zealous LLC22 payments · 7.3% of all spending
$114,152
Professional Data Services Inc.21 payments · 5.4% of all spending
$85,362
Envision Marketing20 payments · 5.2% of all spending
$82,565
Nord, Richard1 payment · 2.1% of all spending
$32,785
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.